Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report by State

Esophagus, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
District of Columbia *** 2.9 (2.3, 3.5) 49 (31, 51) 19 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.4, -3.3)
Alaska *** 4.4 (3.7, 5.1) 16 (2, 42) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.2)
Wyoming *** 4.8 (4.1, 5.5) 5 (1, 32) 37 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.5)
North Dakota *** 4.2 (3.7, 4.9) 20 (3, 42) 40 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Delaware *** 3.4 (3.0, 3.9) 41 (23, 50) 50 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Vermont *** 5.1 (4.5, 5.8) 3 (1, 21) 50 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Hawaii *** 2.5 (2.2, 2.8) 51 (47, 51) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
South Dakota *** 4.5 (4.0, 5.1) 10 (2, 33) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.1)
Rhode Island *** 3.7 (3.3, 4.2) 32 (15, 47) 55 falling falling trend -2.9 (-6.8, -2.0)
Montana *** 4.3 (3.8, 4.8) 19 (3, 35) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Utah *** 2.8 (2.5, 3.0) 50 (45, 51) 84 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Idaho *** 3.9 (3.5, 4.3) 30 (12, 42) 91 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
New Hampshire *** 4.5 (4.1, 4.9) 13 (3, 30) 92 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Puerto Rico *** 1.8 (1.6, 2.0) N/A 95 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.7, 2.4)
New Mexico *** 3.5 (3.2, 3.9) 35 (25, 46) 102 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Nebraska *** 4.7 (4.3, 5.1) 7 (2, 24) 113 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Maine *** 5.8 (5.4, 6.3) 1 (1, 3) 128 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
West Virginia *** 5.3 (4.9, 5.8) 2 (1, 7) 142 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.1)
Mississippi *** 3.9 (3.6, 4.2) 29 (16, 37) 150 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Kansas *** 4.2 (3.9, 4.5) 21 (7, 31) 155 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Nevada *** 4.0 (3.7, 4.3) 27 (13, 35) 157 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Arkansas *** 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) 23 (9, 33) 163 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Connecticut *** 3.5 (3.3, 3.7) 36 (29, 46) 177 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Iowa *** 4.6 (4.3, 4.9) 9 (3, 22) 196 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Louisiana *** 3.6 (3.4, 3.8) 33 (27, 44) 209 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -1.5)
Oklahoma *** 4.3 (4.1, 4.6) 17 (6, 29) 213 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Colorado *** 3.2 (3.0, 3.4) 45 (36, 48) 217 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.3, -2.0)
Alabama *** 3.5 (3.3, 3.7) 38 (31, 45) 235 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Oregon *** 4.3 (4.1, 4.6) 18 (7, 28) 248 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Kentucky *** 4.5 (4.2, 4.7) 12 (4, 24) 259 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Maryland *** 3.4 (3.2, 3.6) 43 (32, 46) 263 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
South Carolina *** 3.9 (3.7, 4.1) 31 (20, 35) 276 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 2.6)
Minnesota *** 4.1 (3.9, 4.3) 24 (14, 32) 296 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Arizona *** 3.4 (3.3, 3.6) 39 (32, 46) 339 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.0, -1.1)
Wisconsin *** 4.4 (4.2, 4.6) 15 (6, 25) 351 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
New Jersey *** 3.0 (2.9, 3.2) 47 (43, 50) 367 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Missouri *** 4.5 (4.3, 4.7) 11 (4, 21) 368 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Tennessee *** 4.2 (4.0, 4.4) 22 (11, 29) 378 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Washington *** 4.0 (3.8, 4.1) 28 (18, 33) 378 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Massachusetts *** 4.0 (3.9, 4.2) 26 (16, 32) 379 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.2, -1.3)
Virginia *** 3.6 (3.4, 3.8) 34 (29, 42) 390 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Indiana *** 4.8 (4.6, 5.0) 4 (2, 13) 409 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
Georgia *** 3.4 (3.3, 3.6) 40 (32, 46) 427 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
North Carolina *** 3.5 (3.3, 3.6) 37 (32, 45) 476 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Michigan *** 4.6 (4.5, 4.8) 8 (3, 16) 644 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Illinois *** 4.0 (3.9, 4.2) 25 (17, 31) 656 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Ohio *** 4.8 (4.6, 4.9) 6 (3, 12) 754 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
New York *** 3.0 (2.9, 3.1) 46 (44, 49) 810 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -2.1)
Pennsylvania *** 4.4 (4.3, 4.6) 14 (8, 22) 821 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Texas *** 3.3 (3.2, 3.4) 44 (39, 46) 1,007 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 2.0)
Florida *** 3.4 (3.3, 3.5) 42 (35, 45) 1,155 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.4)
California *** 2.9 (2.8, 3.0) 48 (47, 51) 1,342 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/19/2026 12:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top