Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Liver & Bile Duct, 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States *** 6.5 (6.5, 6.6) 24,806 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 1.9)
Vermont *** 4.3 (3.6, 4.9) 37 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 3.2)
North Dakota *** 4.4 (3.8, 5.1) 38 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Nebraska *** 4.6 (4.2, 5.0) 102 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.6, 2.9)
Utah *** 4.8 (4.4, 5.2) 118 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.8, 3.1)
Maine *** 5.1 (4.6, 5.6) 97 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.9, 3.3)
Iowa *** 5.2 (4.9, 5.6) 207 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.9, 3.6)
Montana *** 5.3 (4.8, 5.9) 72 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.9, 2.4)
Minnesota *** 5.3 (5.1, 5.6) 348 rising rising trend 2.6 (2.2, 2.9)
New Hampshire *** 5.4 (4.9, 5.9) 95 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.2, 2.5)
Colorado *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 317 rising rising trend 2.5 (2.0, 2.9)
South Dakota *** 5.5 (4.9, 6.2) 56 rising rising trend 3.1 (2.2, 3.9)
Wisconsin *** 5.5 (5.3, 5.8) 397 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.7, 2.2)
Wyoming *** 5.6 (4.8, 6.5) 41 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 2.8)
Connecticut *** 5.7 (5.3, 6.0) 261 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.8)
Idaho *** 5.7 (5.2, 6.2) 108 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.9, 4.4)
New Jersey *** 5.8 (5.6, 6.0) 626 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.1, 1.7)
Kansas *** 5.8 (5.4, 6.2) 201 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.8, 3.9)
West Virginia *** 5.9 (5.4, 6.3) 151 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.7, 2.9)
Ohio *** 5.9 (5.7, 6.1) 870 rising rising trend 2.7 (2.5, 2.9)
Nevada *** 5.9 (5.5, 6.3) 193 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.1, 2.3)
Indiana *** 5.9 (5.7, 6.2) 465 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.1)
Michigan *** 6.0 (5.8, 6.2) 753 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.7, 2.2)
Virginia *** 6.0 (5.7, 6.2) 573 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.4, 3.5)
New York *** 6.1 (6.0, 6.3) 1,473 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Missouri *** 6.2 (5.9, 6.4) 468 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.0)
Florida *** 6.2 (6.1, 6.3) 1,777 rising rising trend 2.3 (2.1, 2.5)
Pennsylvania *** 6.2 (6.1, 6.4) 1,076 rising rising trend 2.4 (2.1, 2.7)
South Carolina *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.5) 383 rising rising trend 2.4 (2.0, 2.8)
Illinois *** 6.3 (6.1, 6.5) 941 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.2, 3.7)
Georgia *** 6.3 (6.1, 6.6) 679 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.8, 4.5)
Arizona *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.6) 526 rising rising trend 2.8 (2.5, 3.2)
Massachusetts *** 6.5 (6.2, 6.7) 545 rising rising trend 2.5 (2.1, 2.9)
Delaware *** 6.5 (5.9, 7.2) 79 rising rising trend 2.9 (2.1, 3.8)
Maryland *** 6.5 (6.2, 6.8) 457 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.8, 4.3)
North Carolina *** 6.5 (6.3, 6.7) 779 rising rising trend 3.3 (3.0, 3.6)
Alaska *** 6.5 (5.6, 7.5) 46 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.5, 3.3)
Oklahoma *** 6.6 (6.3, 7.0) 305 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.9, 3.8)
Kentucky *** 6.7 (6.3, 7.0) 354 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.9, 6.3)
Arkansas *** 6.7 (6.4, 7.1) 248 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.1, 2.9)
Washington *** 6.8 (6.5, 7.0) 565 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.2)
Tennessee *** 6.8 (6.5, 7.1) 547 rising rising trend 2.8 (2.5, 3.2)
Oregon *** 6.8 (6.5, 7.1) 353 rising rising trend 4.3 (3.9, 4.7)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 6.9 (6.6, 7.3) 324 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.4, 7.0)
Rhode Island *** 7.0 (6.3, 7.6) 95 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.7, 3.2)
Alabama *** 7.2 (6.9, 7.5) 429 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.8, 2.6)
Mississippi *** 7.7 (7.3, 8.1) 271 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.2, 2.1)
California *** 7.8 (7.6, 7.9) 3,243 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.6, 2.2)
New Mexico *** 7.9 (7.5, 8.5) 201 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.7, 3.0)
Texas *** 8.1 (7.9, 8.2) 2,163 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.7, 2.0)
Hawaii 8 *** 8.5 (7.8, 9.1) 153 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.4)
Louisiana *** 8.5 (8.2, 8.9) 460 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.7)
District of Columbia *** 9.7 (8.6, 10.8) 65 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.2, 2.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2020 3:32 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top