Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 2.2?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States No 2.2 (2.2, 2.3) N/A 4,207 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Alabama No 3.1 (2.4, 3.8) 6 (1, 22) 89 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Alaska ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Arizona Yes 2.1 (1.6, 2.6) 24 (8, 36) 78 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.3)
Arkansas No 3.3 (2.5, 4.4) 4 (1, 24) 55 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
California No 2.3 (2.1, 2.5) 18 (10, 27) 490 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Colorado Yes 1.9 (1.4, 2.5) 28 (8, 38) 55 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Connecticut Yes 1.1 (0.7, 1.6) 39 (29, 39) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Delaware No 3.1 (1.8, 5.0) 5 (1, 38) 20
*
*
District of Columbia ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Florida No 2.8 (2.5, 3.1) 9 (4, 18) 355 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Georgia Yes 2.1 (1.7, 2.5) 23 (10, 35) 123 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Hawaii 8 ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Idaho ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Illinois Yes 2.1 (1.7, 2.4) 25 (11, 34) 157 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
Indiana No 2.9 (2.4, 3.6) 8 (2, 23) 105 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.6)
Iowa Yes 1.5 (0.9, 2.2) 35 (14, 39) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Kansas Yes 2.1 (1.4, 3.1) 20 (4, 39) 32 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Kentucky No 2.6 (2.0, 3.4) 10 (2, 32) 65 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Louisiana No 3.6 (2.9, 4.4) 3 (1, 13) 96 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Maine ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Maryland Yes 1.7 (1.3, 2.2) 32 (13, 38) 67 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.1, -2.1)
Massachusetts Yes 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 38 (33, 39) 46 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.3, -3.1)
Michigan Yes 2.1 (1.7, 2.6) 22 (9, 34) 121 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Minnesota Yes 1.4 (1.0, 1.9) 36 (20, 39) 48 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Mississippi No 3.6 (2.7, 4.7) 2 (1, 18) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Missouri No 2.4 (1.9, 3.0) 15 (4, 33) 87 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Montana ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Nebraska No 2.2 (1.4, 3.3) 19 (2, 39) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Nevada No 2.3 (1.6, 3.2) 16 (3, 37) 38 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
New Hampshire ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
New Jersey Yes 2.0 (1.7, 2.4) 26 (10, 35) 114 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.8)
New Mexico No 2.4 (1.6, 3.6) 14 (2, 38) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
New York Yes 2.1 (1.9, 2.4) 21 (11, 32) 259 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -1.9)
North Carolina Yes 1.8 (1.5, 2.2) 30 (14, 37) 115 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.3, -2.5)
North Dakota ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Ohio No 2.5 (2.1, 2.9) 12 (5, 28) 174 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Oklahoma No 4.1 (3.3, 5.1) 1 (1, 9) 86 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Oregon Yes 1.9 (1.4, 2.6) 29 (8, 38) 47 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Pennsylvania Yes 1.8 (1.5, 2.2) 31 (16, 37) 150 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Puerto Rico 8 Yes 2.1 (1.5, 2.8) N/A 46
*
*
Rhode Island ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
South Carolina No 2.3 (1.7, 2.9) 17 (5, 35) 66 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
South Dakota ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Tennessee No 2.5 (2.0, 3.1) 11 (4, 30) 103 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Texas No 3.0 (2.7, 3.2) 7 (3, 14) 429 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.2)
Utah Yes 2.0 (1.3, 2.9) 27 (5, 39) 30 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Vermont ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Virginia Yes 1.7 (1.3, 2.1) 34 (18, 38) 83 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.2)
Washington Yes 1.7 (1.3, 2.1) 33 (15, 38) 72 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
West Virginia No 2.5 (1.6, 3.6) 13 (1, 37) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Wisconsin Yes 1.3 (1.0, 1.8) 37 (24, 39) 47 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1)
Wyoming ***
*
*
15 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/12/2020 3:21 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top