Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) N/A 10,923 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Alaska *** 3.2 (2.4, 4.3) 51 (30, 51) 11
*
*
Alabama *** 3.6 (3.3, 3.9) 50 (46, 51) 124 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Arizona *** 3.9 (3.6, 4.2) 49 (41, 51) 187 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.2, 3.3)
Montana *** 4.0 (3.3, 4.7) 48 (20, 51) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Wyoming *** 4.0 (3.2, 5.1) 47 (9, 51) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Kentucky *** 4.1 (3.7, 4.4) 46 (32, 51) 123 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
New Mexico *** 4.2 (3.7, 4.7) 45 (20, 50) 60 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Colorado *** 4.3 (4.0, 4.6) 44 (26, 49) 143 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 3.9)
Nevada *** 4.3 (3.9, 4.8) 43 (18, 50) 80 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Arkansas *** 4.3 (3.9, 4.8) 42 (20, 49) 89 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.9, 7.4)
Connecticut *** 4.4 (4.0, 4.8) 41 (20, 49) 117 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
South Dakota *** 4.4 (3.6, 5.3) 40 (7, 51) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Kansas *** 4.4 (4.0, 4.9) 39 (16, 49) 87 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Texas *** 4.4 (4.3, 4.6) 38 (29, 45) 688 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.7, 3.8)
Tennessee *** 4.5 (4.2, 4.8) 37 (22, 47) 207 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 4.0)
Utah *** 4.5 (4.0, 5.0) 36 (12, 49) 65 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Washington *** 4.5 (4.3, 4.8) 35 (19, 46) 214 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.4, 1.1)
West Virginia *** 4.6 (4.1, 5.1) 34 (11, 49) 65 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Florida *** 4.6 (4.4, 4.7) 33 (24, 42) 771 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.5, 2.5)
Mississippi *** 4.6 (4.2, 5.1) 32 (12, 47) 93 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.7, 1.6)
North Dakota *** 4.6 (3.8, 5.6) 31 (2, 51) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Louisiana *** 4.7 (4.3, 5.0) 30 (13, 46) 144 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.4, 4.9)
Virginia *** 4.7 (4.4, 5.0) 29 (16, 43) 264 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.0)
Oregon *** 4.8 (4.4, 5.2) 28 (11, 44) 137 stable stable trend -3.9 (-10.5, 3.2)
North Carolina *** 4.8 (4.6, 5.1) 27 (13, 38) 342 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.0, 3.7)
Oklahoma *** 4.8 (4.4, 5.2) 26 (10, 45) 123 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.5)
Massachusetts *** 4.8 (4.6, 5.1) 25 (12, 40) 238 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.3, 0.9)
Minnesota *** 4.8 (4.5, 5.2) 24 (11, 41) 179 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.2)
Georgia *** 4.9 (4.7, 5.2) 23 (12, 36) 316 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.4, 3.6)
Missouri *** 4.9 (4.6, 5.3) 22 (10, 37) 214 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 3.7)
Idaho *** 5.0 (4.4, 5.6) 21 (5, 47) 54 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.5, 2.1)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 5.0 (4.6, 5.4) N/A 126 stable stable trend -1.0 (-14.8, 14.9)
Maine *** 5.0 (4.4, 5.6) 20 (4, 45) 57 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.5)
South Carolina *** 5.0 (4.7, 5.3) 19 (9, 36) 180 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.2)
Iowa *** 5.0 (4.6, 5.4) 18 (7, 41) 112 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 1.0)
Nebraska *** 5.0 (4.5, 5.6) 17 (4, 45) 62 stable stable trend 7.6 (-2.1, 18.3)
Indiana *** 5.1 (4.8, 5.4) 16 (9, 34) 228 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 0.9)
California *** 5.1 (5.0, 5.3) 15 (10, 23) 1,238 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.8, 2.7)
Hawaii 8 *** 5.2 (4.5, 5.9) 14 (2, 45) 49 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.1, 2.7)
Rhode Island *** 5.2 (4.5, 6.0) 13 (2, 45) 41 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 2.0)
Ohio *** 5.3 (5.1, 5.5) 12 (7, 22) 446 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 1.8)
Wisconsin *** 5.3 (5.0, 5.6) 11 (5, 27) 212 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.0)
New Hampshire *** 5.3 (4.7, 6.0) 10 (2, 42) 53 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.9)
Pennsylvania *** 5.7 (5.5, 5.9) 9 (3, 13) 559 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.5, 1.0)
Michigan *** 5.7 (5.4, 5.9) 8 (3, 13) 407 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.7, 1.4)
Vermont *** 5.7 (4.8, 6.8) 7 (2, 44) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.7)
New Jersey *** 5.7 (5.5, 6.0) 6 (2, 13) 364 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.5, 1.0)
Illinois *** 5.7 (5.5, 6.0) 5 (2, 12) 493 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.3, 2.5)
Delaware *** 6.0 (5.2, 6.8) 4 (2, 29) 44 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Maryland *** 6.0 (5.7, 6.4) 3 (2, 10) 244 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.1, 2.0)
New York *** 6.0 (5.9, 6.2) 2 (2, 7) 841 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.2, 1.8)
District of Columbia *** 9.8 (8.4, 11.3) 1 (1, 1) 38 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/26/2022 12:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top