Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Ovary, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States *** 6.0 (6.0, 6.1) N/A 13,455 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
District of Columbia *** 6.6 (5.5, 7.9) 3 (1, 49) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Wyoming *** 6.2 (5.1, 7.5) 15 (1, 51) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Utah *** 6.3 (5.7, 6.8) 12 (1, 46) 97 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Delaware *** 6.6 (5.8, 7.5) 4 (1, 46) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Hawaii 8 *** 4.7 (4.2, 5.4) 50 (37, 51) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Nevada *** 6.1 (5.6, 6.7) 21 (2, 47) 117 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.4, -1.0)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 3.9 (3.6, 4.3) N/A 101 stable stable trend -1.7 (-15.4, 14.1)
Alaska *** 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) 41 (1, 51) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Arizona *** 6.3 (5.9, 6.6) 13 (3, 38) 307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.2, -1.2)
Idaho *** 6.1 (5.5, 6.8) 20 (1, 48) 72 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Mississippi *** 5.8 (5.3, 6.3) 36 (5, 49) 117 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.3)
New Hampshire *** 6.1 (5.5, 6.9) 19 (1, 49) 64 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Florida *** 5.9 (5.8, 6.1) 25 (15, 41) 1,035 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.6)
Rhode Island *** 5.3 (4.6, 6.2) 48 (6, 51) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
California *** 6.3 (6.2, 6.4) 9 (5, 24) 1,535 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.8)
Texas *** 5.9 (5.7, 6.1) 29 (16, 42) 947 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.6)
Vermont *** 5.9 (5.0, 7.0) 30 (1, 51) 30 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Maine *** 5.8 (5.1, 6.5) 40 (2, 50) 66 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Michigan *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.7) 7 (2, 26) 458 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.7)
Colorado *** 6.4 (6.0, 6.8) 8 (1, 36) 219 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.9)
Maryland *** 6.0 (5.7, 6.4) 23 (6, 44) 257 falling falling trend -2.3 (-6.0, -1.6)
Massachusetts *** 6.1 (5.8, 6.5) 18 (4, 40) 308 falling falling trend -2.3 (-6.7, -1.6)
West Virginia *** 6.5 (5.9, 7.2) 6 (1, 43) 90 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.7)
Connecticut *** 6.0 (5.6, 6.4) 24 (4, 47) 158 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.4, -1.6)
Georgia *** 6.2 (6.0, 6.5) 14 (4, 35) 412 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -2.1)
Louisiana *** 5.8 (5.4, 6.2) 39 (9, 48) 178 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Missouri *** 5.6 (5.3, 5.9) 44 (20, 49) 242 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -2.0)
Nebraska *** 5.5 (4.9, 6.2) 46 (7, 51) 69 falling falling trend -2.4 (-8.5, -1.6)
Kansas *** 6.3 (5.8, 6.8) 11 (1, 45) 121 falling falling trend -2.5 (-7.3, -1.6)
South Dakota *** 5.9 (5.1, 6.9) 26 (1, 51) 37 falling falling trend -2.5 (-13.6, -1.4)
Indiana *** 5.9 (5.6, 6.2) 31 (9, 46) 266 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.2)
North Carolina *** 5.5 (5.3, 5.8) 45 (27, 49) 394 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -2.1)
Virginia *** 6.1 (5.8, 6.4) 22 (5, 40) 353 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.1, -2.2)
Oklahoma *** 6.9 (6.4, 7.3) 1 (1, 19) 173 falling falling trend -2.7 (-7.8, -0.8)
Washington *** 6.8 (6.4, 7.1) 2 (1, 16) 332 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -2.2)
Minnesota *** 5.8 (5.5, 6.2) 37 (10, 48) 220 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -2.3)
North Dakota *** 4.5 (3.7, 5.5) 51 (33, 51) 23 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.1)
Iowa *** 6.2 (5.7, 6.7) 16 (1, 45) 140 falling falling trend -2.9 (-6.1, -1.9)
Pennsylvania *** 6.2 (6.0, 6.4) 17 (5, 34) 613 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.3)
Ohio *** 5.8 (5.6, 6.0) 38 (17, 46) 493 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -2.1)
Kentucky *** 5.4 (5.0, 5.8) 47 (25, 50) 165 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -2.4)
Montana *** 5.8 (5.1, 6.7) 35 (1, 51) 47 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -2.4)
Wisconsin *** 5.9 (5.6, 6.2) 33 (9, 46) 248 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.6)
New York *** 5.8 (5.7, 6.0) 34 (18, 44) 845 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.6, -2.7)
Alabama *** 5.9 (5.6, 6.3) 28 (7, 46) 211 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.4, -2.8)
New Jersey *** 5.7 (5.4, 5.9) 43 (21, 48) 375 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -2.7)
Arkansas *** 5.7 (5.2, 6.2) 42 (8, 50) 118 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.0, -2.3)
South Carolina *** 5.1 (4.8, 5.5) 49 (38, 51) 190 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -3.1)
Tennessee *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.6) 10 (2, 36) 298 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.6, -2.8)
Illinois *** 5.9 (5.7, 6.2) 27 (12, 43) 517 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.2, -2.1)
New Mexico *** 5.9 (5.3, 6.5) 32 (3, 49) 86 falling falling trend -5.7 (-14.4, -1.4)
Oregon *** 6.6 (6.2, 7.0) 5 (1, 30) 199 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.4, -3.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/13/2024 11:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top