Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Bladder, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States *** 4.2 (4.2, 4.3) N/A 16,599 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Alabama *** 4.4 (4.1, 4.6) 22 (9, 38) 261 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.3)
Alaska *** 3.8 (3.1, 4.6) 43 (4, 51) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Arizona *** 4.1 (3.9, 4.3) 35 (23, 44) 363 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Arkansas *** 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) 33 (13, 46) 155 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
California *** 3.9 (3.8, 3.9) 42 (36, 46) 1,658 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.5, -0.2)
Colorado *** 3.9 (3.6, 4.1) 41 (29, 48) 221 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.2)
Connecticut *** 4.4 (4.1, 4.7) 21 (9, 38) 214 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Delaware *** 5.4 (4.8, 6.0) 1 (1, 18) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
District of Columbia *** 4.2 (3.5, 5.0) 29 (2, 50) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Florida *** 4.3 (4.2, 4.4) 27 (18, 34) 1,384 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.4, -0.1)
Georgia *** 4.4 (4.2, 4.6) 19 (10, 33) 456 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.1)
Hawaii 8 *** 2.8 (2.5, 3.2) 51 (48, 51) 57 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Idaho *** 4.9 (4.4, 5.3) 8 (1, 32) 93 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.2)
Illinois *** 4.4 (4.2, 4.5) 23 (13, 33) 667 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.0)
Indiana *** 4.6 (4.3, 4.8) 14 (7, 29) 361 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.3)
Iowa *** 4.1 (3.9, 4.4) 31 (13, 46) 175 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Kansas *** 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) 32 (13, 46) 147 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.8)
Kentucky *** 5.1 (4.8, 5.4) 5 (1, 12) 270 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 0.9)
Louisiana *** 4.0 (3.7, 4.2) 39 (24, 48) 209 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.4)
Maine *** 5.3 (4.9, 5.8) 2 (1, 13) 108 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Maryland *** 4.3 (4.1, 4.5) 26 (11, 39) 302 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Massachusetts *** 4.6 (4.4, 4.9) 12 (5, 25) 411 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
Michigan *** 4.5 (4.4, 4.7) 16 (8, 28) 580 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Minnesota *** 3.9 (3.7, 4.1) 40 (28, 48) 267 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Mississippi *** 3.5 (3.2, 3.8) 48 (37, 50) 121 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
Missouri *** 4.4 (4.2, 4.6) 20 (10, 35) 340 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.6)
Montana *** 4.2 (3.7, 4.7) 30 (7, 48) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Nebraska *** 4.0 (3.7, 4.4) 37 (14, 49) 95 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
Nevada *** 5.1 (4.7, 5.5) 4 (1, 15) 165 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.4)
New Hampshire *** 5.2 (4.7, 5.7) 3 (1, 20) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
New Jersey *** 4.6 (4.4, 4.7) 15 (7, 28) 516 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)
New Mexico *** 3.8 (3.4, 4.1) 45 (26, 50) 97 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.8)
New York *** 4.0 (3.9, 4.1) 38 (30, 45) 997 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
North Carolina *** 4.1 (4.0, 4.3) 34 (22, 42) 500 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.1, 0.6)
North Dakota *** 3.5 (2.9, 4.1) 49 (23, 51) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Ohio *** 5.0 (4.8, 5.1) 6 (2, 11) 743 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.4)
Oklahoma *** 4.7 (4.5, 5.0) 10 (2, 27) 219 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.7, 1.4)
Oregon *** 4.8 (4.5, 5.1) 9 (2, 21) 252 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Pennsylvania *** 4.6 (4.5, 4.8) 13 (7, 22) 844 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.4)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) N/A 111 stable stable trend -5.6 (-12.4, 1.8)
Rhode Island *** 4.5 (4.0, 5.0) 17 (3, 45) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
South Carolina *** 4.0 (3.8, 4.3) 36 (21, 46) 247 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
South Dakota *** 3.8 (3.3, 4.4) 44 (11, 50) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Tennessee *** 4.3 (4.1, 4.5) 25 (11, 37) 346 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Texas *** 3.7 (3.6, 3.8) 46 (41, 49) 967 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.3, 0.0)
Utah *** 3.3 (3.0, 3.6) 50 (43, 51) 82 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Vermont *** 4.9 (4.2, 5.6) 7 (1, 40) 42 stable stable trend -10.0 (-21.6, 3.2)
Virginia *** 4.4 (4.2, 4.5) 24 (11, 36) 418 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Washington *** 4.4 (4.2, 4.7) 18 (9, 33) 372 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.5)
West Virginia *** 4.7 (4.4, 5.1) 11 (2, 32) 124 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.4)
Wisconsin *** 4.3 (4.1, 4.5) 28 (13, 40) 319 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Wyoming *** 3.6 (2.9, 4.2) 47 (15, 51) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/19/2022 1:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top