Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Kidney & Renal Pelvis, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States *** 3.5 (3.5, 3.5) N/A 14,079 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Montana *** 3.9 (3.4, 4.4) 16 (2, 41) 57 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.3, 5.5)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 1.7 (1.5, 1.9) N/A 85 stable stable trend 1.0 (-11.0, 14.7)
Utah *** 3.3 (3.0, 3.7) 38 (18, 45) 90 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Mississippi *** 4.4 (4.1, 4.7) 4 (1, 16) 159 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Arkansas *** 4.5 (4.2, 4.8) 2 (1, 13) 173 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.5)
Oklahoma *** 4.8 (4.5, 5.1) 1 (1, 5) 227 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
West Virginia *** 4.0 (3.7, 4.4) 13 (2, 32) 105 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Arizona *** 3.6 (3.4, 3.7) 29 (17, 39) 327 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Kansas *** 4.0 (3.7, 4.3) 11 (3, 27) 144 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
New Mexico *** 4.0 (3.7, 4.4) 12 (2, 31) 107 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Idaho *** 3.6 (3.2, 4.0) 27 (7, 43) 75 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Kentucky *** 4.2 (4.0, 4.5) 6 (2, 18) 238 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Missouri *** 4.1 (3.9, 4.3) 8 (3, 20) 325 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Nebraska *** 4.1 (3.7, 4.5) 9 (2, 29) 96 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Tennessee *** 4.0 (3.8, 4.2) 10 (4, 22) 341 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.2)
Georgia *** 3.5 (3.3, 3.6) 32 (21, 40) 395 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Hawaii 8 *** 2.6 (2.3, 2.9) 50 (42, 51) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Oregon *** 3.7 (3.5, 4.0) 21 (9, 36) 200 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
South Carolina *** 3.6 (3.4, 3.8) 28 (14, 39) 236 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
South Dakota *** 4.3 (3.8, 4.9) 5 (1, 30) 50 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Delaware *** 3.6 (3.1, 4.1) 26 (5, 45) 48 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Wisconsin *** 3.8 (3.6, 4.0) 19 (8, 31) 291 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Florida *** 3.1 (3.0, 3.2) 43 (38, 45) 988 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
Illinois *** 3.6 (3.5, 3.8) 25 (16, 35) 562 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Nevada *** 3.5 (3.2, 3.8) 31 (14, 43) 123 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Wyoming *** 3.8 (3.2, 4.5) 20 (1, 46) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Minnesota *** 3.7 (3.5, 3.9) 23 (13, 37) 254 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Colorado *** 3.0 (2.8, 3.2) 45 (38, 49) 181 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Texas *** 4.1 (4.0, 4.2) 7 (4, 16) 1,173 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Maine *** 3.9 (3.5, 4.3) 15 (2, 38) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Maryland *** 3.2 (3.1, 3.4) 39 (28, 45) 235 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
North Carolina *** 3.7 (3.5, 3.8) 22 (15, 34) 466 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Virginia *** 3.4 (3.2, 3.6) 34 (24, 42) 344 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
New Hampshire *** 3.0 (2.7, 3.4) 44 (25, 51) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Rhode Island *** 3.2 (2.8, 3.7) 41 (17, 50) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Washington *** 3.4 (3.2, 3.6) 35 (24, 42) 299 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
North Dakota *** 3.4 (2.8, 4.0) 36 (7, 50) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Ohio *** 3.9 (3.7, 4.0) 18 (10, 25) 584 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Vermont *** 3.4 (2.8, 4.0) 37 (7, 50) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Indiana *** 4.0 (3.8, 4.2) 14 (5, 24) 321 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Pennsylvania *** 3.4 (3.3, 3.6) 33 (25, 40) 613 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Connecticut *** 2.7 (2.5, 2.9) 48 (43, 51) 130 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
District of Columbia *** 2.4 (1.9, 3.0) 51 (38, 51) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Louisiana *** 4.5 (4.2, 4.7) 3 (1, 11) 248 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
California *** 3.2 (3.1, 3.3) 40 (35, 43) 1,435 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
New Jersey *** 2.8 (2.7, 3.0) 46 (42, 50) 320 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
New York *** 2.7 (2.6, 2.8) 49 (45, 51) 668 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Alabama *** 3.6 (3.4, 3.9) 24 (12, 38) 230 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.5)
Michigan *** 3.5 (3.4, 3.7) 30 (19, 39) 460 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.6)
Iowa *** 3.9 (3.6, 4.2) 17 (5, 32) 163 falling falling trend -4.6 (-9.0, -0.1)
Massachusetts *** 2.7 (2.5, 2.8) 47 (44, 51) 239 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.0, -2.1)
Alaska *** 3.1 (2.5, 3.8) 42 (7, 51) 21
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2022 7:33 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top