Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 45.5?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States Yes 43.4 (43.3, 43.5) 155,959 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.6, -2.6)
Alabama No 53.4 (52.5, 54.2) 3,098 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.6, -2.3)
Alaska No 46.0 (43.3, 48.8) 259 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Arizona Yes 35.3 (34.7, 35.9) 2,778 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.4)
Arkansas No 59.0 (57.9, 60.2) 2,118 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
California Yes 32.2 (31.9, 32.4) 12,474 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.2, -3.5)
Colorado Yes 30.2 (29.5, 30.9) 1,574 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.4, -3.3)
Connecticut Yes 37.5 (36.6, 38.3) 1,655 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.3)
Delaware No 48.8 (47.0, 50.7) 560 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
District of Columbia Yes 38.9 (36.7, 41.2) 237 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.2)
Florida Yes 42.4 (42.1, 42.8) 11,880 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.4)
Georgia No 46.2 (45.6, 46.8) 4,554 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.5)
Hawaii 8 Yes 31.6 (30.4, 32.8) 550 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Idaho Yes 36.1 (34.9, 37.4) 635 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Illinois No 46.3 (45.8, 46.9) 6,576 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Indiana No 53.4 (52.7, 54.2) 3,959 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Iowa No 45.6 (44.6, 46.6) 1,749 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Kansas No 45.9 (44.9, 47.0) 1,509 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Kentucky No 67.7 (66.7, 68.8) 3,484 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Louisiana No 53.6 (52.7, 54.6) 2,701 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Maine No 51.6 (50.1, 53.1) 960 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Maryland Yes 41.5 (40.8, 42.3) 2,687 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.9)
Massachusetts Yes 42.1 (41.4, 42.7) 3,349 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.5, -2.7)
Michigan No 48.5 (48.0, 49.1) 5,828 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Minnesota Yes 38.8 (38.1, 39.5) 2,385 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Mississippi No 57.4 (56.3, 58.6) 1,933 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.6)
Missouri No 54.1 (53.3, 54.8) 3,936 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Montana Yes 41.1 (39.5, 42.7) 533 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Nebraska Yes 42.2 (41.0, 43.5) 897 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Nevada Yes 45.4 (44.3, 46.5) 1,343 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.4)
New Hampshire No 45.6 (44.1, 47.1) 748 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
New Jersey Yes 38.3 (37.8, 38.9) 3,980 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.2, -2.6)
New Mexico Yes 30.6 (29.6, 31.6) 737 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
New York Yes 38.9 (38.6, 39.3) 8,891 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.6, -2.6)
North Carolina No 49.0 (48.4, 49.6) 5,516 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.1)
North Dakota Yes 39.5 (37.6, 41.5) 328 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Ohio No 51.7 (51.2, 52.3) 7,307 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Oklahoma No 55.7 (54.7, 56.7) 2,441 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Oregon Yes 42.3 (41.5, 43.2) 2,023 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.6)
Pennsylvania Yes 45.2 (44.7, 45.7) 7,554 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Puerto Rico 8 Yes 13.6 (13.1, 14.1) 617 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.2, 2.4)
Rhode Island No 48.3 (46.6, 50.0) 633 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
South Carolina No 48.8 (48.0, 49.7) 2,806 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.2)
South Dakota Yes 42.9 (41.1, 44.7) 436 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Tennessee No 57.0 (56.2, 57.7) 4,357 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Texas Yes 39.0 (38.6, 39.3) 9,504 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.9, -2.7)
Utah Yes 19.5 (18.7, 20.3) 451 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.6)
Vermont Yes 44.7 (42.7, 46.9) 364 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Virginia Yes 44.0 (43.4, 44.6) 3,938 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.4, -2.8)
Washington Yes 40.6 (39.9, 41.3) 3,083 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.9)
West Virginia No 58.8 (57.4, 60.2) 1,482 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Wisconsin Yes 43.0 (42.3, 43.7) 2,962 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Wyoming Yes 35.3 (33.2, 37.5) 223 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/18/2019 8:26 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top