Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 2.2?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States No 2.3 (2.3, 2.3) 4,135 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Vermont Yes 1.0 (0.6, 1.6) 4
*
*
Rhode Island Yes 1.2 (0.8, 1.6) 8
*
*
Massachusetts Yes 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) 51 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.5, -3.1)
North Dakota Yes 1.3 (0.8, 1.9) 5
*
*
Utah Yes 1.4 (1.1, 1.7) 18 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.1)
Minnesota Yes 1.4 (1.2, 1.6) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
New Hampshire Yes 1.4 (1.1, 1.8) 12
*
*
South Dakota Yes 1.5 (1.0, 2.1) 7
*
*
Connecticut Yes 1.6 (1.3, 1.8) 35 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Colorado Yes 1.6 (1.4, 1.8) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Wisconsin Yes 1.6 (1.4, 1.8) 55 stable stable trend 9.1 (-6.6, 27.4)
Maine Yes 1.7 (1.3, 2.1) 14
*
*
Washington Yes 1.7 (1.5, 1.9) 66 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Idaho Yes 1.7 (1.3, 2.2) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Montana Yes 1.7 (1.3, 2.3) 10
*
*
Virginia Yes 1.8 (1.7, 2.0) 86 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.4)
Alaska Yes 1.9 (1.3, 2.8) 7
*
*
Maryland Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 69 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.2)
Iowa Yes 2.0 (1.7, 2.3) 34 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Hawaii 8 Yes 2.0 (1.5, 2.5) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Oregon Yes 2.0 (1.7, 2.3) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Michigan Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 116 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
New Mexico Yes 2.0 (1.7, 2.5) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
North Carolina Yes 2.1 (1.9, 2.2) 118 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.5, -2.6)
Nebraska Yes 2.1 (1.7, 2.6) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
New Jersey Yes 2.1 (2.0, 2.3) 118 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -2.0)
Kansas Yes 2.1 (1.8, 2.5) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Pennsylvania Yes 2.2 (2.0, 2.3) 171 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Wyoming Yes 2.2 (1.5, 3.1) 7
*
*
Arizona No 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) 80 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.1, 8.9)
California No 2.2 (2.2, 2.3) 464 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
New York No 2.4 (2.2, 2.5) 281 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.1)
Nevada No 2.4 (2.1, 2.8) 36 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Illinois No 2.4 (2.2, 2.6) 180 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Ohio No 2.4 (2.2, 2.6) 163 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.8, -0.4)
Indiana No 2.4 (2.2, 2.7) 89 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Puerto Rico 8 No 2.5 (2.2, 2.8) 52 stable stable trend -3.2 (-13.8, 8.8)
Georgia No 2.5 (2.3, 2.7) 134 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
South Carolina No 2.5 (2.2, 2.8) 69 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Delaware No 2.6 (2.0, 3.2) 15
*
*
Florida No 2.7 (2.5, 2.8) 327 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Missouri No 2.7 (2.5, 3.0) 95 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Tennessee No 2.8 (2.5, 3.0) 106 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Texas No 2.8 (2.7, 3.0) 379 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Kentucky No 2.9 (2.6, 3.2) 72 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Oklahoma No 3.0 (2.6, 3.3) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Louisiana No 3.0 (2.7, 3.3) 75 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
District of Columbia No 3.3 (2.5, 4.3) 11
*
*
Arkansas No 3.3 (2.9, 3.7) 53 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
West Virginia No 3.3 (2.8, 3.9) 36 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Mississippi No 3.4 (3.1, 3.9) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Alabama No 3.5 (3.2, 3.9) 98 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.0, 11.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/18/2019 12:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top