Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States *** 5.7 (5.7, 5.8) 20,272 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Iowa *** 6.6 (6.2, 7.0) 258 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Michigan *** 6.6 (6.4, 6.8) 775 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Kentucky *** 6.5 (6.2, 6.8) 321 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Minnesota *** 6.5 (6.2, 6.8) 394 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.6, -0.5)
Louisiana *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.8) 310 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Indiana *** 6.4 (6.2, 6.7) 468 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Maine *** 6.4 (5.9, 7.0) 116 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.7)
Ohio *** 6.4 (6.2, 6.6) 891 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.0, -2.2)
Idaho *** 6.4 (5.8, 6.9) 108 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Oklahoma *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.7) 268 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Tennessee *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.5) 456 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
West Virginia *** 6.2 (5.8, 6.7) 154 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.8)
Pennsylvania *** 6.2 (6.0, 6.3) 1,038 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.4)
Washington *** 6.1 (5.8, 6.4) 455 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.3)
Wisconsin *** 6.1 (5.8, 6.3) 416 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Oregon *** 6.1 (5.7, 6.4) 286 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Vermont *** 6.0 (5.3, 6.9) 48 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Kansas *** 6.0 (5.6, 6.4) 196 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.2)
Nebraska *** 5.9 (5.4, 6.4) 127 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Illinois *** 5.9 (5.7, 6.1) 827 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.4)
Delaware *** 5.9 (5.2, 6.5) 65 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Arkansas *** 5.8 (5.5, 6.2) 202 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Alabama *** 5.7 (5.4, 6.0) 315 stable stable trend -6.5 (-12.6, 0.0)
Alaska *** 5.7 (4.8, 6.7) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Wyoming *** 5.7 (4.8, 6.6) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
North Carolina *** 5.6 (5.4, 5.8) 608 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -2.0)
Missouri *** 5.6 (5.4, 5.9) 401 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.5)
Virginia *** 5.6 (5.4, 5.8) 485 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.2)
Utah *** 5.6 (5.1, 6.0) 125 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
North Dakota *** 5.6 (4.9, 6.3) 49 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
New Jersey *** 5.5 (5.3, 5.7) 570 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.3)
New York *** 5.5 (5.4, 5.6) 1,245 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Rhode Island *** 5.5 (4.9, 6.1) 74 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.8, -2.9)
South Dakota *** 5.5 (4.9, 6.2) 58 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.5, -2.7)
Texas *** 5.5 (5.4, 5.6) 1,302 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.4)
South Carolina *** 5.5 (5.2, 5.8) 295 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Montana *** 5.5 (4.9, 6.1) 69 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
California *** 5.5 (5.4, 5.6) 2,123 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.4)
Georgia *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 506 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
New Hampshire *** 5.4 (4.9, 6.0) 87 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -1.9)
Maryland *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 347 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.1)
Connecticut *** 5.4 (5.1, 5.7) 243 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 6.0)
Florida *** 5.4 (5.3, 5.5) 1,488 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.1, -2.5)
Massachusetts *** 5.4 (5.1, 5.6) 429 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.7, -2.9)
Mississippi *** 5.3 (5.0, 5.7) 171 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Arizona *** 5.3 (5.0, 5.5) 403 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.4)
Nevada *** 5.1 (4.7, 5.5) 145 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Hawaii 8 *** 5.1 (4.6, 5.6) 90 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
New Mexico *** 5.0 (4.6, 5.5) 119 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Colorado *** 5.0 (4.7, 5.3) 254 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.8, -2.6)
District of Columbia *** 4.3 (3.6, 5.2) 26 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 3.5 (3.3, 3.8) 153 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.5, 6.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2019 9:05 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top