Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 160.2 (158.8, 161.6) N/A 10,422 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Autauga County Urban No 151.6 (139.0, 165.0) 59 (26, 66) 110 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Baldwin County Urban No 145.9 (140.1, 151.9) 62 (51, 65) 511 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.1, -1.9)
Bibb County Urban No 170.1 (149.2, 193.2) 30 (2, 63) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Blount County Urban No 169.9 (157.2, 183.4) 31 (7, 58) 138 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Calhoun County Urban No 175.8 (166.3, 185.8) 22 (6, 47) 269 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.1, -1.2)
Chilton County Urban No 171.9 (156.8, 188.1) 25 (4, 57) 100 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Colbert County Urban No 173.6 (160.9, 187.2) 23 (5, 54) 145 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Elmore County Urban No 169.4 (158.3, 181.2) 33 (9, 56) 180 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Etowah County Urban No 179.7 (169.9, 190.0) 18 (4, 41) 263 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.8)
Geneva County Urban No 182.7 (163.8, 203.5) 11 (1, 55) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Greene County Urban No 181.7 (147.6, 222.3) 13 (1, 66) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Hale County Urban No 178.5 (153.1, 207.3) 21 (1, 64) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Henry County Urban No 171.8 (149.9, 196.5) 27 (1, 64) 48 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Houston County Urban No 154.4 (145.2, 164.1) 54 (31, 63) 220 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 160.0 (156.1, 164.0) 49 (33, 56) 1,322 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.4)
Lauderdale County Urban No 148.3 (139.0, 158.2) 60 (39, 66) 202 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.8, -1.7)
Lawrence County Urban No 181.3 (164.2, 200.0) 14 (1, 54) 86 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Lee County Urban No 163.1 (154.3, 172.2) 43 (19, 58) 272 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.7, -1.2)
Limestone County Urban No 135.1 (126.1, 144.7) 66 (56, 67) 173 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Lowndes County Urban No 165.2 (136.4, 198.9) 42 (1, 66) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Macon County Urban No 181.0 (158.0, 206.8) 15 (1, 60) 49 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Madison County Urban No 141.4 (136.5, 146.4) 63 (55, 66) 660 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.6)
Mobile County Urban No 169.0 (163.9, 174.2) 34 (19, 47) 875 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -1.4)
Montgomery County Urban No 161.4 (154.6, 168.5) 47 (25, 58) 434 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Morgan County Urban No 159.7 (151.0, 168.8) 50 (23, 60) 263 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.8, -0.9)
Pickens County Urban No 166.5 (145.3, 190.3) 40 (3, 65) 46 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.7, -1.1)
Russell County Urban No 191.4 (176.5, 207.2) 5 (1, 35) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-5.5, -0.8)
Shelby County Urban Yes 119.2 (113.4, 125.3) 67 (65, 67) 326 falling falling trend -3.3 (-7.4, -1.9)
St. Clair County Urban No 161.9 (151.7, 172.7) 45 (18, 61) 195 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -1.1)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 136.5 (129.8, 143.5) 65 (58, 66) 328 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -2.0)
Walker County Urban No 187.6 (175.0, 200.9) 7 (1, 34) 174 falling falling trend -3.4 (-8.2, -1.2)
Barbour County Rural No 180.6 (161.2, 202.1) 16 (1, 58) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Bullock County Rural No 138.2 (111.0, 170.5) 64 (10, 67) 19 falling falling trend -9.7 (-22.2, -1.6)
Butler County Rural No 168.8 (147.1, 193.0) 35 (2, 64) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Chambers County Rural No 165.3 (149.5, 182.5) 41 (6, 63) 85 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.3, -1.3)
Cherokee County Rural No 178.8 (160.4, 199.2) 20 (1, 58) 74 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Choctaw County Rural No 152.6 (129.9, 178.9) 56 (7, 67) 34 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Clarke County Rural No 209.5 (187.8, 233.3) 1 (1, 23) 72 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Clay County Rural No 170.2 (146.3, 197.4) 29 (1, 65) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Cleburne County Rural No 171.8 (147.8, 199.1) 26 (1, 65) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Coffee County Rural No 157.0 (143.8, 171.1) 52 (16, 65) 108 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.7, -1.2)
Conecuh County Rural No 167.3 (140.5, 198.4) 38 (1, 66) 31 stable stable trend -1.8 (-15.8, 1.0)
Coosa County Rural No 161.6 (134.4, 193.9) 46 (2, 67) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Covington County Rural No 184.6 (169.1, 201.4) 8 (1, 48) 111 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Crenshaw County Rural No 203.9 (174.9, 236.7) 2 (1, 47) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Cullman County Rural No 152.3 (142.4, 162.8) 57 (33, 65) 186 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.1, -1.4)
Dale County Rural No 166.6 (152.6, 181.6) 39 (8, 60) 108 falling falling trend -1.8 (-6.4, -1.0)
Dallas County Rural No 168.2 (152.4, 185.4) 36 (5, 62) 89 falling falling trend -5.7 (-12.1, -1.7)
DeKalb County Rural No 160.1 (148.6, 172.3) 48 (17, 62) 150 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.6, -0.5)
Escambia County Rural No 192.0 (175.0, 210.5) 3 (1, 39) 97 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Fayette County Rural No 183.5 (159.2, 210.9) 10 (1, 60) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Franklin County Rural No 183.8 (165.5, 203.7) 9 (1, 51) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jackson County Rural No 191.2 (177.3, 206.0) 6 (1, 33) 149 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Lamar County Rural No 170.3 (146.2, 197.8) 28 (1, 65) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.4, -0.6)
Marengo County Rural No 156.0 (135.3, 179.3) 53 (8, 66) 43 falling falling trend -15.0 (-23.3, -4.8)
Marion County Rural No 181.7 (164.5, 200.6) 12 (1, 53) 84 falling falling trend -0.6 (-4.9, -0.1)
Marshall County Rural No 162.8 (152.8, 173.4) 44 (18, 60) 204 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.1, -1.0)
Monroe County Rural No 168.1 (147.3, 191.5) 37 (3, 64) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Perry County Rural No 147.8 (117.7, 184.1) 61 (4, 67) 18 falling falling trend -5.3 (-22.2, -1.4)
Pike County Rural No 172.1 (153.3, 192.7) 24 (3, 62) 64 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Randolph County Rural No 151.7 (132.9, 172.8) 58 (13, 66) 51 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Sumter County Rural No 179.3 (148.7, 214.8) 19 (1, 65) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Talladega County Rural No 180.6 (169.3, 192.5) 17 (3, 41) 201 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 169.6 (154.9, 185.5) 32 (6, 60) 109 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Washington County Rural No 153.0 (130.5, 178.7) 55 (6, 67) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Wilcox County Rural No 191.4 (159.6, 228.3) 4 (1, 63) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Winston County Rural No 159.2 (141.3, 179.2) 51 (8, 66) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 2:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top