Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama No 207.4 (205.0, 209.9) N/A 5,695 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Autauga County No 176.0 (155.0, 199.0) 65 (37, 67) 53 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
Baldwin County No 188.5 (178.5, 199.0) 57 (42, 65) 281 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Barbour County No 244.4 (210.1, 283.0) 11 (1, 56) 38 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Bibb County No 243.5 (205.9, 286.1) 12 (1, 59) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Blount County No 215.7 (194.3, 238.9) 35 (9, 61) 78 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Bullock County No 223.1 (168.2, 290.0) 25 (1, 67) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Butler County No 201.4 (166.3, 242.3) 47 (6, 67) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Calhoun County No 220.2 (203.6, 237.8) 27 (12, 53) 142 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Chambers County No 240.3 (210.1, 273.9) 13 (2, 51) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Cherokee County No 200.2 (172.9, 231.4) 49 (12, 66) 42 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Chilton County No 207.4 (182.6, 234.7) 43 (11, 65) 54 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Choctaw County No 182.5 (146.1, 226.8) 61 (11, 67) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.6)
Clarke County No 232.5 (198.8, 270.9) 21 (2, 61) 36 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Clay County No 217.9 (176.4, 267.4) 32 (2, 67) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Cleburne County No 201.2 (162.0, 247.7) 48 (5, 67) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Coffee County No 185.2 (163.4, 209.2) 60 (27, 67) 55 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Colbert County No 215.9 (194.3, 239.3) 34 (10, 60) 77 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Conecuh County No 170.3 (135.2, 213.7) 66 (21, 67) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.6)
Coosa County No 192.4 (150.3, 244.6) 54 (5, 67) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Covington County No 233.7 (207.5, 262.7) 19 (4, 53) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Crenshaw County No 251.5 (205.4, 305.6) 9 (1, 61) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Cullman County No 210.6 (192.5, 229.9) 39 (14, 60) 107 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Dale County No 209.6 (185.9, 235.6) 41 (11, 64) 59 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.5)
Dallas County No 268.5 (237.5, 302.7) 6 (1, 32) 60 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
DeKalb County No 190.4 (171.5, 210.8) 55 (26, 66) 79 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Elmore County No 216.9 (196.8, 238.6) 33 (10, 58) 93 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Escambia County No 277.4 (246.7, 311.0) 3 (1, 24) 62 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Etowah County No 219.4 (202.8, 237.1) 28 (11, 53) 138 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Fayette County No 219.4 (181.4, 263.9) 29 (2, 66) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Franklin County No 212.9 (182.6, 246.8) 38 (7, 65) 36 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Geneva County No 238.1 (206.5, 273.6) 15 (2, 56) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Greene County No 185.4 (138.5, 245.6) 59 (5, 67) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Hale County No 199.4 (158.7, 248.0) 51 (5, 67) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Henry County No 233.9 (195.1, 279.0) 17 (1, 64) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Houston County No 202.1 (185.8, 219.5) 46 (22, 63) 120 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Jackson County No 248.4 (224.1, 274.8) 10 (1, 38) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jefferson County No 208.0 (200.9, 215.2) 42 (27, 52) 697 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
Lamar County No 228.4 (186.4, 278.1) 23 (1, 65) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Lauderdale County No 200.1 (183.9, 217.6) 50 (22, 64) 117 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.9, -1.3)
Lawrence County No 227.2 (198.4, 259.2) 24 (4, 60) 48 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Lee County No 215.2 (198.9, 232.4) 36 (13, 55) 142 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Limestone County No 181.9 (165.3, 199.7) 62 (39, 67) 96 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.8)
Lowndes County No 276.9 (219.0, 346.4) 4 (1, 57) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Macon County No 278.6 (233.9, 329.9) 2 (1, 41) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Madison County No 179.0 (170.5, 187.9) 63 (51, 66) 345 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Marengo County No 233.9 (195.7, 278.0) 16 (1, 63) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Marion County No 219.3 (191.6, 250.3) 30 (5, 62) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Marshall County No 210.3 (193.0, 228.7) 40 (15, 59) 116 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.4)
Mobile County No 213.8 (205.0, 222.8) 37 (20, 49) 480 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Monroe County No 203.5 (170.0, 242.3) 45 (7, 67) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Montgomery County No 197.4 (185.5, 209.9) 52 (31, 62) 215 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Morgan County No 204.3 (189.1, 220.4) 44 (21, 61) 141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Perry County No 222.5 (166.3, 292.5) 26 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Pickens County No 177.7 (145.8, 214.9) 64 (20, 67) 23 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.6, -2.4)
Pike County No 233.3 (199.9, 270.6) 20 (2, 59) 37 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Randolph County No 196.3 (164.9, 232.5) 53 (9, 67) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Russell County No 259.0 (231.3, 289.0) 7 (1, 35) 70 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Shelby County No 156.7 (146.2, 167.8) 67 (62, 67) 176 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
St. Clair County No 230.0 (210.7, 250.5) 22 (7, 50) 115 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Sumter County No 257.6 (203.2, 322.7) 8 (1, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Talladega County No 238.1 (218.4, 259.2) 14 (4, 41) 116 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Tallapoosa County No 233.9 (208.4, 261.9) 18 (3, 53) 67 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Tuscaloosa County No 186.8 (173.9, 200.3) 58 (40, 66) 172 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Walker County No 269.1 (246.1, 293.8) 5 (1, 22) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Washington County No 190.2 (154.1, 233.0) 56 (10, 67) 21 falling falling trend -13.9 (-25.7, -0.3)
Wilcox County No 294.1 (232.6, 367.5) 1 (1, 49) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Winston County No 218.8 (187.8, 254.0) 31 (5, 65) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 11:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top