Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 133.2 (131.5, 135.0) N/A 4,775 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Autauga County Urban No 133.7 (118.0, 151.2) 46 (8, 65) 53 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Baldwin County Urban Yes 119.9 (112.7, 127.6) 62 (41, 66) 222 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Barbour County Rural No 144.6 (119.8, 173.6) 23 (1, 66) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Bibb County Urban No 137.8 (111.6, 168.8) 33 (2, 67) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Blount County Urban No 146.7 (130.6, 164.4) 20 (3, 56) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Bullock County Rural No 137.3 (99.9, 185.9) 34 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Butler County Rural No 134.8 (108.8, 165.9) 43 (2, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Calhoun County Urban No 151.3 (139.5, 163.9) 11 (3, 42) 129 falling falling trend -1.1 (-4.2, -0.7)
Chambers County Rural No 125.2 (106.5, 146.6) 54 (9, 67) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Cherokee County Rural No 163.2 (137.9, 192.4) 4 (1, 56) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Chilton County Urban No 132.0 (114.3, 152.1) 48 (7, 66) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Choctaw County Rural Yes 114.3 (88.2, 147.7) 65 (6, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Clarke County Rural No 187.2 (159.6, 218.7) 1 (1, 23) 36 stable stable trend 7.0 (-0.1, 18.3)
Clay County Rural No 137.9 (108.3, 174.3) 32 (2, 67) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Cleburne County Rural No 148.7 (118.3, 185.8) 16 (1, 66) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Coffee County Rural No 136.8 (120.3, 155.1) 36 (6, 64) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Colbert County Urban No 138.1 (122.7, 155.1) 31 (6, 62) 63 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Conecuh County Rural No 141.0 (106.8, 184.1) 28 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Coosa County Rural Yes 120.5 (88.9, 162.5) 60 (3, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Covington County Rural No 153.9 (134.6, 175.6) 5 (1, 53) 51 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Crenshaw County Rural No 174.4 (138.3, 218.1) 3 (1, 58) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Cullman County Rural Yes 119.3 (107.4, 132.3) 64 (33, 67) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Dale County Rural No 137.3 (120.3, 156.2) 35 (5, 64) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Dallas County Rural No 134.1 (115.2, 155.5) 45 (5, 66) 39 falling falling trend -4.6 (-16.1, -1.0)
DeKalb County Rural No 136.7 (122.3, 152.5) 37 (7, 63) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-8.3, -0.3)
Elmore County Urban No 135.3 (122.0, 149.7) 41 (10, 62) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Escambia County Rural No 146.8 (126.6, 169.7) 19 (2, 61) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Etowah County Urban No 148.9 (136.9, 161.8) 15 (3, 47) 120 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Fayette County Rural No 179.0 (145.3, 219.0) 2 (1, 49) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Franklin County Rural No 151.7 (129.6, 176.8) 9 (1, 60) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Geneva County Urban No 143.7 (120.8, 170.4) 25 (2, 66) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Greene County Urban No 150.6 (108.5, 205.7) 12 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Hale County Urban No 152.7 (121.0, 191.1) 8 (1, 66) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Henry County Urban No 134.9 (108.7, 166.8) 42 (2, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Houston County Urban No 123.3 (112.3, 135.2) 58 (28, 66) 97 falling falling trend -2.5 (-7.1, -1.1)
Jackson County Rural No 153.7 (136.9, 172.4) 6 (2, 48) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 134.2 (129.5, 139.1) 44 (25, 52) 639 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Lamar County Rural No 148.4 (117.3, 186.6) 17 (1, 66) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Lauderdale County Urban No 124.2 (112.6, 136.9) 55 (23, 66) 93 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Lawrence County Urban No 135.9 (115.6, 159.1) 39 (4, 66) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Lee County Urban No 133.3 (122.8, 144.5) 47 (15, 61) 123 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.6, -0.9)
Limestone County Urban Yes 119.4 (107.9, 131.8) 63 (31, 66) 81 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Lowndes County Urban No 130.7 (96.5, 174.7) 51 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Macon County Urban No 139.3 (113.2, 170.6) 29 (2, 67) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Madison County Urban No 126.9 (120.7, 133.4) 53 (33, 62) 326 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -1.1)
Marengo County Rural Yes 120.3 (96.3, 149.2) 61 (7, 67) 19 stable stable trend -16.3 (-34.5, 0.3)
Marion County Rural No 151.5 (130.3, 175.8) 10 (1, 59) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Marshall County Rural No 131.1 (118.9, 144.3) 50 (15, 64) 89 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Mobile County Urban No 141.6 (135.4, 148.1) 27 (13, 45) 405 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -1.1)
Monroe County Rural No 127.8 (103.7, 156.7) 52 (4, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Montgomery County Urban No 135.5 (127.2, 144.2) 40 (15, 56) 208 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Morgan County Urban No 138.7 (127.7, 150.6) 30 (10, 57) 123 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.4, -0.5)
Perry County Rural No 131.4 (94.9, 179.5) 49 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Pickens County Urban No 144.3 (118.1, 175.6) 24 (1, 66) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Pike County Rural No 145.5 (122.5, 171.8) 22 (2, 65) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 123.4 (100.6, 150.5) 57 (6, 67) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Russell County Urban No 150.2 (132.9, 169.2) 13 (2, 57) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Shelby County Urban Yes 100.3 (93.2, 107.9) 67 (62, 67) 151 falling falling trend -2.7 (-7.6, -1.6)
St. Clair County Urban No 123.6 (111.6, 136.6) 56 (25, 66) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Sumter County Rural No 147.7 (110.2, 194.6) 18 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Talladega County Rural No 153.7 (139.6, 169.0) 7 (2, 43) 93 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 141.9 (123.2, 163.1) 26 (3, 63) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Tuscaloosa County Urban Yes 112.9 (104.9, 121.4) 66 (49, 67) 152 falling falling trend -2.2 (-5.7, -1.6)
Walker County Urban No 149.6 (134.5, 166.2) 14 (2, 51) 77 falling falling trend -2.1 (-7.0, -0.4)
Washington County Rural No 136.1 (107.5, 171.1) 38 (2, 67) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Wilcox County Rural No 145.9 (109.7, 191.5) 21 (1, 67) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Winston County Rural Yes 121.3 (100.7, 146.0) 59 (11, 67) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/09/2024 5:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top