Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A Yes 14.4 (14.0, 14.8) N/A 913 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -1.4)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Clarke County Rural Yes 28.7 (21.1, 38.4) 1 (1, 24) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6)
Conecuh County Rural Yes 23.0 (13.2, 37.9) 2 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Dallas County Rural Yes 21.9 (16.1, 29.1) 3 (1, 44) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-9.2, -0.5)
Fayette County Rural Yes 21.9 (13.5, 33.9) 4 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 4.1)
Russell County Urban Yes 21.2 (16.5, 26.9) 5 (1, 38) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Sumter County Rural Yes 21.1 (11.6, 35.8) 6 (1, 57) 3 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.7, 5.2)
Cleburne County Rural Yes 21.1 (13.4, 32.3) 7 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Washington County Rural Yes 20.3 (12.6, 31.4) 8 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Marion County Rural Yes 19.3 (14.0, 26.4) 9 (1, 52) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Crenshaw County Rural Yes 18.5 (10.8, 30.3) 10 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Barbour County Rural Yes 18.3 (12.3, 26.5) 11 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6)
Talladega County Rural Yes 18.2 (14.7, 22.3) 12 (2, 44) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Pickens County Urban Yes 18.0 (11.4, 27.5) 13 (1, 57) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Monroe County Rural Yes 17.6 (10.7, 27.5) 14 (1, 57) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.3)
Lawrence County Urban Yes 17.6 (12.4, 24.5) 15 (1, 54) 8
*
*
Walker County Urban Yes 17.5 (13.7, 22.0) 16 (3, 51) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Covington County Rural Yes 17.4 (12.8, 23.4) 17 (2, 54) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Jackson County Rural Yes 17.3 (13.3, 22.2) 18 (3, 51) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Colbert County Urban Yes 17.2 (13.3, 22.0) 19 (3, 51) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Macon County Urban Yes 17.1 (10.7, 26.6) 20 (1, 57) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Escambia County Rural Yes 17.1 (12.2, 23.4) 21 (2, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Marengo County Rural Yes 16.8 (10.8, 25.4) 22 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Elmore County Urban Yes 16.5 (13.2, 20.6) 23 (4, 51) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.1)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 16.4 (14.3, 18.8) 24 (8, 44) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Calhoun County Urban Yes 16.4 (13.5, 19.7) 25 (6, 48) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.6)
Chambers County Rural Yes 16.1 (11.4, 22.5) 26 (3, 57) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Pike County Rural Yes 15.8 (10.5, 23.1) 27 (2, 57) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Etowah County Urban Yes 15.8 (13.0, 19.2) 28 (7, 50) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Tallapoosa County Rural Yes 15.8 (11.1, 21.8) 29 (3, 56) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Mobile County Urban Yes 15.6 (14.0, 17.3) 30 (13, 44) 78 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.2)
Autauga County Urban Yes 15.6 (11.6, 20.5) 31 (4, 55) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.7, 0.1)
Clay County Rural Yes 15.0 (8.7, 25.0) 32 (2, 57) 3
*
*
Randolph County Rural Yes 15.0 (9.5, 22.8) 33 (3, 57) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Butler County Rural Yes 14.6 (9.1, 22.8) 34 (2, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Marshall County Rural Yes 14.5 (11.5, 18.0) 35 (9, 55) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
DeKalb County Rural Yes 14.4 (11.1, 18.4) 36 (8, 55) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.4)
Henry County Urban Yes 14.3 (8.1, 24.0) 37 (2, 57) 3
*
*
Cherokee County Rural Yes 14.3 (9.2, 21.6) 38 (3, 57) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.6)
Houston County Urban Yes 14.3 (11.5, 17.5) 39 (12, 54) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Morgan County Urban Yes 14.1 (11.5, 17.1) 40 (13, 54) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Franklin County Rural Yes 14.0 (9.3, 20.5) 41 (4, 57) 6 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Tuscaloosa County Urban Yes 13.7 (11.6, 16.0) 42 (18, 54) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Lee County Urban Yes 13.6 (11.2, 16.4) 43 (15, 55) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.6)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 13.5 (12.4, 14.8) 44 (27, 50) 110 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Lauderdale County Urban Yes 13.5 (10.6, 16.9) 45 (13, 56) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Blount County Urban Yes 13.4 (10.0, 17.6) 46 (10, 57) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Chilton County Urban Yes 13.1 (9.2, 18.3) 47 (9, 57) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.0)
Madison County Urban Yes 12.8 (11.4, 14.4) 48 (28, 54) 59 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Coffee County Rural Yes 12.7 (9.1, 17.3) 49 (12, 57) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
St. Clair County Urban Yes 11.9 (9.2, 15.2) 50 (21, 57) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.3)
Dale County Rural Yes 11.6 (8.1, 16.1) 51 (14, 57) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Baldwin County Urban Yes 11.3 (9.7, 13.1) 52 (35, 57) 38 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Winston County Rural Yes 11.3 (7.0, 17.8) 53 (10, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.3)
Cullman County Rural Yes 10.5 (8.0, 13.6) 54 (31, 57) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Limestone County Urban Yes 10.0 (7.7, 12.9) 55 (35, 57) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.6)
Geneva County Urban Yes 9.7 (5.7, 15.9) 56 (15, 57) 4
*
*
Shelby County Urban Yes 9.7 (8.1, 11.6) 57 (45, 57) 26 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.1)
Bibb County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 9:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top