Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 40.5 (39.8, 41.2) N/A 2,726 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.7)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Geneva County Urban No 62.6 (52.0, 75.1) 1 (1, 27) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Franklin County Rural No 60.6 (50.4, 72.3) 2 (1, 34) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Jackson County Rural No 56.7 (49.5, 64.9) 3 (1, 28) 46 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Barbour County Rural No 56.3 (45.9, 68.6) 4 (1, 45) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Walker County Urban No 56.2 (49.5, 63.6) 5 (1, 31) 54 falling falling trend -6.8 (-17.3, -1.8)
Lawrence County Urban No 55.7 (46.7, 66.2) 6 (1, 40) 27 falling falling trend -2.6 (-16.7, -0.1)
Cherokee County Rural No 54.3 (44.6, 66.0) 7 (1, 46) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.6)
Clay County Rural No 52.0 (39.6, 67.9) 8 (1, 60) 12 falling falling trend -4.4 (-17.7, -0.6)
Fayette County Rural No 51.6 (40.1, 66.0) 9 (1, 57) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Greene County Urban No 51.5 (35.2, 74.5) 10 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Covington County Rural No 51.5 (43.6, 60.6) 11 (1, 46) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.3, -0.8)
Escambia County Rural No 51.2 (42.8, 60.9) 12 (1, 50) 27 falling falling trend -10.8 (-19.4, -0.9)
Calhoun County Urban No 49.9 (45.0, 55.3) 13 (3, 39) 79 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.7)
Henry County Urban No 49.5 (38.4, 63.5) 14 (1, 59) 14 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Cleburne County Rural No 49.3 (37.2, 64.6) 15 (1, 62) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-6.8, -0.3)
Talladega County Rural No 49.3 (43.6, 55.5) 16 (3, 44) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.6)
Crenshaw County Rural No 49.3 (36.3, 66.1) 17 (1, 63) 10 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Coosa County Rural No 48.6 (35.0, 67.3) 18 (1, 65) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Marshall County Rural No 48.4 (43.2, 54.2) 19 (4, 45) 64 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.8)
Chilton County Urban No 48.3 (40.6, 57.1) 20 (2, 53) 29 falling falling trend -3.0 (-10.3, -1.2)
Colbert County Urban No 48.1 (41.7, 55.4) 21 (3, 49) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Dale County Rural No 47.6 (40.3, 55.8) 22 (3, 53) 32 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.9, -2.3)
Morgan County Urban No 47.0 (42.5, 52.0) 23 (7, 45) 80 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -1.4)
Etowah County Urban No 46.9 (42.1, 52.2) 24 (7, 46) 71 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.9)
Bibb County Urban No 46.9 (36.4, 59.6) 25 (1, 63) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.3)
St. Clair County Urban No 46.8 (41.5, 52.6) 26 (6, 49) 58 falling falling trend -2.4 (-7.4, -1.7)
Lamar County Rural No 46.5 (34.4, 62.1) 27 (1, 65) 10 falling falling trend -4.4 (-16.7, -1.0)
Marion County Rural No 46.4 (38.0, 56.5) 28 (2, 58) 22 falling falling trend -3.1 (-7.4, -1.6)
Blount County Urban No 45.7 (39.4, 52.8) 29 (6, 55) 39 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -1.2)
Randolph County Rural No 45.6 (35.7, 57.8) 30 (1, 62) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Sumter County Rural No 45.2 (31.7, 63.4) 31 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Russell County Urban No 44.6 (37.7, 52.4) 32 (5, 57) 31 falling falling trend -2.6 (-7.1, -1.8)
Cullman County Rural No 44.0 (38.9, 49.6) 33 (11, 53) 56 falling falling trend -3.8 (-9.4, -2.1)
Elmore County Urban No 43.9 (38.4, 50.0) 34 (9, 53) 48 falling falling trend -4.6 (-11.2, -2.3)
Autauga County Urban No 43.9 (37.3, 51.4) 35 (7, 58) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Hale County Urban No 43.8 (32.1, 59.1) 36 (2, 66) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Monroe County Rural No 43.5 (33.7, 55.8) 37 (2, 65) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Winston County Rural No 43.2 (34.3, 54.2) 38 (4, 63) 17 falling falling trend -5.0 (-15.6, -2.3)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 42.9 (36.1, 50.8) 39 (8, 59) 30 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 5.2)
Mobile County Urban No 42.2 (39.7, 44.8) 40 (23, 50) 224 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.0, -3.0)
Pike County Rural No 41.8 (32.9, 52.4) 41 (5, 65) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
DeKalb County Rural No 41.3 (35.8, 47.6) 42 (13, 59) 41 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -2.0)
Coffee County Rural No 41.0 (34.5, 48.4) 43 (12, 62) 29 falling falling trend -12.3 (-19.4, -2.4)
Dallas County Rural No 40.9 (33.7, 49.5) 44 (10, 63) 23 falling falling trend -6.0 (-13.9, -3.1)
Clarke County Rural No 40.6 (31.8, 51.5) 45 (7, 66) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Butler County Rural No 40.1 (30.5, 52.2) 46 (5, 66) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Lauderdale County Urban No 39.6 (35.0, 44.8) 47 (22, 60) 55 falling falling trend -4.3 (-9.7, -2.2)
Macon County Urban No 38.1 (28.8, 50.2) 48 (7, 67) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.5)
Houston County Urban No 37.9 (33.5, 42.7) 49 (29, 62) 56 falling falling trend -3.8 (-8.9, -2.2)
Lee County Urban No 37.3 (33.3, 41.7) 50 (31, 62) 65 falling falling trend -6.3 (-14.5, -2.6)
Wilcox County Rural No 37.1 (24.6, 54.6) 51 (3, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Conecuh County Rural No 36.8 (26.1, 51.7) 52 (5, 67) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 36.6 (34.8, 38.5) 53 (42, 59) 308 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.6, -3.1)
Baldwin County Urban No 36.5 (33.7, 39.4) 54 (39, 60) 134 falling falling trend -9.8 (-16.1, -2.9)
Pickens County Urban No 35.8 (26.7, 47.7) 55 (9, 67) 10 falling falling trend -5.8 (-24.2, -1.4)
Chambers County Rural No 35.7 (28.8, 44.0) 56 (23, 66) 19 falling falling trend -5.4 (-14.8, -2.7)
Lowndes County Urban No 33.8 (22.0, 50.8) 57 (5, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.7)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 33.2 (30.0, 36.6) 58 (45, 65) 83 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.9, -3.6)
Madison County Urban No 32.2 (29.9, 34.6) 59 (51, 65) 154 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.6, -3.1)
Choctaw County Rural No 31.8 (22.3, 45.1) 60 (20, 67) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 31.6 (28.6, 34.8) 61 (49, 66) 87 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.6, -3.1)
Washington County Rural No 31.4 (21.8, 44.4) 62 (15, 67) 7 falling falling trend -19.7 (-40.2, -3.1)
Limestone County Urban No 30.4 (26.3, 35.0) 63 (47, 67) 41 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.4, -2.8)
Shelby County Urban No 28.7 (25.9, 31.7) 64 (56, 67) 80 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.8, -3.6)
Bullock County Rural No 27.5 (16.4, 43.9) 65 (16, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Marengo County Rural No 27.1 (18.9, 38.1) 66 (35, 67) 8 falling falling trend -14.3 (-37.5, -2.8)
Perry County Rural Yes 24.3 (13.7, 41.3) 67 (27, 67) 3 falling falling trend -4.8 (-29.6, -1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 5:04 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top