Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama *** 46.4 (45.6, 47.1) N/A 2,924 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.0, -3.0)
United States *** 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) N/A 146,023 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.2, -4.5)
Choctaw County *** 28.9 (19.6, 42.1) 67 (41, 67) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Shelby County *** 33.0 (29.8, 36.5) 66 (57, 67) 81 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.2, -2.8)
Montgomery County *** 36.5 (33.2, 39.9) 65 (51, 67) 96 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.8, -3.2)
Butler County *** 37.0 (27.8, 48.6) 64 (18, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Perry County *** 37.4 (23.4, 57.4) 63 (3, 67) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
Hale County *** 37.4 (26.5, 51.9) 62 (10, 67) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Lowndes County *** 38.2 (24.7, 57.0) 61 (3, 67) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.3)
Madison County *** 38.9 (36.3, 41.6) 60 (47, 65) 168 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Monroe County *** 39.1 (30.1, 50.5) 59 (15, 67) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Limestone County *** 39.8 (34.8, 45.3) 58 (35, 66) 47 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.5, -3.0)
Clarke County *** 40.5 (31.6, 51.5) 57 (12, 67) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Houston County *** 40.9 (36.3, 46.1) 56 (31, 65) 58 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Pickens County *** 42.3 (32.5, 54.5) 55 (7, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Tuscaloosa County *** 43.0 (39.1, 47.2) 54 (29, 63) 93 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.2)
Lee County *** 43.1 (38.3, 48.2) 53 (24, 63) 63 falling falling trend -7.5 (-13.5, -1.1)
Jefferson County *** 43.2 (41.2, 45.4) 52 (37, 59) 348 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Randolph County *** 43.7 (34.4, 55.3) 51 (6, 67) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Wilcox County *** 43.7 (30.1, 62.3) 50 (2, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Greene County *** 43.8 (29.3, 64.6) 49 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Lauderdale County *** 44.1 (39.2, 49.6) 48 (20, 63) 60 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.5, -1.1)
Baldwin County *** 44.5 (41.2, 48.0) 47 (27, 59) 142 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Autauga County *** 47.2 (40.0, 55.4) 46 (6, 63) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
Mobile County *** 47.3 (44.7, 50.1) 45 (21, 51) 245 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.0, -2.1)
Conecuh County *** 47.4 (34.8, 64.0) 44 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Chilton County *** 47.5 (39.8, 56.4) 43 (5, 63) 28 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.9, -1.4)
Chambers County *** 47.5 (39.2, 57.3) 42 (5, 64) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Cleburne County *** 47.5 (35.3, 63.2) 41 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.6)
Washington County *** 47.6 (35.6, 62.7) 40 (2, 67) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Elmore County *** 47.9 (41.7, 54.8) 39 (8, 60) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Winston County *** 47.9 (38.3, 59.6) 38 (3, 65) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Morgan County *** 48.0 (43.2, 53.2) 37 (12, 56) 77 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
Marengo County *** 48.0 (36.6, 62.2) 36 (2, 66) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Cherokee County *** 48.1 (39.1, 59.0) 35 (4, 64) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Bullock County *** 48.1 (32.5, 69.2) 34 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Coosa County *** 48.4 (35.3, 66.4) 33 (1, 67) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Franklin County *** 48.7 (39.3, 59.8) 32 (2, 64) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Dale County *** 48.7 (41.3, 57.2) 31 (4, 61) 31 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.9, -2.1)
Bibb County *** 49.8 (38.8, 63.1) 30 (2, 65) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Dallas County *** 50.1 (41.8, 59.7) 29 (2, 61) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Crenshaw County *** 50.1 (37.4, 66.5) 28 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Pike County *** 50.4 (40.3, 62.3) 27 (2, 64) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Marion County *** 50.9 (42.2, 61.1) 26 (2, 61) 25 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.8)
Coffee County *** 51.0 (43.6, 59.4) 25 (3, 57) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Talladega County *** 51.3 (45.4, 57.9) 24 (5, 54) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
DeKalb County *** 51.6 (45.3, 58.7) 23 (4, 54) 49 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.3)
Fayette County *** 51.8 (40.0, 66.5) 22 (1, 64) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Lamar County *** 51.8 (38.0, 69.3) 21 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend -20.1 (-37.6, 2.5)
Colbert County *** 51.8 (44.9, 59.6) 20 (3, 55) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Tallapoosa County *** 52.1 (44.3, 61.1) 19 (2, 57) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Cullman County *** 52.2 (46.4, 58.6) 18 (4, 50) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Calhoun County *** 52.5 (47.4, 58.0) 17 (5, 47) 80 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
St. Clair County *** 52.5 (46.6, 59.1) 16 (4, 49) 58 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Henry County *** 52.6 (40.8, 67.2) 15 (1, 64) 14 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Etowah County *** 52.8 (47.6, 58.5) 14 (4, 45) 78 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.4, -1.7)
Sumter County *** 54.1 (38.7, 74.2) 13 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Clay County *** 54.2 (41.1, 71.0) 12 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Macon County *** 54.6 (42.8, 69.2) 11 (1, 62) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Russell County *** 55.6 (47.7, 64.5) 10 (1, 50) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Blount County *** 55.7 (48.5, 63.7) 9 (2, 45) 44 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Escambia County *** 56.8 (47.8, 67.1) 8 (1, 51) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lawrence County *** 58.6 (49.2, 69.6) 7 (1, 47) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Marshall County *** 59.1 (53.2, 65.5) 6 (1, 31) 74 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Jackson County *** 60.0 (52.4, 68.6) 5 (1, 39) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Barbour County *** 60.4 (49.4, 73.3) 4 (1, 49) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Covington County *** 60.4 (51.7, 70.4) 3 (1, 39) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Geneva County *** 62.3 (51.9, 74.6) 2 (1, 43) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Walker County *** 69.7 (62.2, 77.9) 1 (1, 11) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/25/2021 12:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top