Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama No 44.6 (43.9, 45.4) N/A 2,874 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.0, -3.1)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Clay County No 53.1 (40.0, 69.9) 14 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Bullock County No 46.9 (31.5, 67.8) 38 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Cherokee County No 50.7 (41.6, 61.6) 22 (1, 60) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Lawrence County No 59.1 (49.7, 70.1) 5 (1, 41) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Perry County No 34.7 (21.2, 54.5) 64 (3, 67) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.4)
Barbour County No 58.3 (47.5, 71.0) 7 (1, 50) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Covington County No 56.1 (47.8, 65.7) 9 (1, 46) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Lowndes County No 36.9 (23.9, 55.2) 62 (4, 67) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Randolph County No 46.8 (37.1, 58.7) 39 (2, 65) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Wilcox County No 43.0 (29.4, 61.5) 48 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Greene County No 45.3 (30.5, 66.4) 44 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.3)
Tallapoosa County No 48.9 (41.4, 57.6) 27 (3, 60) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Fayette County No 54.1 (42.3, 68.8) 13 (1, 61) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Chilton County No 49.0 (41.2, 57.9) 26 (3, 60) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Walker County No 62.5 (55.5, 70.3) 1 (1, 23) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Dallas County No 47.8 (39.7, 57.2) 32 (4, 62) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Franklin County No 52.6 (42.9, 64.1) 16 (1, 58) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Bibb County No 51.1 (40.0, 64.6) 20 (1, 63) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Escambia County No 59.6 (50.4, 70.2) 3 (1, 40) 30 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Jackson County No 58.5 (51.0, 67.0) 6 (1, 36) 46 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Monroe County No 39.3 (30.2, 50.8) 56 (11, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Pickens County No 37.6 (28.3, 49.3) 61 (14, 67) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Sumter County No 59.3 (43.2, 80.0) 4 (1, 63) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Cullman County No 49.1 (43.5, 55.2) 25 (7, 52) 58 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Geneva County No 62.3 (51.9, 74.6) 2 (1, 37) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Talladega County No 51.9 (45.9, 58.4) 19 (3, 47) 58 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Butler County No 39.4 (30.0, 51.3) 55 (10, 67) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Crenshaw County No 55.8 (42.2, 73.1) 10 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Winston County No 49.4 (39.7, 61.0) 24 (1, 63) 19 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Blount County No 52.4 (45.5, 60.1) 17 (2, 49) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Clarke County No 40.1 (31.4, 50.9) 53 (11, 67) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Conecuh County No 44.5 (32.8, 60.2) 45 (2, 67) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Elmore County No 46.6 (40.7, 53.2) 40 (10, 59) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Henry County No 47.5 (36.4, 61.4) 34 (1, 66) 13 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Macon County No 46.0 (35.5, 59.4) 42 (2, 66) 13 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Washington County No 39.3 (28.5, 53.2) 57 (7, 67) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Coffee County No 48.4 (41.3, 56.6) 28 (5, 59) 33 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Colbert County No 52.1 (45.3, 59.8) 18 (2, 51) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Coosa County No 46.9 (34.0, 64.8) 37 (1, 67) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Hale County No 38.9 (27.9, 53.3) 59 (5, 67) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Marengo County No 42.5 (32.0, 55.6) 49 (4, 67) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Pike County No 47.8 (38.1, 59.3) 33 (2, 64) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Russell County No 55.1 (47.3, 63.9) 11 (1, 45) 37 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
St. Clair County No 52.7 (46.8, 59.1) 15 (3, 45) 61 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Houston County No 39.6 (35.1, 44.6) 54 (33, 65) 57 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Autauga County No 44.4 (37.5, 52.3) 47 (9, 64) 30 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Calhoun County No 54.4 (49.2, 60.0) 12 (2, 37) 84 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Cleburne County No 48.0 (35.9, 63.5) 30 (1, 66) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.2)
Morgan County No 48.0 (43.2, 53.1) 31 (11, 52) 78 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Choctaw County No 27.3 (18.3, 40.4) 67 (43, 67) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.5)
Marshall County No 56.2 (50.5, 62.5) 8 (1, 35) 72 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.6)
DeKalb County No 47.4 (41.4, 54.2) 35 (7, 59) 46 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.4, -1.1)
Marion County No 50.5 (41.8, 60.7) 23 (1, 59) 24 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Tuscaloosa County No 38.9 (35.3, 42.9) 58 (39, 64) 87 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.1, -2.6)
Jefferson County No 40.9 (38.9, 43.0) 50 (39, 59) 333 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.5, -2.5)
Lauderdale County No 44.5 (39.6, 49.9) 46 (17, 61) 62 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -1.0)
Mobile County No 46.4 (43.8, 49.1) 41 (22, 50) 244 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -2.5)
Etowah County No 51.0 (46.0, 56.6) 21 (5, 46) 76 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.1, -2.1)
Dale County No 48.4 (41.0, 56.7) 29 (4, 61) 31 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -2.2)
Shelby County No 33.2 (30.1, 36.6) 65 (55, 67) 86 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.2, -2.8)
Limestone County No 38.2 (33.4, 43.5) 60 (36, 66) 47 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.2, -3.1)
Chambers County No 45.3 (37.3, 54.9) 43 (6, 65) 23 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.7, -1.5)
Montgomery County No 32.7 (29.6, 36.0) 66 (56, 67) 87 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.5, -3.5)
Madison County No 35.9 (33.4, 38.5) 63 (51, 66) 161 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.5, -3.6)
Lee County No 40.7 (36.2, 45.7) 51 (30, 64) 62 falling falling trend -7.8 (-12.6, -2.8)
Baldwin County No 40.3 (37.2, 43.5) 52 (38, 62) 135 stable stable trend -8.7 (-18.5, 2.2)
Lamar County No 47.0 (34.3, 63.5) 36 (1, 67) 10 falling falling trend -9.7 (-18.0, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 9:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top