Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Breast, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama *** 21.4 (20.7, 22.2) N/A 709 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
United States *** 19.9 (19.8, 20.0) N/A 41,951 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Autauga County *** 18.6 (12.9, 26.3) 35 (5, 48) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Baldwin County *** 20.2 (17.1, 23.8) 26 (10, 43) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Blount County *** 21.7 (15.6, 29.7) 19 (2, 47) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Butler County *** 21.8 (12.2, 36.8) 18 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Calhoun County *** 19.6 (15.4, 24.6) 30 (8, 46) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
Chambers County *** 22.9 (15.6, 33.1) 16 (1, 47) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Chilton County *** 18.6 (12.0, 27.8) 34 (3, 48) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.3)
Clarke County *** 17.7 (10.4, 29.2) 43 (2, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Coffee County *** 18.6 (12.6, 26.7) 33 (4, 48) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.3)
Colbert County *** 26.3 (19.2, 35.2) 8 (1, 43) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Covington County *** 18.5 (12.3, 27.3) 38 (3, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Cullman County *** 15.8 (11.4, 21.4) 45 (15, 48) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Dale County *** 20.0 (13.8, 28.4) 27 (3, 48) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Dallas County *** 20.6 (13.4, 30.6) 25 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.3)
DeKalb County *** 19.9 (14.4, 26.8) 28 (4, 48) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Elmore County *** 17.8 (13.0, 23.9) 41 (10, 48) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -1.9)
Escambia County *** 29.6 (20.4, 41.9) 2 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Etowah County *** 21.5 (16.9, 27.1) 22 (4, 45) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Franklin County *** 18.3 (10.8, 29.3) 39 (2, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.6)
Geneva County *** 21.4 (12.9, 34.0) 23 (1, 48) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Henry County *** 22.6 (12.8, 38.8) 17 (1, 48) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Houston County *** 18.5 (14.4, 23.5) 37 (10, 48) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Jackson County *** 20.9 (14.9, 28.8) 24 (2, 48) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Jefferson County *** 25.6 (23.4, 27.8) 10 (3, 21) 114 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Lamar County *** 33.3 (20.4, 53.4) 1 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Lauderdale County *** 14.1 (10.4, 18.8) 47 (27, 48) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Lawrence County *** 18.5 (11.1, 29.3) 36 (2, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Lee County *** 25.1 (20.4, 30.7) 11 (1, 36) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Limestone County *** 16.7 (12.4, 22.3) 44 (13, 48) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Macon County *** 27.4 (16.6, 44.0) 5 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Madison County *** 19.5 (16.9, 22.3) 31 (14, 43) 45 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Marengo County *** 29.6 (17.8, 46.9) 3 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Marion County *** 26.9 (18.1, 39.3) 6 (1, 45) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Marshall County *** 13.3 (9.4, 18.3) 48 (26, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Mobile County *** 23.4 (20.8, 26.3) 14 (5, 31) 62 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Monroe County *** 26.3 (16.5, 40.9) 7 (1, 48) 5
*
*
Montgomery County *** 28.0 (24.2, 32.2) 4 (1, 22) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Morgan County *** 24.7 (20.0, 30.3) 12 (1, 37) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Pike County *** 23.6 (14.9, 36.0) 13 (1, 48) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Randolph County *** 19.6 (11.1, 32.9) 29 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Russell County *** 26.1 (19.1, 34.9) 9 (1, 43) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Shelby County *** 17.8 (14.6, 21.4) 42 (17, 47) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
St. Clair County *** 14.4 (10.2, 19.8) 46 (21, 48) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Talladega County *** 23.0 (17.6, 29.7) 15 (2, 44) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Tallapoosa County *** 21.6 (14.7, 31.1) 20 (1, 48) 7
*
*
Tuscaloosa County *** 21.5 (17.8, 25.9) 21 (5, 42) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Walker County *** 17.9 (12.9, 24.6) 40 (7, 48) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Winston County *** 18.8 (11.2, 30.7) 32 (2, 48) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.3)
Barbour County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/02/2022 7:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Barbour, Bibb, Bullock, Cherokee, Choctaw, Clay, Cleburne, Conecuh, Coosa, Crenshaw, Fayette, Greene, Hale, Lowndes, Perry, Pickens, Sumter, Washington, Wilcox

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top