Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 20.4 (19.7, 21.1) N/A 710 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Hale County Urban No 42.9 (25.6, 67.9) 1 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Wilcox County Rural No 40.2 (22.7, 67.8) 2 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Lamar County Rural No 37.3 (21.4, 61.3) 3 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Clarke County Rural No 33.2 (22.1, 48.6) 4 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Butler County Rural No 31.9 (18.9, 50.8) 5 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Macon County Urban No 31.1 (18.4, 50.1) 6 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Monroe County Rural No 28.3 (17.0, 45.2) 7 (1, 49) 4
*
*
Marion County Rural No 28.2 (19.2, 40.6) 8 (1, 45) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.7)
Marengo County Rural No 27.1 (15.8, 44.1) 9 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Russell County Urban No 26.4 (19.4, 35.2) 10 (2, 43) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Dallas County Rural No 25.9 (17.5, 37.2) 11 (2, 47) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 25.0 (21.5, 29.0) 12 (5, 29) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
DeKalb County Rural No 24.0 (17.8, 31.8) 13 (3, 45) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Talladega County Rural No 23.3 (17.8, 30.1) 14 (4, 45) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Jackson County Rural No 23.1 (16.5, 31.7) 15 (3, 48) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Escambia County Rural No 23.0 (15.4, 33.5) 16 (2, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Lee County Urban No 22.9 (18.7, 27.8) 17 (5, 41) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.7)
Mobile County Urban No 22.6 (20.1, 25.3) 18 (8, 34) 63 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Pickens County Urban No 22.5 (12.6, 38.2) 19 (2, 49) 3
*
*
Colbert County Urban No 22.3 (16.1, 30.3) 20 (4, 47) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 21.7 (19.8, 23.8) 21 (11, 34) 102 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 21.6 (14.6, 31.2) 22 (4, 49) 7
*
*
Pike County Rural No 21.4 (13.0, 33.4) 23 (3, 49) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.6)
Chilton County Urban No 21.2 (14.3, 30.5) 24 (4, 49) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.6)
Etowah County Urban No 21.2 (16.7, 26.6) 25 (7, 46) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Geneva County Urban No 20.6 (12.6, 32.5) 26 (3, 49) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.9)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 20.2 (16.8, 24.2) 27 (10, 45) 26 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 12.1)
Franklin County Rural No 20.1 (12.4, 31.3) 28 (4, 49) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Dale County Rural No 19.7 (13.5, 28.1) 29 (5, 49) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Covington County Rural No 19.6 (12.9, 29.1) 30 (4, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Elmore County Urban No 19.6 (14.7, 25.7) 31 (7, 48) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Chambers County Rural No 19.5 (12.6, 29.5) 32 (4, 49) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Morgan County Urban No 19.3 (15.2, 24.2) 33 (10, 48) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Lawrence County Urban No 19.1 (11.7, 29.9) 34 (4, 49) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.7)
Calhoun County Urban No 19.1 (14.9, 24.1) 35 (10, 48) 16 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 1.9)
Madison County Urban No 18.3 (16.0, 21.0) 36 (18, 46) 46 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Baldwin County Urban No 18.3 (15.6, 21.5) 37 (17, 47) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Marshall County Rural No 18.1 (13.8, 23.5) 38 (11, 49) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Lauderdale County Urban No 17.4 (13.1, 22.7) 39 (14, 49) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
St. Clair County Urban No 17.2 (12.8, 22.8) 40 (13, 49) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Houston County Urban No 17.0 (13.1, 21.8) 41 (16, 49) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Limestone County Urban No 17.0 (12.8, 22.2) 42 (14, 49) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Blount County Urban No 16.8 (11.6, 23.8) 43 (10, 49) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Shelby County Urban No 16.5 (13.7, 19.9) 44 (22, 49) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.4)
Walker County Urban No 16.3 (11.5, 22.8) 45 (13, 49) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Cherokee County Rural No 16.3 (9.4, 27.7) 46 (6, 49) 3
*
*
Cullman County Rural Yes 14.5 (10.4, 19.8) 47 (21, 49) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Coffee County Rural Yes 13.7 (9.0, 20.4) 48 (19, 49) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.9)
Autauga County Urban Yes 13.0 (8.4, 19.4) 49 (22, 49) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Barbour County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 4:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top