Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Brain & ONS, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A *** 4.8 (4.6, 5.1) N/A 307 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 0.3)
United States N/A *** 4.4 (4.4, 4.4) N/A 17,637 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.1)
Tuscaloosa County Urban *** 2.4 (1.6, 3.5) 30 (25, 30) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Montgomery County Urban *** 3.6 (2.6, 4.9) 29 (14, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Shelby County Urban *** 3.8 (2.8, 5.0) 28 (13, 30) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 2.8)
Calhoun County Urban *** 4.0 (2.6, 5.9) 27 (7, 30) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.1)
Walker County Urban *** 4.0 (2.3, 6.5) 26 (4, 30) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Marshall County Rural *** 4.1 (2.5, 6.2) 25 (6, 30) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.2)
Autauga County Urban *** 4.2 (2.4, 7.0) 24 (3, 30) 3
*
*
Elmore County Urban *** 4.4 (2.8, 6.7) 23 (5, 30) 5
*
*
Houston County Urban *** 4.5 (3.0, 6.5) 22 (4, 30) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.6)
Madison County Urban *** 4.5 (3.7, 5.5) 21 (10, 29) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.7)
Jefferson County Urban *** 4.8 (4.1, 5.6) 20 (9, 26) 38 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3)
Mobile County Urban *** 4.9 (4.1, 5.9) 19 (7, 27) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Cullman County Rural *** 5.1 (3.4, 7.5) 18 (2, 29) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.3)
Russell County Urban *** 5.2 (2.9, 8.4) 17 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Limestone County Urban *** 5.2 (3.5, 7.4) 16 (2, 29) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.4)
Lee County Urban *** 5.2 (3.7, 7.0) 15 (3, 29) 9
*
*
Dale County Rural *** 5.3 (3.1, 8.7) 14 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Baldwin County Urban *** 5.4 (4.3, 6.8) 13 (4, 26) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.9)
Talladega County Rural *** 5.7 (3.9, 8.1) 12 (1, 29) 7
*
*
Chilton County Urban *** 5.9 (3.3, 9.8) 11 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 6.0 (3.6, 9.5) 10 (1, 29) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Morgan County Urban *** 6.0 (4.4, 8.0) 9 (1, 26) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 3.0)
DeKalb County Rural *** 6.3 (4.2, 9.1) 8 (1, 28) 6
*
*
Blount County Urban *** 6.5 (4.1, 9.8) 7 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Etowah County Urban *** 6.6 (4.8, 9.0) 6 (1, 24) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.9)
St. Clair County Urban *** 6.9 (4.9, 9.5) 5 (1, 25) 8
*
*
Colbert County Urban *** 7.1 (4.5, 10.6) 4 (1, 28) 5
*
*
Lauderdale County Urban *** 7.1 (5.1, 9.8) 3 (1, 23) 9 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.3, 3.7)
Marion County Rural *** 7.8 (4.5, 12.9) 2 (1, 29) 4
*
*
Coffee County Rural *** 7.8 (5.0, 11.6) 1 (1, 26) 5
*
*
Barbour County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chambers County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Escambia County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallapoosa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/09/2024 11:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top