Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Alabama by County
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | N/A | *** | 4.5 (4.3, 4.8) | N/A | 289 | falling | -2.9 (-3.8, -2.3) |
United States | N/A | *** | 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) | N/A | 20,108 | falling | -2.1 (-2.2, -2.1) |
Talladega County | Rural | *** | 4.7 (3.0, 7.1) | 15 (1, 25) | 5 | stable | -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0) |
Lee County | Urban | *** | 5.0 (3.6, 6.9) | 8 (1, 25) | 8 | stable | -1.5 (-3.2, 0.6) |
Limestone County | Urban | *** | 5.1 (3.4, 7.2) | 7 (1, 25) | 6 | falling | -1.5 (-2.6, -0.2) |
Montgomery County | Urban | *** | 4.6 (3.5, 5.9) | 18 (3, 24) | 12 | falling | -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3) |
Calhoun County | Urban | *** | 4.7 (3.3, 6.6) | 16 (1, 25) | 7 | falling | -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6) |
Marshall County | Rural | *** | 4.4 (2.9, 6.5) | 21 (1, 25) | 5 | falling | -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2) |
Houston County | Urban | *** | 5.0 (3.4, 7.0) | 11 (1, 25) | 7 | stable | -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0) |
Morgan County | Urban | *** | 4.8 (3.4, 6.7) | 12 (1, 25) | 8 | falling | -1.8 (-3.1, -0.3) |
Cullman County | Rural | *** | 4.8 (3.2, 7.0) | 13 (1, 25) | 6 | falling | -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5) |
Jefferson County | Urban | *** | 4.7 (4.1, 5.5) | 17 (4, 22) | 38 | falling | -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4) |
Mobile County | Urban | *** | 5.0 (4.2, 6.0) | 9 (2, 21) | 25 | falling | -2.1 (-3.1, -1.2) |
Walker County | Urban | *** | 6.2 (4.1, 9.2) | 1 (1, 24) | 6 | falling | -2.4 (-14.7, -0.8) |
Lauderdale County | Urban | *** | 3.3 (2.0, 5.1) | 25 (9, 25) | 5 | falling | -2.6 (-4.1, -1.2) |
Shelby County | Urban | *** | 3.9 (2.9, 5.1) | 23 (7, 25) | 11 | falling | -2.7 (-4.3, -0.7) |
Tuscaloosa County | Urban | *** | 5.7 (4.4, 7.3) | 4 (1, 21) | 13 | falling | -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5) |
Etowah County | Urban | *** | 5.1 (3.5, 7.1) | 6 (1, 24) | 7 | falling | -3.5 (-11.4, -2.1) |
Madison County | Urban | *** | 4.2 (3.4, 5.2) | 22 (6, 24) | 19 | falling | -3.9 (-10.0, -2.4) |
Baldwin County | Urban | *** | 4.5 (3.5, 5.7) | 19 (4, 24) | 15 | falling | -4.2 (-7.6, -2.5) |
Jackson County | Rural | *** | 4.8 (2.8, 7.9) | 14 (1, 25) | 4 | falling | -5.8 (-28.6, -1.4) |
St. Clair County | Urban | *** | 3.3 (2.0, 5.2) | 24 (7, 25) | 4 | falling | -8.1 (-34.2, -3.9) |
Blount County | Urban | *** | 4.5 (2.6, 7.3) | 20 (1, 25) | 4 |
|
|
Coffee County | Rural | *** | 5.2 (3.0, 8.3) | 5 (1, 25) | 4 |
|
|
Covington County | Rural | *** | 6.1 (3.4, 10.3) | 2 (1, 25) | 3 |
|
|
DeKalb County | Rural | *** | 5.0 (3.1, 7.7) | 10 (1, 25) | 4 |
|
|
Tallapoosa County | Rural | *** | 5.9 (3.3, 9.9) | 3 (1, 25) | 4 |
|
|
Autauga County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Barbour County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bibb County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bullock County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Butler County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Chambers County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cherokee County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Chilton County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Choctaw County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Clarke County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cleburne County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Colbert County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Conecuh County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Coosa County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Crenshaw County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Dale County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Elmore County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Escambia County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Fayette County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Geneva County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Greene County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hale County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Henry County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lamar County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lowndes County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Macon County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Marengo County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Marion County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Monroe County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Perry County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Pickens County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Pike County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Randolph County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Russell County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sumter County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Wilcox County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Winston County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 10:03 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 10:03 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.