Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Leukemia, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A *** 5.9 (5.7, 6.2) N/A 369 falling falling trend -2.8 (-6.6, -1.4)
United States N/A *** 5.9 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,472 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Walker County Urban *** 6.1 (3.9, 9.1) 13 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Tuscaloosa County Urban *** 4.6 (3.4, 6.0) 30 (11, 32) 11 falling falling trend -6.9 (-30.9, -2.0)
Tallapoosa County Rural *** 7.1 (4.3, 11.2) 6 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.1)
Talladega County Rural *** 5.4 (3.5, 7.9) 25 (2, 32) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
St. Clair County Urban *** 6.0 (4.1, 8.4) 16 (1, 32) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Shelby County Urban *** 4.5 (3.4, 5.8) 32 (14, 32) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.2)
Russell County Urban *** 6.6 (4.0, 10.3) 11 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.3)
Morgan County Urban *** 6.7 (5.0, 8.8) 10 (1, 30) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Montgomery County Urban *** 4.8 (3.7, 6.2) 29 (10, 32) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Mobile County Urban *** 7.4 (6.3, 8.5) 4 (1, 18) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Marshall County Rural *** 5.5 (3.8, 7.8) 24 (3, 32) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Marion County Rural *** 6.9 (3.9, 11.7) 7 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Madison County Urban *** 5.7 (4.8, 6.8) 21 (6, 30) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Limestone County Urban *** 5.8 (4.0, 8.1) 20 (2, 32) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.8)
Lee County Urban *** 6.7 (5.0, 8.8) 9 (1, 29) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.4)
Lauderdale County Urban *** 5.3 (3.6, 7.5) 26 (3, 32) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Jefferson County Urban *** 6.0 (5.2, 6.8) 17 (6, 26) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jackson County Rural *** 7.6 (4.9, 11.4) 2 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Houston County Urban *** 5.0 (3.4, 7.2) 27 (5, 32) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Etowah County Urban *** 7.5 (5.6, 10.0) 3 (1, 26) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Escambia County Rural *** 8.4 (5.3, 13.0) 1 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Elmore County Urban *** 4.8 (3.1, 7.3) 28 (4, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.7)
DeKalb County Rural *** 5.7 (3.7, 8.5) 22 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Dale County Rural *** 5.9 (3.6, 9.4) 19 (1, 32) 4
*
*
Cullman County Rural *** 6.0 (4.1, 8.6) 15 (1, 32) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Covington County Rural *** 5.7 (3.2, 9.6) 23 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Colbert County Urban *** 7.1 (4.7, 10.5) 5 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.3)
Chambers County Rural *** 6.0 (3.4, 10.2) 14 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Calhoun County Urban *** 6.8 (5.0, 9.1) 8 (1, 30) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Blount County Urban *** 6.5 (4.2, 9.7) 12 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.1)
Baldwin County Urban *** 5.9 (4.8, 7.3) 18 (4, 29) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.9, 0.0)
Autauga County Urban *** 4.5 (2.5, 7.4) 31 (4, 32) 3 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.5)
Barbour County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chilton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coffee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top