Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

Breast, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 20.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama No 21.8 (21.1, 22.6) 679 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
United States No 20.9 (20.8, 21.0) 41,135 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Dallas County No 38.0 (27.9, 50.7) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.4)
Escambia County No 34.0 (24.6, 46.3) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Washington County No 32.7 (19.9, 51.8) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2)
Cherokee County No 31.8 (20.9, 46.9) 6
*
*
Macon County No 30.4 (18.9, 47.4) 4
*
*
Lamar County No 29.5 (16.9, 49.5) 3
*
*
Houston County No 29.0 (23.5, 35.5) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Lee County No 28.6 (23.2, 34.9) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.3)
Pike County No 27.0 (17.5, 40.1) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Henry County No 26.8 (15.9, 43.7) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.9)
Barbour County No 26.6 (15.4, 42.8) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.8)
Jefferson County No 26.1 (24.0, 28.5) 112 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Tallapoosa County No 25.4 (17.8, 35.6) 8
*
*
Russell County No 24.0 (17.2, 32.8) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Jackson County No 23.8 (17.2, 32.5) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.1)
Tuscaloosa County No 23.2 (19.2, 27.8) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Morgan County No 22.9 (18.4, 28.4) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Mobile County No 22.9 (20.3, 25.8) 59 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Autauga County No 22.6 (15.8, 31.6) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Baldwin County No 22.5 (19.0, 26.5) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Marion County No 22.4 (14.8, 33.3) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.5)
Talladega County No 22.3 (16.9, 29.0) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Butler County No 22.1 (12.7, 36.5) 4
*
*
Cullman County No 21.8 (16.5, 28.3) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Calhoun County No 21.7 (17.3, 26.9) 18 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 1.1)
Colbert County No 21.6 (15.5, 29.5) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Etowah County No 20.9 (16.2, 26.6) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Chambers County No 20.8 (13.4, 31.2) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.4)
Geneva County No 20.7 (12.2, 33.5) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.5)
Chilton County No 20.7 (13.6, 30.4) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.5)
Montgomery County Yes 20.2 (16.9, 23.9) 28 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Walker County Yes 20.1 (14.8, 26.9) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Lawrence County Yes 19.8 (12.0, 31.1) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.8)
Elmore County Yes 19.7 (14.4, 26.3) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Dale County Yes 19.5 (13.2, 28.0) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Clarke County Yes 19.5 (11.4, 31.8) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.1)
Coffee County Yes 19.4 (13.1, 27.7) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.1)
DeKalb County Yes 18.9 (13.5, 25.9) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Shelby County Yes 18.0 (14.7, 21.9) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Covington County Yes 17.9 (11.2, 27.5) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.0)
Lauderdale County Yes 17.5 (13.1, 22.9) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
St. Clair County Yes 17.3 (12.6, 23.2) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Madison County Yes 15.7 (13.4, 18.4) 33 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Limestone County Yes 15.7 (11.3, 21.4) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
Franklin County Yes 15.5 (8.9, 25.4) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.5)
Blount County Yes 14.5 (9.6, 21.3) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.1)
Marshall County Yes 12.7 (9.0, 17.5) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Bibb County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2019 9:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top