Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Arizona by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arizona N/A No 155.5 (153.8, 157.2) N/A 6,814 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Apache County Rural No 146.6 (128.7, 166.2) 12 (5, 15) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Cochise County Urban No 177.6 (165.7, 190.2) 4 (2, 7) 175 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Coconino County Urban No 135.8 (122.8, 149.7) 15 (10, 15) 88 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Gila County Rural No 164.9 (148.3, 183.2) 6 (2, 13) 85 falling falling trend -2.6 (-9.3, -1.5)
Graham County Rural No 157.2 (132.6, 185.0) 9 (2, 15) 30 stable stable trend 8.3 (-2.6, 15.5)
Greenlee County Rural No 205.4 (147.7, 277.2) 1 (1, 15) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
La Paz County 3 Rural No 179.4 (149.2, 215.9) 3 (1, 13) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Maricopa County Urban No 151.5 (149.3, 153.8) 10 (8, 12) 3,587 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
Mohave County Urban No 200.1 (191.2, 209.3) 2 (1, 3) 448 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Navajo County Rural No 163.9 (149.9, 179.0) 7 (3, 12) 110 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Pima County Urban No 159.4 (155.1, 163.8) 8 (5, 10) 1,100 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
Pinal County Urban No 147.9 (141.7, 154.4) 11 (8, 14) 447 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Santa Cruz County Rural No 138.5 (119.7, 159.7) 14 (6, 15) 40 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -0.9)
Yavapai County Urban No 171.7 (163.7, 180.1) 5 (2, 8) 411 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Yuma County 3 Urban No 140.5 (131.5, 149.9) 13 (10, 15) 195 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 11:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
3 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top