Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Arkansas Yes 65.2 (63.9, 66.5) 2,064 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States Yes 51.3 (51.2, 51.4) 177,172 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Calhoun County Yes 93.9 (61.5, 139.8) 6 stable stable trend 14.6 (-2.2, 34.4)
Sharp County Yes 94.1 (74.9, 117.4) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.4)
Grant County Yes 80.7 (64.0, 100.9) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 1.9)
Montgomery County Yes 65.9 (44.1, 96.2) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Prairie County Yes 80.7 (55.2, 115.1) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Lincoln County Yes 73.1 (54.5, 96.5) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Phillips County Yes 105.0 (85.1, 128.3) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Monroe County Yes 101.5 (73.0, 139.1) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Arkansas County Yes 81.5 (64.8, 101.5) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Clay County Yes 90.4 (71.5, 113.4) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Cleburne County Yes 64.4 (51.8, 79.7) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Jackson County Yes 76.3 (59.8, 96.5) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Pike County Yes 59.1 (41.7, 82.2) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Baxter County Yes 71.8 (60.5, 84.8) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Miller County Yes 79.6 (68.0, 92.6) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Mississippi County Yes 95.1 (82.5, 109.2) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Dallas County Yes 85.8 (59.9, 120.6) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6)
Lawrence County Yes 70.8 (54.8, 90.7) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Clark County Yes 65.2 (50.6, 83.0) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Columbia County Yes 72.9 (58.2, 90.5) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Franklin County Yes 70.0 (54.5, 89.0) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Greene County Yes 66.8 (56.5, 78.5) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Howard County Yes 67.8 (49.8, 90.7) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Perry County Yes 68.9 (48.6, 95.8) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Poinsett County Yes 99.1 (82.8, 118.0) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Randolph County Yes 74.3 (57.7, 94.7) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Stone County Yes 80.3 (59.7, 106.7) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Cross County Yes 97.6 (78.5, 120.3) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Independence County Yes 70.8 (59.1, 84.3) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Saline County Yes 59.5 (53.5, 66.2) 73 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Scott County Yes 76.2 (54.9, 103.8) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Jefferson County Yes 74.3 (65.9, 83.6) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Ashley County Yes 77.5 (62.2, 95.8) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Craighead County Yes 63.9 (56.9, 71.5) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Drew County Yes 75.6 (58.3, 96.7) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Hot Spring County Yes 72.5 (60.7, 86.1) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Little River County Yes 61.4 (44.6, 83.5) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Fulton County Yes 45.9 (31.6, 65.8) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Marion County Yes 68.6 (52.0, 89.8) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Pope County Yes 66.3 (57.5, 76.2) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Searcy County Yes 71.9 (50.2, 102.1) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Cleveland County Yes 78.2 (54.8, 109.4) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.6)
Hempstead County Yes 57.2 (44.0, 73.3) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Union County Yes 82.5 (70.9, 95.7) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Benton County Yes 52.2 (48.1, 56.5) 121 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Crawford County Yes 67.8 (59.1, 77.4) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Desha County Yes 53.9 (37.4, 75.8) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Polk County Yes 70.9 (55.2, 89.9) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Faulkner County Yes 54.7 (48.7, 61.3) 61 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Lee County Yes 76.0 (54.1, 104.7) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Logan County Yes 76.8 (61.6, 95.1) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Garland County Yes 62.1 (55.4, 69.5) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Lonoke County Yes 62.6 (54.6, 71.5) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Crittenden County Yes 81.8 (71.0, 93.9) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Nevada County Yes 88.8 (62.5, 123.2) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Ouachita County Yes 79.9 (65.2, 97.2) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Sebastian County Yes 61.7 (55.7, 68.1) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Sevier County Yes 53.2 (38.2, 72.1) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Conway County Yes 60.8 (47.2, 77.6) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Washington County Yes 53.1 (48.6, 57.9) 104 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
White County Yes 64.7 (56.9, 73.2) 52 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Yell County Yes 69.5 (54.9, 87.0) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Boone County Yes 63.5 (52.4, 76.5) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Chicot County Yes 76.0 (55.2, 102.7) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Lafayette County Yes 58.2 (36.4, 90.0) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Madison County Yes 69.4 (52.8, 90.2) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Newton County Yes 62.7 (38.7, 97.0) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.7)
Van Buren County Yes 59.3 (44.7, 78.1) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Bradley County Yes 59.8 (41.7, 83.9) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Johnson County Yes 60.5 (47.7, 75.7) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Pulaski County Yes 57.8 (54.5, 61.2) 246 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Woodruff County Yes 70.8 (45.6, 106.3) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
St. Francis County Yes 71.8 (58.6, 87.2) 22 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Carroll County Yes 49.9 (39.0, 63.1) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Izard County Yes 56.6 (40.7, 77.8) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/07/2020 4:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top