Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas N/A No 562.3 (556.0, 568.7) N/A 6,210 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Pulaski County Urban No 508.7 (491.6, 526.3) 70 (56, 74) 693 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.6, -1.5)
Benton County Urban No 493.6 (472.3, 515.7) 73 (59, 75) 410 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Washington County Urban No 494.2 (469.9, 519.5) 72 (57, 75) 317 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.4)
Garland County Urban No 515.7 (487.1, 545.7) 66 (48, 74) 251 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.0, -1.2)
Saline County Urban No 515.8 (486.8, 546.1) 65 (48, 75) 242 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Sebastian County Urban No 529.1 (499.2, 560.2) 62 (42, 73) 240 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -1.2)
Craighead County Urban No 563.1 (527.0, 600.9) 52 (27, 68) 186 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.8, -0.3)
Faulkner County Urban No 502.0 (469.5, 536.0) 71 (50, 75) 183 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
White County Rural No 581.0 (541.1, 623.1) 44 (20, 64) 160 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Jefferson County Rural No 625.9 (582.2, 672.1) 28 (10, 54) 158 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Baxter County Rural No 570.8 (529.0, 615.1) 48 (22, 68) 147 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Crawford County Urban No 609.3 (564.0, 657.3) 30 (12, 59) 137 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Lonoke County Urban No 583.5 (539.3, 630.5) 42 (17, 65) 133 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Pope County Rural No 559.4 (515.8, 605.7) 55 (25, 71) 124 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Crittenden County Urban No 671.0 (613.0, 733.0) 15 (3, 45) 102 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Miller County Urban No 641.4 (585.5, 701.2) 20 (5, 54) 99 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Union County Rural No 638.3 (581.9, 698.7) 22 (6, 55) 97 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Greene County Rural No 595.7 (543.4, 651.6) 34 (12, 65) 97 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Boone County Rural No 569.4 (518.3, 624.2) 49 (19, 70) 93 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Mississippi County Rural No 682.4 (620.0, 749.4) 13 (1, 41) 92 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Hot Spring County Rural No 585.4 (528.4, 646.9) 40 (12, 71) 79 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Cleburne County Rural No 562.8 (506.4, 623.7) 53 (17, 73) 77 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Carroll County Rural No 550.1 (494.0, 611.0) 57 (21, 75) 73 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Independence County Rural No 479.7 (430.3, 533.3) 75 (50, 75) 70 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Poinsett County Urban No 750.3 (670.9, 836.5) 2 (1, 28) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.5, 2.6)
Ouachita County Rural No 646.0 (575.2, 723.2) 18 (3, 61) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Sharp County Rural No 681.7 (606.8, 763.5) 14 (1, 52) 62 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Logan County Rural No 626.8 (555.8, 704.4) 26 (5, 65) 57 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Marion County Rural No 578.7 (510.8, 653.4) 47 (11, 73) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Johnson County Rural No 583.6 (515.9, 657.7) 41 (10, 74) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Arkansas County Rural No 758.3 (669.5, 855.7) 1 (1, 31) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Ashley County Rural No 642.5 (567.8, 724.5) 19 (3, 63) 54 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Polk County Rural No 583.3 (514.2, 659.3) 43 (9, 74) 53 falling falling trend -13.4 (-24.4, -1.4)
Columbia County Rural No 626.8 (551.9, 709.1) 27 (4, 67) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Van Buren County Rural No 606.6 (532.8, 688.0) 32 (6, 70) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
St. Francis County Rural No 602.0 (528.1, 683.3) 33 (7, 73) 49 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -1.5)
Lawrence County Rural No 735.8 (645.9, 834.8) 6 (1, 40) 49 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.8)
Randolph County Rural No 631.4 (553.1, 717.9) 25 (3, 65) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Phillips County Rural No 705.6 (617.3, 803.0) 11 (1, 48) 48 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Hempstead County Rural No 587.3 (514.0, 668.2) 38 (9, 74) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Clay County Rural No 718.2 (628.4, 817.3) 9 (1, 47) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Cross County Rural No 718.7 (628.7, 818.1) 8 (1, 43) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.4, -0.3)
Clark County Rural No 637.8 (557.2, 726.8) 23 (2, 65) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Conway County Rural No 510.0 (444.3, 582.7) 69 (26, 75) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Yell County Rural No 561.0 (488.6, 641.2) 54 (13, 75) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Grant County Urban No 610.6 (531.3, 698.4) 29 (6, 72) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Franklin County Rural No 588.9 (511.7, 674.5) 35 (7, 74) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Madison County Urban No 607.7 (527.6, 696.6) 31 (5, 72) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 660.6 (573.2, 757.6) 17 (1, 63) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Fulton County Rural No 635.7 (548.2, 733.4) 24 (2, 68) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.9)
Stone County Rural No 580.7 (501.2, 669.5) 45 (9, 75) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 2.0)
Izard County Rural No 545.1 (471.0, 627.9) 59 (16, 75) 40 stable stable trend -1.5 (-12.0, 1.1)
Drew County Rural No 585.6 (505.0, 675.6) 39 (7, 75) 38 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Chicot County Rural No 750.3 (640.4, 873.8) 3 (1, 46) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Scott County Rural No 691.0 (584.5, 811.4) 12 (1, 66) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Desha County Rural No 640.0 (538.6, 755.2) 21 (1, 73) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Little River County Urban No 513.5 (430.3, 608.3) 68 (17, 75) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Searcy County Rural No 661.8 (553.9, 785.1) 16 (1, 69) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Lee County Rural No 745.1 (623.4, 883.9) 4 (1, 53) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Sevier County Rural No 538.0 (449.7, 638.5) 61 (10, 75) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Howard County Rural No 521.4 (434.6, 620.4) 64 (15, 75) 26 falling falling trend -3.4 (-12.1, -1.4)
Perry County Urban No 579.0 (481.9, 690.1) 46 (4, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 587.7 (488.9, 700.5) 37 (4, 75) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Pike County Rural No 568.3 (472.6, 677.9) 50 (7, 75) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Montgomery County Rural No 514.7 (426.6, 616.0) 67 (15, 75) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Monroe County Rural No 716.9 (590.2, 862.8) 10 (1, 66) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Dallas County Rural No 720.2 (590.8, 869.7) 7 (1, 65) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Newton County Rural No 587.7 (483.1, 708.9) 36 (4, 75) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Prairie County Rural No 527.8 (432.7, 638.0) 63 (12, 75) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Bradley County Rural No 491.7 (400.5, 597.5) 74 (18, 75) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Nevada County Rural No 553.5 (451.0, 672.7) 56 (6, 75) 21 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Cleveland County Rural No 546.6 (439.3, 672.2) 58 (5, 75) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Lafayette County Rural No 539.0 (431.4, 665.9) 60 (6, 75) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Woodruff County Rural No 567.6 (454.4, 701.4) 51 (3, 75) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Calhoun County Rural No 742.3 (587.5, 925.7) 5 (1, 71) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top