Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas N/A No 936.2 (924.2, 948.4) N/A 4,685 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Bradley County Rural No 781.5 (615.0, 979.0) 75 (18, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Howard County Rural No 809.2 (650.8, 994.4) 74 (17, 75) 18 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.2, -2.1)
Independence County Rural No 814.1 (719.3, 917.9) 73 (37, 75) 54 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Faulkner County Urban No 827.7 (765.3, 893.8) 72 (46, 75) 133 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.5, -1.0)
Garland County Urban No 831.0 (779.4, 885.2) 71 (49, 75) 195 falling falling trend -3.7 (-8.3, -1.7)
Conway County Rural No 831.8 (707.8, 971.1) 70 (26, 75) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Prairie County Rural No 847.9 (675.2, 1,051.3) 69 (9, 75) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Montgomery County Rural No 856.4 (694.1, 1,045.2) 68 (12, 75) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Sebastian County Urban No 858.6 (802.0, 918.2) 67 (43, 74) 174 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -1.4)
Benton County Urban No 859.7 (817.5, 903.5) 66 (47, 73) 316 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Pulaski County Urban No 865.4 (832.1, 899.8) 65 (47, 72) 524 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -1.4)
Saline County Urban No 866.9 (811.5, 925.0) 64 (41, 74) 186 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Washington County Urban No 869.3 (820.7, 920.0) 63 (42, 73) 244 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -1.1)
Cleburne County Rural No 870.6 (773.5, 976.4) 62 (25, 75) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lafayette County Rural No 872.8 (674.8, 1,110.7) 61 (3, 75) 13 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.1)
Carroll County Rural No 876.2 (773.5, 988.7) 60 (22, 75) 54 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Little River County Urban No 886.1 (727.3, 1,069.3) 59 (9, 75) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Nevada County Rural No 894.3 (705.0, 1,118.9) 58 (4, 75) 15 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Stone County Rural No 898.3 (759.5, 1,055.0) 57 (11, 75) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.0, -0.7)
Franklin County Rural No 905.2 (765.8, 1,062.5) 56 (10, 75) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Izard County Rural No 906.4 (769.7, 1,060.3) 55 (10, 75) 31 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Newton County Rural No 910.7 (725.9, 1,128.4) 54 (4, 75) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Perry County Urban No 920.0 (741.0, 1,129.3) 53 (3, 75) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Pike County Rural No 922.1 (743.4, 1,130.6) 52 (5, 75) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Marion County Rural No 929.2 (807.3, 1,064.4) 51 (9, 75) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-4.3, -0.6)
Greene County Rural No 930.6 (833.9, 1,035.5) 50 (18, 74) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Pope County Rural No 936.7 (852.7, 1,026.6) 49 (19, 71) 93 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Baxter County Rural No 941.8 (868.2, 1,019.9) 48 (20, 69) 121 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Woodruff County Rural No 942.2 (730.2, 1,196.3) 47 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Hot Spring County Rural No 947.7 (840.5, 1,064.9) 46 (11, 73) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Craighead County Urban No 948.5 (878.8, 1,022.2) 45 (20, 68) 139 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.8, -0.4)
White County Rural No 948.8 (872.8, 1,029.5) 44 (18, 69) 116 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Sevier County Rural No 966.7 (790.3, 1,170.6) 43 (2, 75) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Boone County Rural No 968.3 (871.7, 1,072.7) 42 (13, 69) 74 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Johnson County Rural No 971.1 (841.9, 1,114.4) 41 (7, 74) 41 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Cleveland County Rural No 971.5 (764.1, 1,217.9) 40 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Hempstead County Rural No 974.3 (835.7, 1,129.3) 39 (5, 74) 36 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Grant County Urban No 987.5 (837.8, 1,156.3) 38 (4, 75) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
St. Francis County Rural No 998.8 (857.4, 1,156.9) 37 (3, 73) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-11.4, -1.0)
Union County Rural No 1,001.1 (897.3, 1,113.6) 36 (8, 66) 69 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Polk County Rural No 1,004.3 (872.9, 1,149.9) 35 (4, 71) 43 falling falling trend -11.6 (-20.4, -0.7)
Columbia County Rural No 1,006.3 (868.1, 1,160.1) 34 (4, 73) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Crawford County Urban No 1,006.4 (919.7, 1,099.0) 33 (8, 63) 101 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Lonoke County Urban No 1,006.6 (918.9, 1,100.4) 32 (9, 63) 99 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Yell County Rural No 1,007.0 (863.8, 1,167.1) 31 (3, 73) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Ashley County Rural No 1,016.1 (880.1, 1,167.2) 30 (3, 71) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Miller County Urban No 1,020.7 (916.2, 1,133.8) 29 (5, 63) 71 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Drew County Rural No 1,027.3 (870.8, 1,203.8) 28 (1, 73) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,027.5 (833.8, 1,252.6) 27 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Scott County Rural No 1,032.4 (844.0, 1,250.3) 26 (1, 74) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Logan County Rural No 1,035.8 (900.9, 1,185.2) 25 (2, 68) 43 falling falling trend -2.2 (-9.8, -0.6)
Madison County Urban No 1,036.4 (881.3, 1,210.8) 24 (1, 72) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Van Buren County Rural No 1,037.3 (900.2, 1,189.3) 23 (2, 71) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.5)
Jefferson County Rural No 1,046.4 (962.4, 1,135.7) 22 (7, 53) 118 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Fulton County Rural No 1,050.4 (894.5, 1,225.6) 21 (1, 69) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Randolph County Rural No 1,056.9 (911.2, 1,219.3) 20 (1, 67) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.8)
Dallas County Rural No 1,064.7 (846.3, 1,322.4) 19 (1, 75) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Ouachita County Rural No 1,067.0 (933.7, 1,213.8) 18 (1, 63) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Mississippi County Rural No 1,072.1 (954.9, 1,199.7) 17 (2, 58) 63 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Jackson County Rural No 1,075.5 (912.0, 1,260.0) 16 (1, 71) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Crittenden County Urban No 1,091.1 (979.5, 1,211.9) 15 (1, 52) 72 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Calhoun County Rural No 1,112.9 (837.2, 1,449.9) 14 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Clark County Rural No 1,115.8 (961.5, 1,287.7) 13 (1, 61) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Monroe County Rural No 1,121.6 (894.8, 1,387.9) 12 (1, 74) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Searcy County Rural No 1,136.1 (931.8, 1,371.8) 11 (1, 71) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Chicot County Rural No 1,141.2 (945.8, 1,365.0) 10 (1, 67) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Desha County Rural No 1,144.9 (944.5, 1,375.0) 9 (1, 70) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Lawrence County Rural No 1,162.7 (997.3, 1,347.5) 8 (1, 54) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Clay County Rural No 1,171.5 (1,007.3, 1,354.7) 7 (1, 51) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Sharp County Rural No 1,173.6 (1,033.4, 1,327.5) 6 (1, 44) 51 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Cross County Rural No 1,182.6 (1,012.7, 1,372.8) 5 (1, 51) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.8, -0.2)
Lee County Rural No 1,192.3 (970.7, 1,449.3) 4 (1, 68) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.1)
Phillips County Rural No 1,206.6 (1,037.7, 1,395.2) 3 (1, 49) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Poinsett County Urban No 1,214.2 (1,065.4, 1,378.1) 2 (1, 39) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Arkansas County Rural No 1,222.8 (1,057.9, 1,405.9) 1 (1, 43) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 3:48 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top