Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas Yes 150.3 (147.8, 152.8) N/A 2,981 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
United States Yes 135.7 (135.4, 135.9) N/A 281,450 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Howard County Yes 133.3 (102.6, 171.3) 66 (10, 75) 13 falling falling trend -9.9 (-18.2, -0.7)
Van Buren County Yes 105.4 (83.1, 133.6) 75 (46, 75) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.7)
Logan County No 162.7 (135.4, 194.6) 27 (3, 71) 26 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -0.8)
Garland County Yes 136.6 (125.2, 148.9) 60 (36, 72) 117 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Stone County Yes 146.5 (113.9, 187.3) 52 (3, 75) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Lafayette County Yes 112.0 (76.7, 161.9) 74 (12, 75) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Marion County Yes 142.6 (115.9, 175.5) 54 (7, 75) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Sevier County Yes 136.5 (105.4, 174.3) 61 (9, 75) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Desha County Yes 120.2 (89.0, 159.7) 72 (17, 75) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Izard County Yes 133.7 (105.2, 169.7) 65 (11, 75) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
St. Francis County Yes 147.4 (121.3, 177.9) 48 (4, 74) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Pulaski County Yes 144.0 (137.2, 151.0) 53 (35, 64) 359 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Washington County Yes 128.5 (119.1, 138.5) 69 (48, 74) 141 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Woodruff County Yes 150.5 (110.3, 204.6) 43 (2, 75) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Hempstead County Yes 138.7 (113.5, 168.4) 58 (11, 75) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Clark County Yes 135.8 (110.0, 166.3) 63 (11, 75) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Conway County Yes 141.1 (115.6, 171.2) 57 (10, 75) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Lee County Yes 136.9 (97.0, 189.7) 59 (2, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
White County Yes 155.2 (140.1, 171.7) 39 (12, 64) 79 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Craighead County Yes 146.8 (133.2, 161.4) 49 (21, 69) 89 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Crawford County Yes 148.9 (132.2, 167.3) 46 (14, 70) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Crittenden County No 184.5 (162.7, 208.6) 11 (2, 45) 53 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Drew County Yes 152.0 (122.8, 186.7) 42 (4, 74) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Independence County Yes 131.4 (112.0, 153.5) 67 (27, 75) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Mississippi County No 175.5 (153.2, 200.2) 17 (2, 54) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Prairie County Yes 124.1 (87.6, 173.1) 71 (6, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Saline County Yes 146.7 (134.6, 159.6) 51 (24, 67) 113 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Arkansas County Yes 146.7 (117.8, 181.1) 50 (5, 74) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Ashley County No 175.0 (145.8, 208.8) 18 (2, 67) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Carroll County Yes 148.5 (126.1, 174.5) 47 (10, 73) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Grant County Yes 142.5 (113.8, 176.9) 55 (7, 75) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Greene County Yes 134.7 (116.1, 155.5) 64 (24, 74) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Jefferson County No 169.9 (153.5, 187.6) 20 (5, 51) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Pike County Yes 141.7 (107.2, 185.4) 56 (4, 75) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.1)
Polk County No 166.4 (137.7, 200.1) 24 (2, 69) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Sebastian County Yes 157.0 (144.8, 170.0) 36 (14, 60) 127 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Benton County Yes 131.3 (122.9, 140.2) 68 (47, 73) 183 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Faulkner County Yes 136.4 (123.5, 150.4) 62 (33, 72) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lonoke County Yes 158.0 (141.0, 176.6) 33 (10, 64) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Union County No 185.0 (163.1, 209.3) 10 (2, 45) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Baxter County Yes 158.8 (140.9, 178.9) 32 (9, 64) 70 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Boone County No 167.4 (146.0, 191.4) 22 (4, 63) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Nevada County Yes 161.0 (118.1, 216.3) 29 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Phillips County No 183.6 (151.8, 220.7) 12 (1, 60) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Bradley County No 169.8 (132.5, 215.9) 21 (1, 73) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Chicot County No 180.6 (140.6, 229.9) 14 (1, 71) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Columbia County Yes 150.3 (124.4, 180.5) 44 (6, 74) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Hot Spring County No 171.1 (147.6, 197.7) 19 (2, 63) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Ouachita County Yes 157.0 (131.7, 186.2) 37 (4, 72) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Scott County Yes 160.1 (122.4, 207.4) 31 (2, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Sharp County Yes 156.6 (127.9, 191.0) 38 (3, 73) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Yell County No 176.5 (146.6, 211.1) 16 (2, 67) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Cleveland County No 166.7 (123.2, 222.4) 23 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Pope County Yes 161.0 (143.5, 180.3) 28 (7, 64) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Franklin County Yes 154.2 (125.5, 188.4) 41 (4, 74) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Little River County Yes 118.8 (89.6, 155.9) 73 (16, 75) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Poinsett County No 194.1 (165.4, 226.8) 4 (1, 45) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Clay County No 191.4 (158.3, 230.7) 5 (1, 57) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Dallas County No 185.2 (135.7, 248.8) 9 (1, 73) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Madison County No 180.7 (146.0, 222.0) 13 (1, 66) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Miller County Yes 157.4 (137.0, 180.1) 35 (8, 69) 45 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Johnson County Yes 160.6 (133.6, 191.8) 30 (4, 72) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
Lincoln County No 162.9 (124.1, 211.2) 26 (2, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Searcy County No 186.5 (143.7, 241.5) 7 (1, 71) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Jackson County No 163.4 (132.8, 199.7) 25 (2, 73) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Montgomery County Yes 128.3 (93.1, 175.2) 70 (5, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Calhoun County No 200.9 (141.3, 281.3) 2 (1, 73) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Fulton County Yes 150.0 (116.2, 192.4) 45 (3, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Monroe County No 258.5 (200.4, 330.1) 1 (1, 22) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Newton County Yes 154.3 (112.9, 209.2) 40 (2, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Cleburne County Yes 157.8 (133.7, 185.9) 34 (5, 71) 36 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Randolph County No 178.1 (146.9, 214.7) 15 (1, 65) 25 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Lawrence County No 186.2 (154.0, 224.1) 8 (1, 60) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 1.9)
Perry County No 191.2 (148.2, 244.1) 6 (1, 68) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.8)
Cross County No 194.9 (161.0, 234.5) 3 (1, 55) 24 rising rising trend 7.3 (0.8, 14.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/12/2020 2:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top