Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas No 19.5 (18.6, 20.4) N/A 393 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Pope County Yes 12.3 (7.9, 18.3) 35 (19, 35) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Faulkner County Yes 13.2 (9.6, 17.7) 34 (21, 35) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Washington County Yes 15.2 (12.2, 18.7) 33 (19, 35) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Greene County No 16.1 (10.3, 24.1) 32 (7, 35) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Baxter County No 16.7 (11.2, 24.9) 31 (7, 35) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
White County No 16.8 (12.2, 22.8) 30 (9, 35) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Independence County No 17.1 (10.3, 26.9) 29 (4, 35) 4 stable stable trend 36.9 (-11.8, 112.4)
Saline County No 17.3 (13.4, 22.1) 28 (10, 35) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Ouachita County No 17.4 (10.2, 29.0) 27 (4, 35) 4
*
*
Cleburne County No 17.5 (10.9, 28.5) 26 (4, 35) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Benton County No 18.3 (15.4, 21.7) 25 (11, 33) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Garland County No 19.0 (15.0, 23.9) 24 (8, 33) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Sebastian County No 19.1 (15.0, 24.1) 23 (7, 33) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Logan County No 19.8 (11.3, 33.1) 22 (2, 35) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Craighead County No 19.8 (15.1, 25.6) 21 (6, 34) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Pulaski County No 20.2 (17.7, 22.9) 20 (9, 29) 51 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Lonoke County No 20.4 (14.6, 27.8) 19 (3, 34) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Sharp County No 20.7 (10.9, 37.1) 18 (1, 35) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
Miller County No 21.0 (14.1, 30.3) 17 (2, 35) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 4.8)
Boone County No 21.5 (14.5, 31.3) 16 (2, 35) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Carroll County No 21.8 (13.8, 33.7) 15 (1, 35) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Ashley County No 22.5 (12.8, 37.7) 14 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Crawford County No 22.9 (16.8, 30.5) 13 (2, 32) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Columbia County No 23.2 (13.1, 38.4) 12 (1, 35) 3 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Mississippi County No 23.7 (15.6, 34.5) 11 (1, 34) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Conway County No 24.1 (13.8, 39.9) 10 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Union County No 24.2 (16.5, 34.6) 9 (1, 33) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Hot Spring County No 24.5 (16.2, 36.1) 8 (1, 33) 6
*
*
Jefferson County No 24.7 (18.7, 32.1) 7 (1, 30) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Clay County No 26.9 (15.5, 45.2) 6 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Clark County No 27.2 (15.4, 44.7) 5 (1, 35) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.4)
Crittenden County No 28.1 (19.9, 38.7) 4 (1, 29) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Phillips County No 30.8 (18.0, 49.8) 3 (1, 34) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
St. Francis County No 32.1 (19.7, 49.6) 2 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Johnson County No 32.8 (20.9, 49.3) 1 (1, 30) 5
*
*
Arkansas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bradley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cross County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Desha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Drew County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hempstead County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Izard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Little River County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Poinsett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Searcy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/17/2024 10:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top