Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California *** 140.3 (139.8, 140.8) N/A 59,406 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.6)
United States *** 155.5 (155.3, 155.6) N/A 596,800 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Yuba County *** 197.2 (182.6, 212.7) 1 (1, 5) 142 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Lake County *** 187.7 (175.4, 200.8) 2 (1, 7) 189 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Shasta County *** 179.6 (172.2, 187.3) 3 (1, 7) 471 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Glenn County *** 175.1 (155.3, 196.9) 4 (1, 27) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Butte County *** 168.0 (161.3, 175.0) 5 (3, 15) 503 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Stanislaus County *** 165.7 (160.8, 170.7) 6 (4, 14) 895 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Humboldt County *** 164.1 (155.3, 173.3) 7 (3, 23) 278 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Del Norte County *** 163.6 (145.1, 183.9) 8 (2, 43) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Tehama County *** 162.0 (150.1, 174.7) 9 (3, 30) 143 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Solano County *** 161.9 (156.8, 167.0) 10 (4, 20) 816 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Siskiyou County *** 161.8 (148.5, 176.1) 11 (3, 32) 121 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
San Joaquin County *** 159.7 (155.5, 163.9) 12 (6, 21) 1,143 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Sutter County *** 157.6 (147.3, 168.4) 13 (4, 32) 178 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Plumas County *** 157.4 (137.7, 179.8) 14 (1, 49) 54 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
San Bernardino County *** 156.8 (154.3, 159.4) 15 (9, 22) 3,000 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Merced County *** 156.8 (149.6, 164.2) 16 (5, 27) 368 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Sacramento County *** 155.5 (152.8, 158.3) 17 (10, 24) 2,510 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Tuolumne County *** 155.2 (143.7, 167.4) 18 (4, 38) 147 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Kern County *** 154.6 (150.6, 158.7) 19 (10, 26) 1,163 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Kings County *** 154.0 (144.2, 164.3) 20 (5, 37) 188 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Mendocino County *** 152.0 (142.1, 162.5) 21 (6, 39) 194 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Inyo County *** 151.1 (131.1, 173.8) 22 (2, 53) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Napa County *** 148.9 (141.2, 157.0) 23 (10, 39) 290 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Madera County *** 148.3 (139.8, 157.2) 24 (10, 42) 236 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Calaveras County *** 147.4 (135.5, 160.4) 25 (7, 48) 124 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Riverside County *** 144.7 (142.6, 146.8) 26 (22, 34) 3,715 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Amador County *** 144.7 (131.8, 158.7) 27 (7, 51) 101 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Modoc County *** 144.4 (118.0, 176.4) 28 (2, 56) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Yolo County *** 143.0 (135.5, 150.7) 29 (17, 46) 288 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
San Diego County *** 142.8 (141.1, 144.7) 30 (24, 37) 5,029 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Sonoma County *** 142.5 (138.4, 146.7) 31 (22, 41) 970 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.7)
Fresno County *** 141.9 (138.5, 145.5) 32 (23, 40) 1,307 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Colusa County *** 141.5 (120.3, 165.3) 33 (4, 56) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Tulare County *** 141.1 (135.9, 146.4) 34 (22, 44) 571 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Placer County *** 139.6 (135.1, 144.2) 35 (24, 45) 746 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Mariposa County *** 139.1 (119.6, 161.4) 36 (4, 56) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Nevada County *** 138.7 (130.5, 147.4) 37 (20, 51) 242 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Ventura County *** 138.3 (134.9, 141.7) 38 (28, 45) 1,345 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
El Dorado County *** 137.4 (131.0, 144.1) 39 (24, 50) 371 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
San Luis Obispo County *** 137.3 (132.0, 142.8) 40 (26, 49) 540 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Los Angeles County *** 137.2 (136.2, 138.2) 41 (33, 44) 14,532 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Lassen County *** 135.7 (118.2, 155.0) 42 (8, 56) 46 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Contra Costa County *** 135.6 (132.8, 138.5) 43 (33, 47) 1,809 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Santa Barbara County *** 134.9 (130.3, 139.6) 44 (31, 50) 689 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Alameda County *** 132.2 (129.7, 134.7) 45 (39, 50) 2,303 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Orange County *** 131.4 (129.7, 133.2) 46 (40, 51) 4,643 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
San Francisco County *** 131.0 (127.8, 134.2) 47 (39, 51) 1,380 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Santa Cruz County *** 129.7 (123.9, 135.7) 48 (35, 53) 405 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Monterey County *** 128.1 (123.3, 133.0) 49 (41, 54) 568 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Trinity County *** 126.6 (105.9, 151.3) 50 (10, 56) 30 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
San Benito County *** 125.0 (112.3, 138.7) 51 (26, 56) 74 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Imperial County *** 124.6 (117.3, 132.3) 52 (40, 56) 220 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
San Mateo County *** 120.7 (117.5, 124.0) 53 (49, 56) 1,136 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.3)
Santa Clara County *** 120.5 (118.3, 122.6) 54 (49, 56) 2,433 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Marin County *** 116.2 (111.4, 121.1) 55 (50, 56) 475 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Sierra County *** 98.3 (66.2, 149.1) 56 (12, 57) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Mono County *** 75.3 (56.3, 98.7) 57 (56, 57) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/19/2021 10:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top