Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California No 135.1 (134.6, 135.6) N/A 59,656 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.7, -1.6)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Alpine County No 235.3 (137.9, 389.3) 1 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Yuba County No 184.9 (171.1, 199.5) 2 (1, 8) 141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Lake County No 179.9 (167.9, 192.6) 3 (1, 9) 185 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Del Norte County No 170.7 (152.0, 191.3) 4 (1, 27) 64 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Siskiyou County No 170.5 (156.9, 185.3) 5 (1, 20) 129 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Humboldt County No 168.3 (159.5, 177.4) 6 (2, 14) 297 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Butte County No 166.7 (160.0, 173.7) 7 (2, 13) 493 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Shasta County No 166.0 (159.0, 173.3) 8 (3, 14) 445 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Tehama County No 162.5 (150.8, 175.0) 9 (2, 25) 151 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Stanislaus County No 158.8 (154.1, 163.6) 10 (6, 17) 888 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Solano County No 158.1 (153.3, 163.1) 11 (6, 20) 841 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Glenn County No 155.3 (137.0, 175.5) 12 (2, 46) 53 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Merced County No 154.3 (147.3, 161.5) 13 (7, 27) 377 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Sutter County No 152.5 (142.5, 163.1) 14 (5, 34) 176 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
San Joaquin County No 150.8 (146.9, 154.8) 15 (11, 26) 1,141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Sacramento County No 150.7 (148.1, 153.4) 16 (12, 25) 2,553 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
San Bernardino County No 150.7 (148.2, 153.1) 17 (12, 25) 3,030 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
Tuolumne County No 150.4 (139.2, 162.4) 18 (5, 38) 148 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Plumas County No 149.1 (130.3, 170.6) 19 (2, 51) 53 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Kern County No 148.8 (145.0, 152.8) 20 (12, 28) 1,170 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Mendocino County No 147.4 (137.9, 157.4) 21 (8, 38) 196 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Inyo County No 146.2 (126.2, 168.9) 22 (3, 52) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Madera County No 145.2 (137.0, 153.9) 23 (11, 39) 238 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Mariposa County No 145.2 (125.2, 168.2) 24 (3, 53) 46 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Lassen County No 145.1 (127.2, 165.0) 25 (4, 53) 49 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Kings County No 144.4 (135.1, 154.2) 26 (11, 42) 184 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Amador County No 143.5 (131.2, 157.0) 27 (8, 48) 107 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Tulare County No 142.8 (137.7, 148.1) 28 (16, 37) 598 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Calaveras County No 141.9 (130.2, 154.6) 29 (10, 49) 123 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Napa County No 141.4 (134.0, 149.2) 30 (14, 42) 282 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Fresno County No 139.5 (136.1, 142.9) 31 (22, 38) 1,336 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Riverside County No 138.2 (136.3, 140.3) 32 (25, 38) 3,767 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Sonoma County No 137.5 (133.5, 141.5) 33 (24, 41) 978 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Yolo County No 137.3 (130.1, 144.6) 34 (19, 46) 289 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
San Diego County No 137.2 (135.5, 139.0) 35 (27, 38) 5,040 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
Nevada County No 135.4 (127.5, 143.9) 36 (21, 49) 247 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
San Luis Obispo County No 134.1 (129.0, 139.4) 37 (26, 46) 548 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Los Angeles County No 133.3 (132.4, 134.3) 38 (33, 42) 14,616 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Colusa County No 132.5 (112.3, 155.3) 39 (6, 57) 32 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Ventura County No 130.7 (127.6, 133.9) 40 (34, 47) 1,337 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Contra Costa County No 130.5 (127.8, 133.2) 41 (34, 47) 1,832 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
Placer County No 130.2 (126.0, 134.6) 42 (33, 49) 745 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Santa Barbara County No 130.0 (125.6, 134.5) 43 (33, 49) 687 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
El Dorado County No 127.5 (121.6, 133.7) 44 (33, 53) 371 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Orange County No 127.1 (125.5, 128.8) 45 (40, 49) 4,707 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Alameda County No 125.0 (122.6, 127.3) 46 (42, 52) 2,278 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.4, -2.1)
Santa Cruz County No 124.8 (119.3, 130.6) 47 (37, 54) 410 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Imperial County Yes 122.4 (115.2, 129.9) 48 (37, 56) 223 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
San Francisco County Yes 121.6 (118.7, 124.7) 49 (44, 54) 1,328 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.8, -1.0)
Monterey County Yes 121.6 (117.1, 126.3) 50 (42, 54) 559 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Modoc County Yes 121.6 (97.3, 151.5) 51 (7, 57) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
San Benito County Yes 120.3 (108.2, 133.3) 52 (30, 57) 76 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Trinity County Yes 116.3 (96.8, 139.7) 53 (20, 57) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
San Mateo County Yes 114.0 (111.0, 117.1) 54 (50, 57) 1,110 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.4)
Santa Clara County Yes 113.5 (111.5, 115.6) 55 (51, 57) 2,388 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Marin County Yes 111.7 (107.2, 116.4) 56 (51, 57) 480 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Sierra County Yes 98.1 (66.1, 148.6) 57 (14, 58) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Mono County Yes 57.1 (42.3, 75.8) 58 (57, 58) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 8:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top