Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 132.7 (132.2, 133.2) N/A 59,840 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Alameda County Urban Yes 119.7 (117.5, 121.9) 49 (44, 52) 2,259 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -2.1)
Alpine County Rural No 187.9 (108.9, 316.4) 1 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Amador County Rural No 138.7 (126.9, 151.6) 29 (10, 49) 108 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Butte County Urban No 171.1 (164.1, 178.3) 5 (1, 10) 478 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Calaveras County Rural No 143.5 (131.6, 156.4) 23 (8, 45) 125 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Colusa County Rural No 126.1 (106.8, 147.9) 46 (10, 57) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Contra Costa County Urban No 126.4 (123.7, 129.0) 45 (35, 49) 1,823 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.8)
Del Norte County Rural No 177.2 (158.3, 198.0) 2 (1, 16) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
El Dorado County Urban No 124.4 (118.7, 130.5) 48 (33, 52) 373 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Fresno County Urban No 138.2 (134.9, 141.6) 30 (21, 36) 1,353 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Glenn County Rural No 168.5 (149.6, 189.3) 7 (1, 28) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Humboldt County Rural No 171.8 (163.0, 180.9) 4 (1, 10) 311 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Imperial County Urban Yes 114.3 (107.4, 121.5) 53 (44, 57) 210 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Inyo County Rural No 128.8 (110.8, 149.4) 41 (10, 57) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Kern County Urban No 145.5 (141.7, 149.4) 18 (12, 29) 1,176 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Kings County Urban No 144.1 (134.9, 153.8) 21 (9, 38) 187 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Lake County Rural No 169.7 (158.5, 181.6) 6 (1, 13) 187 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Lassen County Rural No 143.4 (126.1, 162.4) 24 (5, 51) 52 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Los Angeles County Urban No 130.3 (129.4, 131.3) 36 (32, 43) 14,510 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Madera County Urban No 140.1 (132.0, 148.6) 27 (12, 42) 229 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Marin County Urban Yes 111.1 (106.6, 115.7) 55 (49, 57) 492 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Mariposa County Rural No 130.6 (112.4, 151.6) 35 (9, 56) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Mendocino County Rural No 144.5 (135.4, 154.1) 20 (9, 38) 207 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Merced County Urban No 145.3 (138.6, 152.2) 19 (10, 33) 367 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Modoc County Rural No 134.2 (109.1, 164.9) 32 (2, 57) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Mono County Rural Yes 48.9 (35.3, 66.6) 58 (58, 58) 9 falling falling trend -15.2 (-44.7, -4.1)
Monterey County Urban Yes 119.2 (114.8, 123.7) 50 (42, 54) 566 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Napa County Urban No 132.2 (125.1, 139.7) 34 (21, 48) 271 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Nevada County Rural No 126.6 (119.0, 134.6) 43 (27, 52) 243 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Orange County Urban No 125.0 (123.4, 126.6) 47 (38, 49) 4,741 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Placer County Urban No 129.5 (125.4, 133.7) 39 (31, 48) 777 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Plumas County Rural No 130.3 (113.7, 149.4) 37 (10, 56) 51 falling falling trend -2.7 (-6.7, -2.0)
Riverside County Urban No 140.6 (138.6, 142.6) 26 (20, 32) 3,870 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Sacramento County Urban No 146.2 (143.6, 148.8) 16 (12, 26) 2,583 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -1.3)
San Benito County Urban No 130.1 (117.8, 143.4) 38 (14, 55) 85 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
San Bernardino County Urban No 149.3 (146.9, 151.7) 14 (11, 22) 3,056 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.3)
San Diego County Urban No 136.5 (134.8, 138.2) 31 (25, 37) 5,064 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -1.4)
San Francisco County Urban Yes 116.3 (113.4, 119.2) 51 (46, 54) 1,290 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -2.1)
San Joaquin County Urban No 146.1 (142.3, 150.0) 17 (12, 27) 1,155 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -1.4)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 133.1 (127.9, 138.3) 33 (24, 45) 551 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
San Mateo County Urban Yes 111.4 (108.4, 114.4) 54 (50, 56) 1,101 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.8, -2.3)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 126.5 (122.2, 130.9) 44 (33, 50) 683 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Santa Clara County Urban Yes 109.9 (107.9, 112.0) 56 (51, 57) 2,372 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.2)
Santa Cruz County Urban No 126.9 (121.4, 132.5) 42 (31, 51) 427 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Shasta County Urban No 162.4 (155.5, 169.6) 10 (3, 13) 443 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Sierra County Rural Yes 114.9 (81.2, 165.1) 52 (3, 57) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Siskiyou County Rural No 165.5 (151.9, 180.2) 8 (1, 22) 126 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Solano County Urban No 150.8 (146.2, 155.6) 12 (9, 23) 829 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Sonoma County Urban No 139.6 (135.7, 143.7) 28 (18, 35) 995 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Stanislaus County Urban No 156.9 (152.3, 161.6) 11 (7, 15) 891 falling falling trend -1.0 (-3.1, -0.5)
Sutter County Urban No 143.8 (134.3, 153.9) 22 (9, 39) 173 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Tehama County Rural No 173.3 (161.2, 186.1) 3 (1, 12) 162 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 8.3)
Trinity County Rural Yes 92.4 (77.1, 110.7) 57 (49, 57) 30 falling falling trend -7.2 (-21.9, -3.7)
Tulare County Urban No 150.2 (144.9, 155.5) 13 (9, 26) 639 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.7)
Tuolumne County Rural No 146.2 (135.3, 157.9) 15 (8, 39) 149 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.9, -1.3)
Ventura County Urban No 128.9 (125.8, 132.0) 40 (32, 47) 1,347 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Yolo County Urban No 142.4 (135.2, 149.8) 25 (11, 36) 304 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Yuba County Urban No 165.5 (152.8, 178.9) 9 (1, 18) 134 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 9:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top