Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 444.4 (442.8, 446.1) N/A 56,394 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Alpine County Rural No 680.0 (394.0, 1,094.8) 1 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Del Norte County Rural No 607.0 (541.4, 678.4) 2 (1, 13) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Glenn County Rural No 596.9 (529.6, 670.5) 3 (1, 17) 58 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Humboldt County Rural No 589.0 (558.8, 620.5) 4 (1, 10) 301 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Butte County Urban No 577.2 (553.4, 601.7) 5 (1, 10) 459 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Tehama County Rural No 571.4 (531.3, 613.6) 6 (1, 14) 154 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Lake County Rural No 568.9 (531.6, 608.2) 7 (1, 13) 181 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Yuba County Urban No 562.3 (518.1, 609.2) 8 (1, 18) 127 falling falling trend -1.8 (-7.0, -1.0)
Shasta County Urban No 543.2 (520.1, 567.1) 9 (3, 14) 426 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.1, -1.1)
Siskiyou County Rural No 541.3 (497.7, 587.8) 10 (2, 25) 121 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Stanislaus County Urban No 522.4 (506.5, 538.8) 11 (7, 17) 833 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.5, -0.6)
Solano County Urban No 508.4 (492.4, 524.8) 12 (9, 22) 791 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Tulare County Urban No 502.0 (483.8, 520.7) 13 (9, 26) 593 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.7)
San Bernardino County Urban No 498.3 (490.0, 506.8) 14 (11, 23) 2,835 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Tuolumne County Rural No 496.6 (460.2, 535.2) 15 (7, 36) 145 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
San Joaquin County Urban No 490.5 (477.4, 504.0) 16 (12, 28) 1,084 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -1.2)
Sacramento County Urban No 488.6 (479.8, 497.5) 17 (13, 27) 2,427 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -1.3)
Amador County Rural No 486.3 (445.1, 530.5) 18 (8, 43) 107 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Merced County Urban No 485.6 (462.5, 509.5) 19 (11, 34) 341 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Lassen County Rural No 485.4 (425.3, 551.4) 20 (4, 50) 49 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Kern County Urban No 485.3 (472.2, 498.6) 21 (13, 30) 1,088 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -1.4)
Yolo County Urban No 483.5 (458.5, 509.4) 22 (10, 36) 289 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Sutter County Urban No 480.4 (447.9, 514.8) 23 (10, 39) 164 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Mendocino County Rural No 478.4 (448.2, 510.1) 24 (10, 41) 199 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Kings County Urban No 476.1 (444.1, 509.8) 25 (10, 42) 169 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Sonoma County Urban No 471.8 (458.3, 485.6) 26 (17, 35) 957 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 2.4)
Riverside County Urban No 470.6 (463.8, 477.5) 27 (20, 33) 3,647 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Calaveras County Rural No 467.6 (430.1, 507.6) 28 (10, 47) 120 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Fresno County Urban No 463.6 (452.1, 475.3) 29 (21, 37) 1,267 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Madera County Urban No 461.9 (434.2, 491.0) 30 (13, 45) 213 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
San Diego County Urban No 460.7 (454.8, 466.7) 31 (25, 36) 4,797 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -1.4)
Modoc County Rural No 458.8 (375.2, 556.1) 32 (3, 57) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Plumas County Rural No 454.4 (397.3, 517.7) 33 (9, 55) 51 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 445.1 (428.0, 462.7) 34 (25, 45) 531 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
San Benito County Urban No 441.1 (398.1, 487.3) 35 (13, 54) 80 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Napa County Urban No 440.6 (416.8, 465.5) 36 (23, 49) 259 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Placer County Urban No 437.8 (423.8, 452.2) 37 (30, 46) 747 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Los Angeles County Urban No 433.1 (429.8, 436.4) 38 (33, 44) 13,543 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.5)
Ventura County Urban No 432.8 (422.2, 443.7) 39 (32, 47) 1,281 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Colusa County Rural No 430.6 (363.8, 506.0) 40 (10, 57) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Santa Cruz County Urban No 425.7 (406.9, 445.0) 41 (31, 51) 407 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Mariposa County Rural No 425.6 (369.0, 488.6) 42 (12, 56) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Contra Costa County Urban No 423.2 (414.3, 432.4) 43 (36, 49) 1,726 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.9)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 421.0 (406.5, 436.0) 44 (34, 50) 648 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
El Dorado County Urban No 419.6 (400.1, 439.9) 45 (33, 52) 361 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Inyo County Rural No 419.0 (361.0, 483.9) 46 (12, 57) 39 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Orange County Urban No 419.0 (413.5, 424.6) 47 (39, 49) 4,482 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -1.5)
Nevada County Rural No 415.8 (391.5, 441.1) 48 (32, 53) 234 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Sierra County Rural No 415.6 (293.7, 572.9) 49 (2, 57) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Alameda County Urban No 405.4 (397.6, 413.3) 50 (44, 52) 2,138 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
San Francisco County Urban No 393.5 (383.6, 403.7) 51 (46, 54) 1,229 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.7, -2.1)
Monterey County Urban No 393.3 (378.2, 408.9) 52 (44, 55) 527 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Imperial County Urban No 378.1 (354.6, 402.8) 53 (46, 57) 196 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Marin County Urban No 376.1 (361.1, 391.7) 54 (49, 57) 477 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
San Mateo County Urban No 375.4 (365.2, 385.8) 55 (50, 57) 1,047 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.8, -2.3)
Santa Clara County Urban No 370.8 (363.9, 377.8) 56 (51, 57) 2,239 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.9)
Trinity County Rural No 313.7 (263.2, 371.4) 57 (49, 57) 29 falling falling trend -7.4 (-23.9, -3.7)
Mono County Rural No 166.0 (119.1, 225.7) 58 (58, 58) 9 falling falling trend -14.7 (-42.7, -4.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2024 3:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top