Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
California *** 820.5 (816.9, 824.0) N/A 42,410 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States *** 888.4 (887.2, 889.6) N/A 423,040 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Stanislaus County *** 942.4 (909.0, 976.7) 10 (4, 21) 613 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Yuba County *** 1,096.9 (997.5, 1,203.6) 1 (1, 12) 93 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Kings County *** 889.9 (821.0, 963.0) 18 (4, 44) 125 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
San Joaquin County *** 922.3 (893.3, 951.9) 14 (6, 23) 789 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Shasta County *** 1,016.0 (968.3, 1,065.3) 3 (1, 11) 348 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Butte County *** 955.6 (912.0, 1,000.6) 6 (2, 22) 374 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Glenn County *** 1,084.6 (946.3, 1,237.4) 2 (1, 23) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Merced County *** 926.2 (876.0, 978.5) 13 (4, 28) 260 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Siskiyou County *** 926.5 (841.9, 1,017.2) 12 (2, 39) 91 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Solano County *** 948.5 (913.6, 984.3) 7 (3, 20) 576 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Lake County *** 1,015.7 (939.0, 1,097.0) 4 (1, 19) 134 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Tulare County *** 803.0 (767.3, 840.0) 39 (24, 50) 388 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Tuolumne County *** 932.4 (857.4, 1,012.1) 11 (2, 35) 116 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Calaveras County *** 889.7 (810.7, 974.3) 19 (3, 46) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Fresno County *** 808.2 (784.4, 832.5) 38 (26, 47) 898 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Madera County *** 837.9 (780.6, 898.1) 29 (11, 49) 163 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Santa Barbara County *** 778.1 (747.8, 809.4) 45 (32, 52) 512 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Sutter County *** 888.1 (819.8, 960.5) 20 (4, 43) 126 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Tehama County *** 968.8 (889.0, 1,053.9) 5 (1, 27) 110 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Ventura County *** 825.7 (802.6, 849.3) 33 (23, 42) 991 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Amador County *** 866.9 (782.5, 957.8) 23 (4, 51) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Del Norte County *** 947.0 (821.2, 1,086.5) 8 (1, 49) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
San Luis Obispo County *** 800.8 (766.0, 836.8) 40 (24, 50) 409 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
El Dorado County *** 831.0 (787.4, 876.4) 31 (17, 47) 281 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Inyo County *** 839.7 (717.0, 977.4) 28 (3, 56) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Los Angeles County *** 794.1 (787.1, 801.1) 41 (34, 46) 10,152 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Modoc County *** 813.0 (648.8, 1,005.7) 36 (2, 56) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Colusa County *** 810.2 (668.8, 972.6) 37 (2, 56) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Mendocino County *** 851.1 (787.2, 918.8) 25 (7, 48) 140 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Orange County *** 783.6 (771.8, 795.6) 43 (36, 49) 3,394 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Santa Cruz County *** 772.3 (731.9, 814.3) 47 (29, 54) 291 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Mariposa County *** 753.1 (641.0, 879.0) 48 (9, 56) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Placer County *** 849.5 (818.8, 881.0) 26 (17, 39) 587 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
San Bernardino County *** 907.3 (889.3, 925.6) 15 (9, 23) 1,990 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
San Francisco County *** 776.5 (755.0, 798.4) 46 (35, 51) 1,033 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Sierra County *** 561.3 (350.2, 852.1) 56 (6, 57) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Humboldt County *** 946.8 (887.3, 1,009.2) 9 (2, 27) 199 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Lassen County *** 817.5 (694.5, 955.7) 35 (3, 56) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Napa County *** 886.2 (834.3, 940.5) 21 (6, 38) 223 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Plumas County *** 899.4 (778.3, 1,033.8) 17 (1, 54) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Riverside County *** 832.3 (818.2, 846.7) 30 (23, 38) 2,658 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Yolo County *** 828.8 (777.9, 882.1) 32 (15, 49) 204 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Kern County *** 883.0 (854.9, 911.8) 22 (12, 29) 764 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Monterey County *** 734.6 (702.1, 768.2) 51 (41, 56) 400 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Nevada County *** 793.1 (741.8, 847.0) 42 (21, 54) 185 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Marin County *** 734.4 (701.4, 768.6) 52 (41, 56) 386 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
San Diego County *** 842.1 (829.7, 854.6) 27 (22, 35) 3,627 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Trinity County *** 738.0 (605.5, 890.8) 49 (6, 56) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Sacramento County *** 905.9 (886.8, 925.3) 16 (9, 24) 1,767 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Alameda County *** 779.6 (762.5, 797.1) 44 (35, 50) 1,625 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Contra Costa County *** 822.1 (802.3, 842.3) 34 (24, 42) 1,347 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Imperial County *** 692.7 (644.0, 744.2) 55 (46, 56) 152 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
San Benito County *** 724.3 (635.7, 821.8) 53 (21, 56) 50 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
San Mateo County *** 737.8 (715.6, 760.4) 50 (44, 55) 869 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Santa Clara County *** 718.9 (703.8, 734.3) 54 (47, 56) 1,759 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Sonoma County *** 854.9 (826.8, 883.8) 24 (16, 37) 733 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Mono County *** 403.3 (276.9, 566.8) 57 (55, 57) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.4)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/15/2021 12:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alpine

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top