Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California Yes 113.7 (112.8, 114.7) N/A 11,534 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States 6 Yes 108.2 (107.8, 108.7) N/A 41,779 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Colusa County Yes 69.3 (45.3, 100.7) 47 (17, 47) 6
*
*
Sutter County Yes 70.1 (53.7, 89.6) 46 (35, 47) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.1)
Mendocino County Yes 74.1 (52.7, 100.4) 45 (21, 47) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.0)
Calaveras County Yes 80.8 (51.4, 121.3) 44 (2, 47) 5
*
*
Marin County Yes 83.6 (67.5, 102.2) 43 (20, 47) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Lake County Yes 86.5 (61.0, 118.4) 42 (2, 47) 8 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.4, -2.4)
San Mateo County Yes 93.1 (85.8, 100.7) 41 (28, 44) 128 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Tuolumne County Yes 94.2 (62.1, 136.5) 40 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Yuba County Yes 96.6 (71.5, 126.8) 39 (1, 47) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Shasta County Yes 96.7 (72.2, 126.2) 38 (1, 47) 11
*
*
Placer County Yes 96.8 (83.8, 111.3) 37 (10, 45) 41 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Santa Cruz County Yes 97.3 (85.3, 110.4) 36 (12, 44) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
El Dorado County Yes 98.0 (77.6, 121.7) 35 (2, 47) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Tehama County Yes 98.1 (70.8, 131.4) 34 (1, 47) 9
*
*
San Francisco County Yes 100.0 (91.7, 108.8) 33 (18, 42) 112 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
San Benito County Yes 100.0 (83.0, 119.4) 32 (2, 45) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Monterey County Yes 104.4 (96.5, 112.8) 31 (12, 40) 148 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Merced County Yes 104.8 (95.5, 114.7) 30 (8, 40) 103 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Ventura County Yes 105.0 (99.2, 111.1) 29 (16, 38) 258 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Contra Costa County Yes 105.6 (98.8, 112.8) 28 (12, 39) 193 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Napa County Yes 106.1 (89.1, 125.1) 27 (1, 44) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
San Luis Obispo County Yes 106.9 (92.6, 122.7) 26 (2, 43) 43 rising rising trend 7.3 (2.2, 12.6)
Alameda County Yes 107.5 (101.3, 113.9) 25 (11, 37) 250 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Nevada County Yes 107.9 (74.0, 150.7) 24 (1, 47) 7
*
*
Amador County Yes 108.6 (65.8, 166.7) 23 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Santa Clara County Yes 109.4 (104.2, 114.8) 22 (10, 34) 354 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Sonoma County Yes 111.0 (100.0, 122.8) 21 (2, 38) 85 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Riverside County Yes 112.8 (109.2, 116.5) 20 (9, 28) 834 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Tulare County Yes 113.4 (106.1, 121.1) 19 (3, 33) 196 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Los Angeles County Yes 114.3 (112.7, 116.0) 18 (9, 24) 4,080 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
Orange County Yes 114.4 (110.6, 118.3) 17 (7, 26) 762 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Santa Barbara County Yes 114.6 (105.9, 123.7) 16 (2, 34) 141 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Imperial County Yes 114.8 (106.8, 123.2) 15 (2, 32) 157 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Sacramento County Yes 115.3 (108.6, 122.3) 14 (2, 30) 244 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Kings County Yes 115.6 (101.8, 130.5) 13 (1, 37) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Butte County Yes 116.0 (95.6, 139.0) 12 (1, 43) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Glenn County Yes 116.0 (81.3, 159.3) 11 (1, 47) 8
*
*
Madera County Yes 116.3 (103.1, 130.7) 10 (1, 37) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Kern County Yes 116.3 (110.0, 122.9) 9 (3, 28) 296 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Fresno County Yes 118.5 (113.1, 124.2) 8 (2, 23) 388 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Solano County Yes 119.0 (107.7, 131.1) 7 (1, 33) 88 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Stanislaus County Yes 120.6 (112.4, 129.2) 6 (1, 26) 180 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
San Diego County Yes 120.7 (117.0, 124.5) 5 (2, 17) 877 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
San Bernardino County No 123.2 (119.4, 127.2) 4 (1, 13) 877 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
Yolo County No 125.3 (110.1, 141.9) 3 (1, 32) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
San Joaquin County No 125.3 (117.8, 133.2) 2 (1, 18) 225 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Humboldt County No 130.6 (94.0, 175.3) 1 (1, 44) 10
*
*
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/29/2024 10:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top