Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

White Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California *** 121.0 (120.0, 122.1) N/A 11,080 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
United States 6 *** 116.2 (115.6, 116.7) N/A 39,492 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Humboldt County *** 149.1 (104.8, 203.9) 1 (1, 44) 9
*
*
San Joaquin County *** 136.0 (127.6, 144.8) 2 (1, 17) 215 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Butte County *** 134.5 (110.9, 161.1) 3 (1, 39) 25 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.3)
Stanislaus County *** 131.6 (122.5, 141.2) 4 (1, 25) 172 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.0)
Yolo County *** 131.0 (114.4, 149.2) 5 (1, 36) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
San Bernardino County *** 130.8 (126.6, 135.1) 6 (2, 16) 835 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Kings County *** 130.8 (115.2, 147.6) 7 (1, 35) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Sacramento County *** 130.2 (122.4, 138.2) 8 (1, 24) 232 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Amador County *** 128.6 (78.4, 196.6) 9 (1, 47) 5
*
*
San Diego County *** 127.3 (123.3, 131.3) 10 (4, 19) 837 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Madera County *** 126.4 (111.8, 142.3) 11 (1, 37) 61 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Yuba County *** 126.1 (94.4, 163.9) 12 (1, 45) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Kern County *** 124.8 (117.8, 132.0) 13 (3, 30) 283 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Fresno County *** 124.2 (118.4, 130.3) 14 (4, 28) 367 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Solano County *** 121.8 (109.4, 135.2) 15 (2, 38) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Santa Barbara County *** 120.6 (111.3, 130.4) 16 (4, 36) 136 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Los Angeles County *** 120.6 (118.9, 122.4) 17 (12, 27) 3,952 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.7, -0.5)
Orange County *** 120.5 (116.4, 124.6) 18 (9, 30) 737 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
Riverside County *** 120.2 (116.3, 124.2) 19 (9, 31) 796 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Tulare County *** 119.5 (111.6, 127.8) 20 (6, 36) 190 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Alameda County *** 118.9 (112.0, 126.1) 21 (8, 35) 241 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.5)
Imperial County *** 118.7 (110.3, 127.5) 22 (6, 37) 152 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Santa Clara County *** 117.7 (112.0, 123.6) 23 (10, 35) 342 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Sonoma County *** 116.3 (104.4, 129.2) 24 (4, 40) 79 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Glenn County *** 116.1 (79.6, 162.2) 25 (1, 47) 7
*
*
San Francisco County *** 115.8 (106.2, 126.0) 26 (7, 39) 111 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Santa Cruz County *** 115.2 (101.2, 130.4) 27 (3, 42) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Contra Costa County *** 114.7 (107.0, 122.7) 28 (10, 38) 183 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Monterey County *** 114.3 (105.5, 123.6) 29 (9, 39) 143 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
San Benito County *** 114.0 (94.5, 136.0) 30 (2, 44) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Ventura County *** 111.5 (105.2, 118.0) 31 (17, 39) 250 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Lake County *** 111.5 (79.3, 151.5) 32 (1, 47) 9 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.8)
Merced County *** 111.1 (100.9, 122.0) 33 (10, 42) 96 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
El Dorado County *** 109.3 (86.1, 136.4) 34 (1, 46) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Tehama County *** 105.9 (75.1, 143.9) 35 (1, 47) 8
*
*
San Luis Obispo County *** 105.3 (90.4, 121.7) 36 (9, 45) 39 rising rising trend 7.5 (0.6, 14.8)
Napa County *** 104.7 (87.1, 124.4) 37 (6, 46) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Tuolumne County *** 104.2 (67.5, 153.0) 38 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Placer County *** 99.3 (85.2, 114.8) 39 (15, 46) 37 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
San Mateo County *** 98.9 (91.0, 107.3) 40 (30, 45) 122 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Nevada County *** 98.4 (64.0, 143.3) 41 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Shasta County *** 96.4 (70.3, 128.4) 42 (2, 47) 10
*
*
Colusa County *** 88.5 (59.9, 124.9) 43 (3, 47) 7
*
*
Sutter County *** 88.4 (68.6, 111.6) 44 (17, 47) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.5)
Mendocino County *** 83.3 (59.2, 113.1) 45 (10, 47) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.5)
Marin County *** 78.6 (62.2, 97.5) 46 (33, 47) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Calaveras County *** 74.9 (44.2, 119.0) 47 (6, 47) 4
*
*
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/22/2021 10:06 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2019) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top