Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California No 175.7 (173.4, 178.1) N/A 4,405 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.1, -1.8)
United States No 174.7 (174.1, 175.3) N/A 70,283 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.1, -2.0)
Shasta County No 198.3 (114.8, 314.0) 7 (1, 36) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
Sutter County No 152.0 (90.1, 239.7) 26 (1, 36) 4
*
*
San Luis Obispo County Yes 90.4 (52.7, 143.7) 36 (23, 36) 4 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.9, -2.5)
Imperial County No 153.5 (95.5, 233.0) 25 (1, 36) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.0)
Yuba County No 220.1 (133.2, 336.3) 3 (1, 35) 5 stable stable trend -26.8 (-55.6, 20.8)
Santa Cruz County No 165.3 (101.8, 251.8) 19 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Lake County No 243.7 (152.2, 372.3) 1 (1, 34) 5
*
*
Butte County No 149.8 (97.0, 219.3) 28 (2, 36) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Napa County No 157.3 (101.3, 233.2) 24 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Tulare County No 129.4 (89.7, 180.0) 34 (7, 36) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Madera County No 162.3 (115.1, 222.3) 22 (1, 36) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Yolo County No 166.9 (118.6, 227.4) 17 (1, 36) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Kings County No 162.5 (114.6, 221.6) 21 (2, 36) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.8)
Sonoma County Yes 112.6 (81.4, 151.1) 35 (19, 36) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Placer County No 137.8 (101.4, 182.6) 32 (6, 36) 10
*
*
Marin County No 166.1 (123.4, 218.4) 18 (2, 35) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Santa Barbara County No 151.7 (116.8, 193.6) 27 (4, 35) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Monterey County No 132.7 (105.3, 165.1) 33 (15, 36) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.1)
Merced County No 235.9 (193.3, 285.0) 2 (1, 17) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Ventura County No 167.5 (140.7, 198.0) 16 (4, 32) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Stanislaus County No 208.3 (175.3, 245.5) 4 (1, 23) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
San Mateo County No 147.8 (128.2, 169.9) 29 (14, 34) 42 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Santa Clara County No 143.1 (127.6, 160.0) 30 (18, 34) 66 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Kern County No 183.4 (163.8, 204.6) 11 (3, 25) 71 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Orange County No 142.2 (127.3, 158.3) 31 (19, 35) 74 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Fresno County No 199.6 (180.5, 220.2) 5 (2, 19) 85 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
San Joaquin County No 185.7 (169.1, 203.4) 10 (3, 23) 103 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
San Francisco County No 199.5 (184.0, 216.1) 6 (2, 17) 127 stable stable trend -7.6 (-15.1, 0.5)
Solano County No 188.7 (174.4, 203.9) 8 (3, 20) 139 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Contra Costa County No 181.7 (170.4, 193.5) 12 (5, 22) 207 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
San Diego County No 159.3 (149.9, 169.1) 23 (15, 29) 234 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Riverside County No 164.2 (155.1, 173.6) 20 (14, 27) 264 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Sacramento County No 186.4 (176.5, 196.8) 9 (4, 20) 280 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
San Bernardino County No 172.7 (163.6, 182.1) 15 (9, 24) 295 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Alameda County No 178.2 (170.2, 186.6) 14 (7, 22) 387 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Los Angeles County No 180.6 (176.8, 184.4) 13 (8, 20) 1,795 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
El Dorado County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/13/2024 2:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top