Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

American Indian/Alaska Native Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 138.2 (131.5, 145.2) N/A 339 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.3)
United States 6 N/A No 127.4 (125.5, 129.4) N/A 3,452 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Santa Barbara County Urban Yes 115.4 (62.4, 197.8) 24 (3, 31) 3
*
*
Del Norte County Rural No 152.2 (87.0, 246.7) 15 (1, 31) 3
*
*
San Francisco County Urban No 145.0 (83.1, 236.4) 16 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Placer County Urban Yes 95.1 (55.0, 156.8) 31 (10, 31) 4
*
*
San Luis Obispo County Urban Yes 121.9 (70.5, 209.3) 21 (3, 31) 4
*
*
Lake County Rural No 173.3 (101.3, 276.5) 8 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Yolo County Urban No 265.9 (158.5, 420.6) 1 (1, 26) 4
*
*
Solano County Urban No 144.6 (86.1, 228.9) 17 (2, 31) 4
*
*
Inyo County Rural No 162.6 (100.6, 251.5) 10 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Ventura County Urban Yes 112.4 (68.2, 175.9) 27 (6, 31) 4
*
*
Tulare County Urban Yes 117.4 (74.4, 176.6) 23 (6, 31) 5
*
*
Madera County Urban No 190.6 (120.4, 291.6) 6 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Siskiyou County Rural No 225.8 (145.6, 335.4) 2 (1, 25) 5
*
*
Butte County Urban No 135.9 (89.5, 198.2) 19 (3, 31) 6
*
*
San Joaquin County Urban Yes 112.6 (73.0, 167.0) 26 (7, 31) 6
*
*
Sonoma County Urban Yes 115.0 (75.8, 168.2) 25 (8, 31) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.9, 0.0)
Alameda County Urban Yes 106.9 (73.1, 151.4) 29 (11, 31) 7 falling falling trend -5.6 (-27.3, -0.3)
Santa Clara County Urban No 128.1 (88.4, 179.4) 20 (5, 31) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.9)
Shasta County Urban No 155.5 (107.1, 218.0) 13 (2, 30) 7 falling falling trend -22.5 (-44.0, -3.6)
Contra Costa County Urban No 160.2 (113.1, 221.0) 11 (2, 29) 8
*
*
Mendocino County Rural No 196.3 (140.2, 267.6) 5 (1, 24) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.5)
Fresno County Urban Yes 105.2 (75.5, 143.2) 30 (13, 31) 9
*
*
Stanislaus County Urban No 198.1 (140.9, 272.2) 4 (1, 24) 9
*
*
Orange County Urban Yes 120.3 (92.6, 154.4) 22 (10, 31) 13 stable stable trend -2.7 (-18.8, 1.6)
Kern County Urban No 157.2 (121.4, 201.3) 12 (3, 27) 14
*
*
Humboldt County Rural No 221.6 (175.5, 276.0) 3 (1, 14) 17 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 3.1)
San Bernardino County Urban No 152.3 (122.5, 187.5) 14 (4, 26) 20 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 3.3)
Sacramento County Urban No 184.0 (149.1, 224.8) 7 (2, 20) 21 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 4.0)
San Diego County Urban No 142.9 (118.0, 171.6) 18 (7, 27) 25 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.4, -0.5)
Riverside County Urban No 168.1 (140.0, 200.3) 9 (3, 21) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-7.0, 2.2)
Los Angeles County Urban Yes 108.2 (93.0, 125.4) 28 (18, 31) 38 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.8)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
El Dorado County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Imperial County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kings County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Merced County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monterey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Napa County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Mateo County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Santa Cruz County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutter County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuba County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 4:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top