Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A Yes 116.5 (115.9, 117.1) N/A 28,753 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Mono County Rural Yes 43.1 (25.4, 70.1) 57 (56, 57) 4
*
*
Trinity County Rural Yes 77.5 (57.5, 104.5) 56 (39, 57) 12 falling falling trend -4.4 (-13.5, -3.2)
Modoc County Rural Yes 96.4 (70.1, 134.3) 55 (6, 56) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.2)
Santa Clara County Urban Yes 96.8 (94.3, 99.4) 54 (47, 56) 1,138 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.9)
San Mateo County Urban Yes 97.0 (93.3, 100.9) 53 (46, 56) 533 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -2.1)
Marin County Urban Yes 98.5 (92.7, 104.6) 52 (44, 56) 239 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.0)
Imperial County Urban Yes 98.8 (90.0, 108.2) 51 (38, 56) 97 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
San Francisco County Urban Yes 99.2 (95.6, 103.0) 50 (45, 55) 594 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
El Dorado County Urban Yes 105.6 (98.3, 113.5) 49 (31, 55) 166 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Alameda County Urban Yes 107.6 (104.8, 110.5) 48 (38, 50) 1,131 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Monterey County Urban Yes 108.4 (102.6, 114.5) 47 (30, 51) 276 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Plumas County Rural Yes 108.5 (87.5, 134.6) 46 (5, 56) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Inyo County Rural Yes 109.2 (85.4, 138.6) 45 (3, 56) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Orange County Urban Yes 110.1 (108.0, 112.1) 44 (35, 48) 2,295 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
San Benito County Urban Yes 111.0 (95.8, 128.0) 43 (9, 55) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Colusa County Rural Yes 111.8 (87.1, 141.6) 42 (2, 56) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Mariposa County Rural Yes 111.9 (88.2, 141.7) 41 (3, 56) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Placer County Urban Yes 112.3 (107.0, 117.7) 40 (27, 49) 369 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Contra Costa County Urban Yes 112.5 (109.2, 115.9) 39 (29, 47) 901 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.9)
San Luis Obispo County Urban Yes 112.8 (106.2, 119.7) 38 (24, 49) 248 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Santa Cruz County Urban Yes 113.7 (106.7, 121.2) 37 (21, 49) 207 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Nevada County Rural Yes 114.1 (104.0, 125.2) 36 (14, 52) 115 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Santa Barbara County Urban Yes 114.3 (108.7, 120.2) 35 (23, 48) 334 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Los Angeles County Urban Yes 115.3 (114.1, 116.6) 34 (28, 41) 7,141 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Amador County Rural Yes 115.4 (100.3, 133.1) 33 (6, 55) 46 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Ventura County Urban Yes 115.5 (111.5, 119.6) 32 (24, 45) 659 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
San Diego County Urban Yes 117.7 (115.6, 119.9) 31 (24, 39) 2,393 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Napa County Urban Yes 118.4 (109.2, 128.4) 30 (10, 48) 130 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -1.3)
Madera County Urban Yes 119.2 (108.9, 130.1) 29 (9, 48) 102 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Mendocino County Rural Yes 119.6 (108.2, 132.0) 28 (8, 49) 91 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Sierra County Rural Yes 119.7 (73.4, 203.4) 27 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Fresno County Urban Yes 120.4 (116.2, 124.7) 26 (18, 38) 642 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Riverside County Urban No 123.1 (120.5, 125.7) 25 (16, 32) 1,808 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -1.1)
Yolo County Urban No 123.7 (114.8, 133.3) 24 (7, 43) 145 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.3, -1.3)
Solano County Urban No 124.0 (118.3, 129.9) 23 (10, 36) 376 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
San Joaquin County Urban No 124.4 (119.7, 129.3) 22 (12, 33) 540 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.9, -1.3)
Merced County Urban No 124.6 (116.3, 133.4) 21 (7, 41) 170 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Sonoma County Urban No 124.9 (119.9, 130.2) 20 (11, 33) 496 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Sacramento County Urban No 127.8 (124.6, 131.1) 19 (10, 26) 1,262 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.8)
Sutter County Urban No 127.9 (115.6, 141.3) 18 (3, 43) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Tuolumne County Rural No 128.4 (114.3, 144.2) 17 (2, 46) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Glenn County Rural No 128.9 (106.2, 155.3) 16 (1, 55) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Calaveras County Rural No 129.2 (113.0, 147.7) 15 (1, 47) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Tulare County Urban No 130.5 (123.9, 137.4) 14 (5, 29) 298 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Kern County Urban No 130.6 (125.7, 135.6) 13 (7, 25) 560 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.2)
San Bernardino County Urban No 131.5 (128.5, 134.6) 12 (7, 20) 1,475 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Kings County Urban No 132.3 (119.9, 145.6) 11 (2, 39) 85 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Siskiyou County Rural No 135.6 (118.9, 154.5) 10 (1, 42) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Shasta County Urban No 136.0 (127.3, 145.3) 9 (2, 25) 199 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Stanislaus County Urban No 136.7 (130.9, 142.7) 8 (3, 19) 426 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.7)
Lassen County Rural No 138.1 (113.1, 167.5) 7 (1, 50) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Yuba County Urban No 138.9 (123.2, 156.1) 6 (1, 37) 59 falling falling trend -9.8 (-17.9, -1.2)
Del Norte County Rural No 141.4 (118.5, 168.2) 5 (1, 48) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Butte County Urban No 146.6 (137.7, 155.9) 4 (1, 13) 222 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Humboldt County Rural No 147.4 (136.3, 159.2) 3 (1, 15) 142 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Tehama County Rural No 149.8 (134.3, 166.9) 2 (1, 21) 74 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.4, 11.1)
Lake County Rural No 154.7 (139.7, 171.2) 1 (1, 13) 87 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/10/2024 8:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top