Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

Asian or Pacific Islander (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California *** 103.4 (102.3, 104.5) N/A 7,090 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States *** 97.2 (96.5, 97.9) N/A 17,926 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Yuba County *** 165.0 (115.6, 227.2) 1 (1, 24) 8
*
*
Butte County *** 133.0 (100.8, 171.7) 2 (1, 31) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Sonoma County *** 118.9 (101.1, 139.0) 3 (1, 26) 33 stable stable trend -10.8 (-27.4, 9.8)
San Joaquin County *** 116.5 (107.9, 125.7) 4 (2, 16) 140 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Stanislaus County *** 116.1 (100.5, 133.4) 5 (1, 25) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Sacramento County *** 113.8 (108.1, 119.7) 6 (2, 15) 310 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
San Francisco County *** 111.7 (107.3, 116.2) 7 (3, 16) 523 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
San Luis Obispo County *** 110.8 (84.5, 142.7) 8 (1, 34) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Solano County *** 110.5 (101.4, 120.3) 9 (2, 21) 112 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Merced County *** 109.6 (89.4, 133.0) 10 (1, 33) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Fresno County *** 109.2 (99.7, 119.4) 11 (3, 23) 101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
San Bernardino County *** 108.8 (101.8, 116.2) 12 (3, 20) 190 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
San Diego County *** 107.5 (103.2, 112.0) 13 (5, 19) 483 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Los Angeles County *** 107.3 (105.3, 109.4) 14 (7, 18) 2,176 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Alameda County *** 101.4 (97.5, 105.3) 15 (11, 24) 539 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Orange County *** 100.5 (97.3, 103.8) 16 (12, 24) 753 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
El Dorado County *** 100.2 (71.8, 135.8) 17 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Santa Barbara County *** 99.1 (82.4, 118.3) 18 (3, 34) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Riverside County *** 96.8 (90.4, 103.6) 19 (13, 30) 176 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Monterey County *** 95.6 (83.0, 109.7) 20 (6, 34) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Contra Costa County *** 95.1 (89.3, 101.1) 21 (15, 31) 211 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Shasta County *** 94.3 (61.2, 138.6) 22 (1, 35) 5
*
*
San Mateo County *** 93.4 (88.2, 98.9) 23 (16, 32) 247 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Santa Clara County *** 93.3 (90.1, 96.7) 24 (18, 31) 641 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Napa County *** 93.2 (71.9, 119.1) 25 (2, 35) 13
*
*
Kern County *** 90.6 (78.6, 104.0) 26 (11, 35) 43 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Santa Cruz County *** 89.7 (68.9, 114.9) 27 (3, 35) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Sutter County *** 89.4 (71.7, 110.5) 28 (5, 35) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Tulare County *** 88.9 (70.9, 110.0) 29 (4, 35) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Kings County *** 87.5 (60.0, 123.3) 30 (2, 35) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Placer County *** 87.4 (73.6, 103.2) 31 (10, 35) 29 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Ventura County *** 86.9 (78.1, 96.5) 32 (17, 35) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Marin County *** 85.4 (68.6, 105.2) 33 (7, 35) 19 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Yolo County *** 80.1 (63.2, 99.9) 34 (13, 35) 16
*
*
Imperial County *** 77.5 (47.4, 120.5) 35 (2, 35) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madera County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2020 2:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top