Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
California N/A No 145.4 (144.8, 146.2) N/A 35,208 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Tehama County Rural No 183.1 (169.4, 197.9) 4 (1, 19) 145 stable stable trend 6.5 (-1.2, 11.6)
Sonoma County Urban No 145.1 (140.6, 149.8) 30 (24, 38) 857 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 3.8)
Kings County Urban No 169.0 (154.7, 184.4) 15 (1, 30) 105 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Merced County Urban No 179.7 (168.8, 191.3) 5 (1, 19) 213 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Tulare County Urban No 171.8 (163.9, 180.1) 12 (2, 21) 369 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Siskiyou County Rural No 170.6 (155.7, 186.9) 14 (1, 29) 114 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Stanislaus County Urban No 173.9 (167.6, 180.4) 9 (2, 18) 609 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.8)
Sutter County Urban No 179.7 (165.9, 194.6) 6 (1, 21) 133 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Yuba County Urban No 189.7 (173.6, 207.0) 1 (1, 17) 109 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Butte County Urban No 178.7 (170.9, 186.8) 7 (1, 16) 427 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Madera County Urban No 153.1 (141.8, 165.2) 24 (12, 41) 150 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Fresno County Urban No 153.1 (148.1, 158.3) 23 (18, 32) 750 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Lake County Rural No 183.5 (170.3, 197.7) 3 (1, 19) 169 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
San Bernardino County Urban No 172.9 (169.0, 176.9) 10 (5, 17) 1,564 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -1.0)
Shasta County Urban No 166.6 (159.2, 174.4) 16 (5, 24) 409 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Solano County Urban No 172.5 (165.4, 179.9) 11 (3, 20) 479 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Glenn County Rural No 177.0 (154.4, 202.8) 8 (1, 35) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Riverside County Urban No 154.6 (151.8, 157.5) 21 (19, 29) 2,447 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -1.1)
Calaveras County Rural No 148.6 (135.6, 162.8) 28 (13, 48) 115 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Del Norte County Rural No 187.2 (165.6, 211.6) 2 (1, 24) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Humboldt County Rural No 171.3 (162.0, 181.1) 13 (3, 22) 274 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Lassen County Rural No 157.5 (137.6, 179.9) 20 (2, 48) 47 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Modoc County Rural No 138.8 (110.4, 175.1) 36 (2, 56) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Sacramento County Urban No 158.5 (155.0, 162.0) 19 (16, 26) 1,680 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -1.2)
San Joaquin County Urban No 164.2 (158.4, 170.2) 18 (9, 23) 643 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -1.1)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 134.1 (128.4, 139.9) 44 (32, 51) 497 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Ventura County Urban No 139.8 (135.6, 144.0) 35 (29, 44) 949 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Yolo County Urban No 152.0 (142.8, 161.6) 26 (16, 38) 214 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Amador County Rural No 143.6 (130.7, 157.9) 34 (17, 52) 100 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Kern County Urban No 166.5 (161.0, 172.2) 17 (8, 22) 728 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.3, -1.1)
San Diego County Urban No 144.6 (142.3, 146.9) 31 (25, 37) 3,336 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.4, -1.3)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 137.0 (131.3, 143.0) 38 (29, 49) 484 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Los Angeles County Urban No 144.6 (142.9, 146.2) 32 (26, 37) 6,169 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.5, -1.4)
Mariposa County Rural No 136.0 (115.6, 160.1) 40 (13, 55) 40 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Mendocino County Rural No 151.4 (140.9, 162.7) 27 (14, 42) 182 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Orange County Urban No 137.2 (135.0, 139.5) 37 (32, 44) 2,985 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.5, -1.4)
Colusa County Rural No 152.9 (124.9, 187.2) 25 (1, 54) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Monterey County Urban No 131.7 (125.0, 138.7) 46 (33, 53) 342 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Placer County Urban No 135.3 (130.6, 140.1) 41 (32, 50) 677 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Santa Cruz County Urban No 134.8 (128.2, 141.6) 43 (31, 52) 351 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
El Dorado County Urban No 128.4 (122.1, 135.1) 49 (36, 54) 338 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Inyo County Rural No 122.9 (103.2, 146.9) 52 (22, 56) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Nevada County Rural No 128.5 (120.5, 137.0) 48 (34, 54) 229 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
San Benito County Urban No 148.0 (129.5, 168.9) 29 (6, 53) 49 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Tuolumne County Rural No 153.3 (141.3, 166.2) 22 (11, 41) 140 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.7, -1.2)
Imperial County Urban No 143.9 (125.6, 164.8) 33 (9, 54) 50 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Plumas County Rural No 135.1 (117.3, 155.8) 42 (18, 55) 49 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Sierra County Rural Yes 116.5 (80.4, 173.8) 54 (5, 57) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Alameda County Urban No 130.0 (126.4, 133.7) 47 (39, 52) 1,046 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -1.9)
Contra Costa County Urban No 133.5 (130.0, 137.2) 45 (35, 50) 1,153 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.8)
San Francisco County Urban No 128.2 (123.4, 133.1) 50 (40, 54) 550 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -2.0)
Marin County Urban Yes 110.6 (105.7, 115.6) 55 (52, 56) 427 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Santa Clara County Urban No 125.1 (121.9, 128.4) 51 (45, 54) 1,241 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.2)
Napa County Urban No 136.5 (128.0, 145.7) 39 (26, 52) 214 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.1, -1.8)
San Mateo County Urban Yes 121.7 (117.4, 126.2) 53 (47, 54) 632 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.4, -2.2)
Trinity County Rural Yes 92.6 (76.6, 112.4) 56 (53, 57) 27 falling falling trend -7.6 (-19.9, -4.1)
Mono County Rural Yes 54.7 (38.7, 77.2) 57 (56, 57) 9 falling falling trend -14.1 (-44.6, -3.3)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 12:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top