Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 173.3 (171.0, 175.7) N/A 4,446 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.7)
United States 6 N/A No 168.6 (168.1, 169.2) N/A 70,631 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.1, -2.0)
Los Angeles County Urban No 176.5 (172.8, 180.3) 14 (9, 22) 1,766 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.6)
Alameda County Urban No 174.1 (166.2, 182.3) 16 (8, 24) 385 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.9)
San Bernardino County Urban No 184.4 (175.2, 194.0) 11 (4, 21) 324 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.3, 5.5)
Sacramento County Urban No 178.3 (168.8, 188.2) 13 (6, 24) 283 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Riverside County Urban No 162.4 (153.7, 171.6) 22 (14, 29) 277 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
San Diego County Urban No 167.4 (157.9, 177.4) 20 (11, 27) 248 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Contra Costa County Urban No 174.0 (163.3, 185.3) 17 (7, 26) 207 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Solano County Urban No 174.8 (161.2, 189.3) 15 (5, 27) 131 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
San Francisco County Urban No 188.9 (173.8, 205.2) 7 (2, 22) 119 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
San Joaquin County Urban No 186.7 (170.5, 203.9) 9 (2, 23) 108 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.0)
Fresno County Urban No 197.2 (178.2, 217.5) 4 (1, 20) 85 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.8)
Orange County Urban No 142.6 (128.0, 158.3) 30 (21, 35) 78 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.8)
Kern County Urban No 193.2 (173.3, 214.7) 6 (1, 23) 76 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Santa Clara County Urban No 141.0 (126.0, 157.3) 31 (21, 35) 69 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
San Mateo County Urban No 172.7 (151.2, 196.6) 18 (3, 30) 48 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Stanislaus County Urban No 199.0 (167.6, 234.3) 3 (1, 26) 32 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.0, 0.3)
Ventura County Urban No 150.0 (124.9, 178.6) 26 (8, 36) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -0.9)
Merced County Urban No 225.6 (184.0, 273.7) 1 (1, 21) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.1)
Monterey County Urban Yes 118.9 (92.6, 150.3) 36 (22, 37) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -2.0)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 140.7 (108.1, 180.1) 32 (7, 37) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Placer County Urban No 150.4 (113.1, 195.4) 25 (3, 37) 12
*
*
Marin County Urban No 171.3 (128.5, 223.2) 19 (1, 35) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Sonoma County Urban No 128.0 (94.8, 168.4) 35 (11, 37) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.1)
Kings County Urban No 193.5 (139.4, 259.4) 5 (1, 35) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Tulare County Urban No 164.4 (120.9, 218.0) 21 (1, 37) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Yolo County Urban No 187.7 (135.8, 251.6) 8 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.7)
Madera County Urban No 162.4 (113.9, 224.2) 23 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Butte County Urban No 209.6 (143.5, 293.3) 2 (1, 35) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.2)
Imperial County Urban No 185.8 (120.6, 272.8) 10 (1, 37) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.6)
Napa County Urban No 159.4 (102.9, 236.1) 24 (1, 37) 5
*
*
Santa Cruz County Urban No 133.1 (82.7, 202.9) 33 (2, 37) 5
*
*
San Luis Obispo County Urban Yes 105.7 (64.6, 162.3) 37 (12, 37) 5 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.8, -1.9)
Yuba County Urban No 143.0 (86.0, 221.2) 29 (1, 37) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.5)
Lake County Rural No 180.4 (107.0, 287.8) 12 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Sutter County Urban No 143.7 (85.5, 226.0) 28 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Shasta County Urban No 145.8 (80.3, 239.5) 27 (1, 37) 3 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.1)
El Dorado County Urban No 132.3 (70.8, 223.2) 34 (1, 37) 3
*
*
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 12:20 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top