Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

Asian/Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A Yes 100.2 (99.1, 101.2) N/A 7,674 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States 6 N/A Yes 93.0 (92.4, 93.6) N/A 20,018 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Alameda County Urban Yes 92.9 (89.5, 96.5) 29 (20, 33) 575 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Butte County Urban No 123.7 (92.8, 161.2) 2 (1, 35) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 1.7)
Contra Costa County Urban Yes 93.7 (88.4, 99.2) 27 (17, 34) 245 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
El Dorado County Urban Yes 91.5 (67.8, 120.9) 30 (2, 37) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 1.8)
Fresno County Urban Yes 103.7 (94.7, 113.4) 16 (4, 30) 101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Humboldt County Rural No 135.6 (86.4, 201.3) 1 (1, 37) 5
*
*
Kern County Urban Yes 89.4 (77.9, 102.2) 31 (11, 37) 46 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.1, 0.0)
Kings County Urban Yes 103.3 (72.9, 142.7) 17 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 1.0)
Los Angeles County Urban Yes 106.1 (104.1, 108.1) 13 (6, 19) 2,304 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
Madera County Urban Yes 85.4 (52.4, 132.9) 35 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Marin County Urban Yes 93.7 (77.4, 112.7) 26 (3, 37) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.3)
Merced County Urban Yes 107.9 (88.1, 130.7) 9 (1, 36) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.6)
Monterey County Urban Yes 110.2 (96.5, 125.7) 6 (1, 30) 50 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.5)
Napa County Urban Yes 99.5 (79.0, 124.3) 22 (1, 37) 17
*
*
Orange County Urban Yes 99.9 (96.9, 102.9) 21 (12, 26) 880 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -0.9)
Placer County Urban Yes 89.1 (76.5, 103.1) 32 (9, 37) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.5, 0.5)
Riverside County Urban Yes 101.9 (95.7, 108.3) 20 (7, 28) 212 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.3)
Sacramento County Urban Yes 107.7 (102.6, 113.0) 10 (4, 21) 341 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.5)
San Benito County Urban Yes 106.9 (62.5, 173.1) 12 (1, 37) 4
*
*
San Bernardino County Urban Yes 104.7 (98.4, 111.3) 15 (4, 26) 214 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.3)
San Diego County Urban Yes 102.8 (98.8, 106.9) 18 (8, 25) 510 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
San Francisco County Urban Yes 98.9 (94.8, 103.1) 23 (13, 28) 492 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.2, -1.7)
San Joaquin County Urban Yes 113.2 (105.3, 121.5) 4 (1, 19) 158 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
San Luis Obispo County Urban Yes 94.7 (70.7, 124.5) 25 (1, 37) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 2.1)
San Mateo County Urban Yes 93.7 (88.8, 98.8) 28 (17, 34) 280 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Santa Barbara County Urban Yes 102.6 (85.5, 122.1) 19 (2, 36) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2)
Santa Clara County Urban Yes 88.2 (85.2, 91.2) 34 (25, 36) 702 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Santa Cruz County Urban Yes 76.5 (57.8, 99.7) 37 (11, 37) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.8)
Shasta County Urban Yes 107.1 (71.5, 153.4) 11 (1, 37) 6
*
*
Solano County Urban Yes 108.9 (100.1, 118.2) 7 (2, 24) 121 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.0)
Sonoma County Urban Yes 105.0 (89.0, 123.2) 14 (2, 35) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.3)
Stanislaus County Urban Yes 117.5 (102.2, 134.4) 3 (1, 24) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 1.1)
Sutter County Urban Yes 82.8 (66.3, 102.4) 36 (8, 37) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.5)
Tulare County Urban Yes 108.5 (88.4, 132.1) 8 (1, 36) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2)
Ventura County Urban Yes 89.0 (80.5, 98.3) 33 (17, 37) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.7)
Yolo County Urban Yes 95.5 (77.9, 115.7) 24 (2, 37) 21
*
*
Yuba County Urban Yes 111.9 (73.4, 162.4) 5 (1, 37) 6
*
*
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Imperial County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 7:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top