Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

Asian/Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California Yes 100.8 (99.8, 101.9) N/A 7,305 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
United States Yes 94.5 (93.9, 95.1) N/A 18,736 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Alameda County Yes 95.0 (91.4, 98.7) 25 (16, 30) 545 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Butte County Yes 122.5 (91.6, 160.1) 2 (1, 34) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Contra Costa County Yes 97.3 (91.7, 103.1) 23 (11, 30) 234 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
El Dorado County Yes 109.5 (82.0, 143.2) 7 (1, 36) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Fresno County Yes 102.9 (93.7, 112.7) 15 (3, 29) 96 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Humboldt County Yes 104.5 (58.0, 170.6) 11 (1, 36) 3
*
*
Kern County Yes 93.6 (81.3, 107.2) 27 (5, 35) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Kings County Yes 106.7 (76.0, 146.4) 10 (1, 36) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Los Angeles County Yes 107.5 (105.5, 109.6) 9 (4, 16) 2,254 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Madera County Yes 75.6 (44.2, 122.7) 36 (2, 36) 4
*
*
Marin County Yes 88.8 (72.4, 108.1) 30 (5, 36) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Merced County Yes 117.0 (95.7, 141.5) 3 (1, 31) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Monterey County Yes 103.6 (90.2, 118.7) 14 (2, 32) 46 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Napa County Yes 104.0 (82.2, 130.4) 12 (1, 35) 16
*
*
Orange County Yes 98.8 (95.8, 101.9) 20 (12, 26) 810 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Placer County Yes 83.3 (70.4, 97.8) 33 (13, 36) 30 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Riverside County Yes 98.6 (92.4, 105.2) 21 (8, 29) 191 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Sacramento County Yes 109.6 (104.2, 115.2) 5 (2, 18) 320 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
San Bernardino County Yes 108.0 (101.2, 115.0) 8 (3, 22) 202 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
San Diego County Yes 103.8 (99.6, 108.0) 13 (6, 23) 487 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
San Francisco County Yes 102.7 (98.6, 107.0) 17 (7, 24) 499 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.9, -2.4)
San Joaquin County Yes 112.1 (103.9, 120.8) 4 (2, 19) 143 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
San Luis Obispo County Yes 94.8 (70.8, 124.8) 26 (2, 36) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.6)
San Mateo County Yes 90.6 (85.6, 95.8) 28 (19, 34) 255 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Santa Barbara County Yes 100.7 (83.5, 120.4) 19 (2, 35) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Santa Clara County Yes 89.0 (86.0, 92.2) 29 (23, 34) 664 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Santa Cruz County Yes 77.7 (58.4, 101.8) 35 (7, 36) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Shasta County Yes 87.1 (55.3, 130.0) 31 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Solano County Yes 102.7 (94.1, 112.1) 16 (4, 29) 109 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Sonoma County Yes 102.1 (86.0, 120.5) 18 (2, 34) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Stanislaus County Yes 109.5 (94.3, 126.5) 6 (2, 31) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Sutter County Yes 95.1 (76.8, 116.7) 24 (2, 36) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Tulare County Yes 98.0 (78.4, 121.0) 22 (2, 36) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Ventura County Yes 84.5 (76.0, 93.8) 32 (21, 36) 74 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Yolo County Yes 80.7 (64.1, 100.1) 34 (11, 36) 17
*
*
Yuba County No 161.4 (112.0, 224.1) 1 (1, 30) 7
*
*
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Imperial County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/24/2023 6:17 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top