Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A Yes 12.0 (11.9, 12.1) N/A 5,404 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.3)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
San Mateo County Urban Yes 8.4 (7.6, 9.2) 53 (45, 53) 83 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.7, -3.0)
Marin County Urban Yes 8.8 (7.6, 10.2) 52 (38, 53) 39 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.2, -2.4)
Monterey County Urban Yes 9.3 (8.1, 10.6) 51 (33, 53) 43 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.6)
San Benito County Urban Yes 9.6 (6.5, 13.6) 50 (4, 53) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.7)
Santa Clara County Urban Yes 9.6 (9.0, 10.2) 49 (39, 52) 210 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.3)
Santa Barbara County Urban Yes 9.9 (8.7, 11.2) 48 (28, 53) 54 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
San Francisco County Urban Yes 10.1 (9.2, 11.0) 47 (31, 51) 111 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.3, -2.5)
Plumas County Rural Yes 10.4 (5.8, 18.0) 46 (1, 53) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.1)
Mariposa County Rural Yes 10.4 (6.2, 17.8) 45 (1, 53) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.6)
El Dorado County Urban Yes 10.4 (8.8, 12.3) 44 (16, 53) 31 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Orange County Urban Yes 10.5 (10.1, 11.0) 43 (31, 48) 401 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.7)
Alameda County Urban Yes 10.6 (9.9, 11.3) 42 (29, 48) 200 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.1, -2.5)
Glenn County Rural Yes 10.8 (6.3, 17.3) 41 (1, 53) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.1)
Nevada County Rural Yes 10.8 (8.6, 13.6) 40 (6, 53) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.6)
Sutter County Urban Yes 11.0 (8.4, 14.1) 39 (3, 53) 13 stable stable trend 6.0 (-3.2, 23.8)
Contra Costa County Urban Yes 11.0 (10.3, 11.8) 38 (24, 47) 159 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -2.0)
Amador County Rural Yes 11.1 (7.9, 15.6) 37 (1, 53) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Yolo County Urban Yes 11.2 (9.2, 13.4) 36 (7, 52) 23 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
San Luis Obispo County Urban Yes 11.2 (9.7, 12.8) 35 (13, 50) 46 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Napa County Urban Yes 11.5 (9.4, 14.0) 34 (4, 52) 23 falling falling trend -3.1 (-11.0, -2.1)
Santa Cruz County Urban Yes 11.5 (9.9, 13.3) 33 (9, 50) 38 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -2.0)
San Diego County Urban Yes 11.5 (11.0, 12.0) 32 (22, 41) 427 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -0.7)
Ventura County Urban Yes 11.7 (10.8, 12.7) 31 (15, 44) 122 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Placer County Urban Yes 11.7 (10.5, 13.0) 30 (12, 47) 68 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
Calaveras County Rural Yes 11.8 (8.3, 16.5) 29 (1, 53) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Imperial County Urban Yes 11.8 (9.7, 14.2) 28 (3, 51) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Madera County Urban Yes 11.8 (9.5, 14.5) 27 (3, 52) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Lassen County Rural Yes 12.3 (7.6, 18.8) 26 (1, 53) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.4)
Shasta County Urban Yes 12.4 (10.5, 14.6) 25 (3, 48) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Sonoma County Urban Yes 12.4 (11.3, 13.7) 24 (7, 39) 86 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -1.9)
Los Angeles County Urban Yes 12.6 (12.3, 12.9) 23 (14, 30) 1,413 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Kings County Urban Yes 12.9 (10.2, 15.9) 22 (1, 50) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Del Norte County Rural Yes 13.1 (8.4, 19.7) 21 (1, 53) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
San Joaquin County Urban Yes 13.1 (12.0, 14.3) 20 (5, 34) 103 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Tuolumne County Rural Yes 13.1 (9.7, 17.5) 19 (1, 52) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Humboldt County Rural Yes 13.2 (10.8, 15.9) 18 (1, 48) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Fresno County Urban Yes 13.2 (12.2, 14.3) 17 (4, 31) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Sacramento County Urban Yes 13.3 (12.5, 14.1) 16 (5, 28) 234 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Butte County Urban Yes 13.4 (11.5, 15.6) 15 (1, 42) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.4, 2.5)
Inyo County Rural Yes 13.4 (7.5, 22.7) 14 (1, 53) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -1.2)
Yuba County Urban Yes 13.5 (9.9, 17.8) 13 (1, 52) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Kern County Urban Yes 13.5 (12.3, 14.7) 12 (3, 31) 110 stable stable trend 6.1 (-0.1, 9.6)
Riverside County Urban Yes 13.6 (12.9, 14.2) 11 (6, 24) 372 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Merced County Urban Yes 13.7 (11.7, 15.9) 10 (1, 39) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Solano County Urban Yes 13.8 (12.4, 15.3) 9 (2, 32) 73 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Colusa County Rural Yes 13.9 (8.0, 22.5) 8 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Mendocino County Rural Yes 14.1 (11.3, 17.5) 7 (1, 46) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Lake County Rural Yes 14.4 (11.2, 18.3) 6 (1, 47) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Siskiyou County Rural Yes 14.5 (10.7, 19.5) 5 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
San Bernardino County Urban Yes 14.6 (13.9, 15.4) 4 (1, 16) 298 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Stanislaus County Urban Yes 14.8 (13.4, 16.3) 3 (1, 24) 83 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Tehama County Rural Yes 15.0 (11.5, 19.3) 2 (1, 46) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Tulare County Urban Yes 15.5 (13.9, 17.3) 1 (1, 20) 66 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 10.8)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2024 8:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top