Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Pancreas, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California *** 10.3 (10.2, 10.5) N/A 4,490 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.0)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 43,836 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Lassen County *** 14.0 (8.9, 21.2) 1 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Yuba County *** 11.9 (8.6, 16.0) 2 (1, 50) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Merced County *** 11.8 (10.0, 14.0) 3 (1, 43) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Tuolumne County *** 11.7 (8.8, 15.5) 4 (1, 49) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.8)
Del Norte County *** 11.6 (7.2, 17.9) 5 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Stanislaus County *** 11.5 (10.3, 12.9) 6 (1, 36) 65 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Solano County *** 11.5 (10.2, 12.9) 7 (1, 38) 62 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Sacramento County *** 11.2 (10.5, 12.0) 8 (2, 29) 185 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.0)
Shasta County *** 11.2 (9.5, 13.2) 9 (1, 46) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Tehama County *** 11.2 (8.4, 14.7) 10 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
San Benito County *** 11.0 (7.5, 15.4) 11 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Kern County *** 10.9 (9.9, 12.1) 12 (2, 40) 85 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Nevada County *** 10.9 (8.8, 13.6) 13 (1, 49) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Ventura County *** 10.9 (10.0, 11.8) 14 (3, 40) 110 stable stable trend -6.9 (-19.0, 7.0)
Contra Costa County *** 10.7 (10.0, 11.5) 15 (4, 39) 150 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.6)
Placer County *** 10.7 (9.5, 12.0) 16 (3, 44) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Napa County *** 10.6 (8.7, 12.9) 17 (1, 48) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
San Diego County *** 10.6 (10.1, 11.1) 18 (7, 35) 381 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.4)
Fresno County *** 10.5 (9.6, 11.5) 19 (4, 43) 100 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Inyo County *** 10.5 (6.1, 17.9) 20 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Butte County *** 10.5 (8.9, 12.4) 21 (1, 48) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Santa Barbara County *** 10.5 (9.3, 11.8) 22 (3, 45) 55 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Kings County *** 10.5 (8.0, 13.4) 23 (1, 50) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Los Angeles County *** 10.4 (10.1, 10.7) 24 (12, 35) 1,126 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
San Luis Obispo County *** 10.4 (9.0, 12.0) 25 (2, 47) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
San Bernardino County *** 10.4 (9.7, 11.0) 26 (8, 41) 204 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Riverside County *** 10.3 (9.7, 10.8) 27 (10, 41) 275 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
San Joaquin County *** 10.2 (9.2, 11.3) 28 (5, 46) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Monterey County *** 10.1 (8.8, 11.6) 29 (4, 48) 45 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Santa Cruz County *** 10.1 (8.5, 11.8) 30 (3, 48) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Marin County *** 10.0 (8.7, 11.5) 31 (4, 48) 42 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.1)
Sonoma County *** 10.0 (9.0, 11.1) 32 (6, 47) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Alameda County *** 10.0 (9.3, 10.7) 33 (11, 44) 178 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Lake County *** 9.9 (7.4, 13.3) 34 (1, 51) 11 stable stable trend -25.5 (-50.1, 11.0)
Humboldt County *** 9.9 (7.9, 12.3) 35 (2, 50) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Tulare County *** 9.9 (8.5, 11.4) 36 (5, 49) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Sutter County *** 9.8 (7.4, 12.7) 37 (1, 51) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Orange County *** 9.8 (9.3, 10.3) 38 (21, 44) 355 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
San Mateo County *** 9.8 (8.9, 10.7) 39 (11, 47) 93 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Madera County *** 9.8 (7.7, 12.2) 40 (2, 50) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Yolo County *** 9.7 (7.9, 11.8) 41 (3, 50) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
San Francisco County *** 9.6 (8.8, 10.5) 42 (13, 48) 103 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.6)
Santa Clara County *** 9.5 (8.9, 10.1) 43 (21, 47) 195 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.4)
Plumas County *** 9.5 (5.4, 16.7) 44 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Mariposa County *** 9.1 (5.1, 16.2) 45 (1, 51) 3
*
*
El Dorado County *** 8.7 (7.2, 10.5) 46 (11, 51) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Calaveras County *** 8.3 (5.7, 12.0) 47 (3, 51) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Imperial County *** 8.2 (6.5, 10.4) 48 (10, 51) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Mendocino County *** 8.0 (6.0, 10.7) 49 (8, 51) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Amador County *** 7.0 (4.6, 10.9) 50 (9, 51) 5
*
*
Siskiyou County *** 6.4 (4.1, 9.9) 51 (16, 51) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2021 12:26 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top