Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 18.8 (18.6, 19.1) N/A 4,551 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Amador County Rural No 15.9 (10.2, 24.8) 40 (2, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.7)
Calaveras County Rural No 19.0 (12.7, 27.9) 23 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Del Norte County Rural No 17.3 (9.7, 29.3) 35 (1, 48) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
Humboldt County Rural No 24.7 (20.1, 30.0) 2 (1, 33) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Lake County Rural No 22.7 (17.1, 29.8) 4 (1, 45) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Lassen County Rural No 37.3 (24.3, 55.1) 1 (1, 28) 6
*
*
Mendocino County Rural No 17.0 (12.9, 22.2) 36 (4, 48) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Nevada County Rural Yes 14.9 (11.2, 19.6) 45 (9, 48) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Siskiyou County Rural No 22.3 (15.5, 31.7) 6 (1, 48) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Tehama County Rural No 20.9 (15.6, 27.8) 9 (1, 48) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Tuolumne County Rural No 19.0 (13.9, 26.0) 24 (2, 48) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Alameda County Urban No 16.5 (15.4, 17.7) 39 (28, 45) 172 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Butte County Urban No 22.0 (18.6, 25.9) 8 (1, 37) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Contra Costa County Urban No 18.5 (17.2, 19.9) 28 (12, 39) 145 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
El Dorado County Urban Yes 15.2 (12.5, 18.5) 43 (18, 48) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
Fresno County Urban No 18.8 (17.2, 20.6) 26 (9, 39) 100 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Imperial County Urban No 16.9 (13.3, 21.1) 37 (5, 48) 16 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Kern County Urban No 20.6 (18.7, 22.6) 10 (3, 33) 88 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Kings County Urban Yes 15.2 (11.1, 20.2) 44 (7, 48) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Los Angeles County Urban No 19.2 (18.7, 19.7) 22 (14, 31) 1,167 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -0.7)
Madera County Urban No 20.5 (16.4, 25.3) 12 (2, 45) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 1.0)
Marin County Urban No 18.1 (15.5, 21.0) 32 (6, 45) 42 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.0)
Merced County Urban No 19.5 (16.3, 23.2) 19 (3, 45) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Monterey County Urban No 16.6 (14.3, 19.1) 38 (14, 48) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Napa County Urban No 19.5 (15.8, 23.8) 21 (2, 46) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Orange County Urban No 18.4 (17.5, 19.2) 30 (17, 37) 373 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 3.0)
Placer County Urban No 18.6 (16.4, 21.0) 27 (7, 42) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Riverside County Urban No 20.0 (19.0, 21.1) 14 (7, 29) 288 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Sacramento County Urban No 20.0 (18.8, 21.4) 13 (7, 32) 194 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 1.9)
San Benito County Urban No 15.6 (10.2, 22.9) 41 (2, 48) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.3)
San Bernardino County Urban No 22.3 (21.1, 23.6) 7 (2, 16) 252 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
San Diego County Urban No 19.5 (18.6, 20.4) 20 (10, 32) 390 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
San Francisco County Urban Yes 14.6 (13.2, 16.2) 47 (34, 48) 84 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.1)
San Joaquin County Urban No 20.0 (18.1, 22.0) 16 (5, 36) 83 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 19.7 (16.9, 22.9) 18 (3, 41) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
San Mateo County Urban Yes 14.7 (13.2, 16.2) 46 (34, 48) 78 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.0, -2.3)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 18.9 (16.6, 21.5) 25 (5, 42) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Santa Clara County Urban Yes 14.5 (13.5, 15.5) 48 (37, 48) 167 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.1)
Santa Cruz County Urban No 18.2 (15.4, 21.4) 31 (5, 47) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Shasta County Urban No 22.7 (19.1, 26.8) 5 (1, 34) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Solano County Urban No 15.5 (13.5, 17.7) 42 (26, 48) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Sonoma County Urban No 18.4 (16.5, 20.5) 29 (9, 42) 73 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Stanislaus County Urban No 23.2 (20.8, 25.8) 3 (1, 20) 71 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Sutter County Urban No 17.6 (13.0, 23.3) 33 (2, 48) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Tulare County Urban No 20.6 (18.0, 23.4) 11 (2, 37) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Ventura County Urban No 20.0 (18.3, 21.8) 15 (5, 35) 112 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.5, 8.5)
Yolo County Urban No 20.0 (16.4, 24.1) 17 (2, 44) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Yuba County Urban No 17.5 (12.2, 24.5) 34 (2, 48) 7 falling falling trend -25.3 (-39.9, -4.3)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2024 11:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top