Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Cervix, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California *** 2.2 (2.1, 2.3) N/A 481 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
United States *** 2.2 (2.2, 2.3) N/A 4,165 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.6)
Shasta County *** 3.4 (1.9, 5.6) 1 (1, 23) 4
*
*
San Bernardino County *** 3.3 (2.8, 3.8) 2 (1, 10) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Tulare County *** 3.2 (2.2, 4.6) 3 (1, 19) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Merced County *** 3.2 (1.9, 4.9) 4 (1, 23) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Stanislaus County *** 3.0 (2.2, 4.1) 5 (1, 18) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Butte County *** 3.0 (1.7, 5.0) 6 (1, 25) 3
*
*
Riverside County *** 2.9 (2.4, 3.3) 7 (1, 14) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Monterey County *** 2.8 (1.9, 4.1) 8 (1, 22) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Kern County *** 2.8 (2.1, 3.6) 9 (1, 18) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.0)
Los Angeles County *** 2.6 (2.4, 2.8) 10 (4, 14) 145 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Sacramento County *** 2.6 (2.1, 3.1) 11 (3, 17) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Fresno County *** 2.5 (1.9, 3.2) 12 (2, 21) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
San Joaquin County *** 2.3 (1.7, 3.1) 13 (3, 23) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Santa Barbara County *** 2.3 (1.4, 3.3) 14 (2, 25) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 1.0)
San Diego County *** 2.1 (1.8, 2.4) 15 (9, 20) 39 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Orange County *** 1.8 (1.6, 2.1) 16 (12, 23) 34 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Santa Cruz County *** 1.8 (1.0, 3.1) 17 (3, 26) 3
*
*
Ventura County *** 1.8 (1.3, 2.5) 18 (9, 25) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Sonoma County *** 1.7 (1.0, 2.5) 19 (7, 26) 5
*
*
Contra Costa County *** 1.6 (1.2, 2.2) 20 (12, 25) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Solano County *** 1.6 (1.0, 2.5) 21 (8, 26) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
San Francisco County *** 1.6 (1.1, 2.2) 22 (12, 26) 8 stable stable trend 19.7 (-23.2, 86.5)
Alameda County *** 1.6 (1.2, 2.0) 23 (13, 26) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Placer County *** 1.3 (0.7, 2.2) 24 (12, 26) 3
*
*
San Mateo County *** 1.2 (0.7, 1.7) 25 (17, 26) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.0)
Santa Clara County *** 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 26 (21, 26) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.4, -2.7)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
El Dorado County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Imperial County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kings County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madera County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Napa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Luis Obispo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutter County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yolo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/21/2021 6:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Napa, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top