Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.1) N/A 1,178 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.7, 2.8)
United States *** 4.9 (4.9, 5.0) N/A 10,558 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.7, 2.2)
San Luis Obispo County *** 3.5 (2.4, 4.9) 33 (11, 33) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
Napa County *** 3.8 (2.2, 6.1) 32 (3, 33) 4
*
*
Tulare County *** 3.8 (2.8, 5.2) 31 (8, 33) 8 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.4, -0.9)
El Dorado County *** 3.9 (2.6, 5.9) 30 (3, 33) 5
*
*
Orange County *** 4.2 (3.8, 4.6) 29 (17, 32) 83 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Fresno County *** 4.2 (3.4, 5.1) 28 (10, 33) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Santa Clara County *** 4.2 (3.7, 4.8) 27 (15, 33) 47 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Kern County *** 4.3 (3.4, 5.3) 26 (9, 33) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.3)
Placer County *** 4.6 (3.5, 5.9) 25 (3, 33) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 3.9)
Yolo County *** 4.6 (3.0, 6.8) 24 (1, 33) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.5)
Riverside County *** 4.6 (4.1, 5.1) 23 (10, 30) 65 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.6)
Madera County *** 4.6 (2.8, 7.1) 22 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Santa Cruz County *** 4.7 (3.3, 6.5) 21 (1, 33) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Marin County *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.3) 20 (2, 33) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Merced County *** 4.7 (3.2, 6.8) 19 (1, 33) 6
*
*
San Joaquin County *** 4.8 (3.9, 5.9) 18 (3, 32) 20 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.5, 3.3)
Monterey County *** 4.9 (3.7, 6.3) 17 (1, 33) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
San Diego County *** 4.9 (4.4, 5.3) 16 (8, 27) 95 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.8)
San Mateo County *** 5.0 (4.1, 6.0) 15 (2, 30) 26 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Santa Barbara County *** 5.0 (3.9, 6.4) 14 (1, 32) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Ventura County *** 5.1 (4.3, 6.1) 13 (2, 29) 27 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.4)
Sacramento County *** 5.2 (4.6, 6.0) 12 (2, 27) 47 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.7)
San Francisco County *** 5.3 (4.5, 6.3) 11 (1, 28) 29 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.7)
Sonoma County *** 5.4 (4.4, 6.6) 10 (1, 29) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Los Angeles County *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 9 (4, 18) 324 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.2, 2.2)
Alameda County *** 5.6 (4.9, 6.3) 8 (1, 22) 54 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.3)
San Bernardino County *** 5.6 (5.0, 6.3) 7 (1, 21) 62 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Contra Costa County *** 5.8 (5.0, 6.6) 6 (1, 21) 44 rising rising trend 8.6 (0.2, 17.8)
Shasta County *** 5.8 (4.2, 7.9) 5 (1, 32) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 3.8)
Stanislaus County *** 6.0 (4.8, 7.4) 4 (1, 26) 18 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 3.9)
Humboldt County *** 6.1 (4.0, 9.1) 3 (1, 32) 6
*
*
Solano County *** 6.3 (5.0, 7.8) 2 (1, 24) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Butte County *** 6.6 (4.9, 8.8) 1 (1, 26) 11 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.7)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Imperial County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kings County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutter County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/06/2021 4:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top