Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Prostate, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California *** 19.9 (19.6, 20.2) N/A 3,469 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
United States *** 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 29,907 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Los Angeles County *** 20.2 (19.6, 20.8) 26 (16, 32) 860 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.7)
San Diego County *** 21.7 (20.6, 22.8) 14 (9, 26) 318 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.1)
Orange County *** 17.9 (17.0, 18.9) 37 (26, 43) 261 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.8)
Riverside County *** 20.6 (19.4, 21.8) 22 (12, 33) 230 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.3, 7.3)
San Bernardino County *** 26.0 (24.4, 27.8) 6 (1, 13) 191 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Sacramento County *** 19.5 (18.0, 21.1) 30 (15, 40) 127 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Santa Clara County *** 14.9 (13.7, 16.1) 48 (39, 48) 125 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.6, -2.8)
Alameda County *** 17.7 (16.3, 19.2) 38 (24, 45) 124 falling falling trend -3.5 (-3.9, -3.0)
Contra Costa County *** 19.6 (18.0, 21.4) 28 (13, 40) 107 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.3, -2.5)
Ventura County *** 18.2 (16.3, 20.1) 34 (18, 45) 74 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
San Joaquin County *** 26.0 (23.3, 28.8) 7 (1, 18) 73 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 7.8)
San Francisco County *** 15.6 (14.0, 17.3) 45 (33, 48) 72 stable stable trend 9.2 (-4.2, 24.5)
San Mateo County *** 16.8 (15.0, 18.7) 42 (25, 48) 66 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.5)
Kern County *** 21.9 (19.5, 24.4) 13 (6, 34) 66 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Fresno County *** 17.1 (15.3, 19.1) 39 (23, 47) 65 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.8, -2.7)
Sonoma County *** 19.6 (17.3, 22.1) 29 (11, 44) 55 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.2)
Solano County *** 26.8 (23.6, 30.3) 4 (1, 17) 52 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.9)
Stanislaus County *** 23.3 (20.5, 26.4) 10 (3, 30) 51 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Placer County *** 20.9 (18.3, 23.8) 20 (7, 41) 48 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.1)
Santa Barbara County *** 16.9 (14.6, 19.5) 40 (21, 48) 39 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Monterey County *** 18.0 (15.3, 21.0) 35 (13, 48) 33 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.1)
San Luis Obispo County *** 18.9 (16.1, 22.1) 33 (10, 47) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.6)
Tulare County *** 19.3 (16.4, 22.6) 31 (8, 46) 31 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Marin County *** 16.8 (14.2, 19.8) 41 (17, 48) 30 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.7)
Butte County *** 21.4 (17.9, 25.3) 16 (4, 43) 28 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Santa Cruz County *** 21.4 (17.7, 25.5) 18 (4, 44) 27 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.6)
El Dorado County *** 20.2 (16.7, 24.3) 25 (5, 46) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Shasta County *** 20.4 (16.8, 24.5) 23 (5, 46) 24 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Merced County *** 23.2 (19.1, 28.0) 11 (1, 41) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Napa County *** 22.1 (17.9, 27.0) 12 (2, 44) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.6)
Humboldt County *** 25.6 (20.5, 31.7) 8 (1, 37) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Yolo County *** 21.2 (17.0, 26.2) 19 (3, 46) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Nevada County *** 20.0 (15.8, 25.3) 27 (4, 48) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Imperial County *** 18.0 (14.0, 22.6) 36 (8, 48) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.0)
Madera County *** 20.3 (15.7, 25.8) 24 (3, 48) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Mendocino County *** 26.3 (20.2, 33.7) 5 (1, 41) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Lake County *** 23.8 (17.8, 31.6) 9 (1, 46) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.3)
Kings County *** 19.2 (14.0, 25.5) 32 (3, 48) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Siskiyou County *** 28.0 (20.3, 38.0) 3 (1, 42) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.6)
Tehama County *** 21.4 (15.4, 29.2) 15 (1, 48) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.1)
Sutter County *** 16.6 (11.9, 22.6) 43 (8, 48) 8 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.3)
Yuba County *** 29.6 (21.1, 40.2) 1 (1, 41) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Calaveras County *** 20.7 (14.5, 29.3) 21 (1, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.1)
Tuolumne County *** 16.4 (11.5, 23.2) 44 (8, 48) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -1.9)
Amador County *** 15.0 (9.7, 23.2) 47 (7, 48) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.0)
Glenn County *** 29.1 (17.9, 44.7) 2 (1, 48) 4
*
*
San Benito County *** 15.3 (8.9, 24.1) 46 (4, 48) 4
*
*
Del Norte County *** 21.4 (12.0, 35.1) 17 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/24/2020 7:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top