Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Prostate, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California No 19.8 (19.5, 20.1) N/A 3,649 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
United States No 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 31,337 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Yuba County No 25.8 (18.2, 35.3) 3 (1, 46) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Yolo County No 20.9 (16.7, 25.7) 21 (2, 46) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Ventura County No 18.4 (16.7, 20.4) 33 (17, 44) 80 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Tuolumne County Yes 14.6 (10.1, 20.9) 47 (11, 48) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.1)
Tulare County No 18.3 (15.5, 21.4) 35 (11, 47) 31 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.0)
Tehama County No 20.6 (14.9, 28.0) 24 (1, 48) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.1)
Sutter County No 22.4 (17.0, 29.0) 14 (1, 46) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Stanislaus County No 23.1 (20.3, 26.1) 9 (1, 32) 52 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Sonoma County No 19.3 (17.1, 21.7) 29 (11, 43) 57 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -2.0)
Solano County No 26.4 (23.3, 29.8) 1 (1, 17) 55 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Siskiyou County No 24.1 (17.1, 33.4) 6 (1, 47) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Shasta County No 22.6 (18.9, 26.9) 11 (1, 40) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Santa Cruz County No 20.8 (17.4, 24.7) 22 (3, 43) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Santa Clara County Yes 14.3 (13.2, 15.5) 48 (40, 48) 127 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.4, -2.8)
Santa Barbara County No 18.2 (15.8, 20.8) 37 (14, 46) 43 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
San Mateo County Yes 16.7 (15.0, 18.6) 41 (26, 47) 69 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.5, -2.5)
San Luis Obispo County No 19.9 (17.1, 23.0) 27 (7, 44) 37 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
San Joaquin County No 23.6 (21.1, 26.2) 8 (1, 25) 71 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 2.9)
San Francisco County Yes 15.9 (14.3, 17.6) 43 (31, 48) 76 stable stable trend 3.1 (-2.0, 8.5)
San Diego County No 21.5 (20.5, 22.6) 18 (8, 26) 331 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
San Bernardino County No 25.0 (23.4, 26.6) 4 (1, 14) 194 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
San Benito County Yes 14.7 (8.7, 23.0) 46 (3, 48) 4
*
*
Sacramento County No 21.7 (20.2, 23.4) 17 (6, 29) 150 rising rising trend 7.8 (1.7, 14.3)
Riverside County No 21.0 (19.8, 22.2) 20 (9, 30) 252 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Placer County No 18.4 (16.1, 21.0) 34 (12, 45) 46 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.2)
Orange County No 17.9 (17.0, 18.9) 38 (25, 43) 277 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Nevada County No 19.5 (15.5, 24.5) 28 (3, 47) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Napa County No 21.2 (17.2, 26.0) 19 (1, 44) 19 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.6)
Monterey County No 17.1 (14.6, 20.0) 39 (17, 48) 34 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.2)
Merced County No 20.8 (17.0, 25.2) 23 (2, 45) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Mendocino County No 24.8 (19.2, 31.7) 5 (1, 41) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Marin County Yes 15.9 (13.5, 18.8) 42 (23, 48) 30 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.8)
Madera County No 18.7 (14.4, 23.9) 31 (4, 48) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Los Angeles County No 20.0 (19.4, 20.6) 25 (17, 32) 892 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Lake County No 22.8 (16.9, 30.3) 10 (1, 47) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Kings County Yes 15.0 (10.6, 20.4) 45 (10, 48) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Kern County No 22.2 (19.9, 24.7) 15 (3, 32) 70 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Imperial County Yes 15.8 (12.1, 20.1) 44 (13, 48) 13 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.3)
Humboldt County No 26.3 (21.3, 32.3) 2 (1, 33) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Glenn County No 22.0 (12.5, 36.0) 16 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Fresno County No 18.9 (17.0, 21.0) 30 (13, 43) 74 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.4, 9.1)
El Dorado County No 18.6 (15.4, 22.3) 32 (8, 47) 25 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Del Norte County No 22.4 (13.0, 36.1) 13 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Contra Costa County No 20.0 (18.4, 21.7) 26 (11, 38) 116 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.2)
Calaveras County No 23.8 (17.4, 32.5) 7 (1, 46) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Butte County No 22.6 (19.0, 26.7) 12 (1, 39) 29 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Amador County Yes 16.8 (11.1, 25.1) 40 (3, 48) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.2)
Alameda County No 18.2 (16.8, 19.7) 36 (21, 43) 136 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.7, -2.9)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/29/2023 7:25 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top